Skip to main content

'Diversion of forest land': Why is govt scheme for wildlife habitats a cruel joke

By Shankar Sharma* 
In light of recent reports regarding the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats, it has been announced that the Ministry of Environment, Forestry, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) has successfully met its 100-day target for enhancing wildlife habitats. While the media celebrates this milestone, and the Ministry may take pride in their achievement, environmental advocates across the country have reason to approach such claims with skepticism. 
The current state of our environment, particularly wildlife habitats, raises serious concerns about the overall health of the nation’s ecosystems. Over the past two to three decades, countless instances have surfaced where forest lands, including those in legally protected areas, have been allocated for non-forestry projects. 
Reports indicate that the National Wildlife Board approved approximately 500 projects in forests and protected areas from 2014 to 2018, resulting in the loss of about 120,000 hectares of primary forest in just five years. This raises questions about the commitment of the National Board for Wildlife and the MoEF&CC to safeguard our environment and wildlife habitats. 
According to a study by the World Resources Institute, the country lost 1.6 million hectares of tree cover and 16 million trees between 2001 and 2018, with a staggering 9.4 million trees cut down in the last four years alone. The country's remaining forests and natural resources, along with public health, are at critical risk. 
Over the past six years since July 2014, India has approved more than 270 projects in and around its most protected areas, including biodiversity hotspots and national parks, while simultaneously relaxing environmental protections. This interference threatens not only habitats and ecosystems but also poses a danger to public well-being. 
Data reveals that the MoEF&CC has granted environmental clearance for 87% (2,256 out of 2,592) of proposals submitted between July 2014 and April 2020. If this trend continues, it is likely that most of the nation’s original forests, which hold immense ecological significance, will be lost within a few decades. Legally protected areas (PAs) account for only about 14% of forested land and a mere 4.61% of the total land area in India. 
Even though there has been an increase in national parks and wildlife sanctuaries since 1970, the protection these areas receive is concerning. Surveys from the mid-1980s indicated that over 65% of PAs were characterized by human settlements and resource extraction, leading to further encroachment into pristine forested areas for non-forestry uses. 
Legally protected areas account for only about 14% of forested land and a mere 4.61% of the total land area in India
Recent policy decisions exemplifying this issue include the consideration of applications to divert vast tracts of untouched land in a Karnataka sanctuary for a pumped storage power plant and a proposal for uranium mining in a tiger reserve in Telangana. 
Despite decades of development efforts resulting in a drastic reduction of PAs to less than 5% of the land area, there remains a political perception that economic development is insufficient, prompting calls for further reductions in PAs. Such actions are unlikely to benefit local communities; rather, they will most likely lead to increased disasters related to biodiversity loss. 
Highlighting the urgency of these issues, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently stated that "the battle to secure the planet's future will be won or lost in the next 18 months." 
With only 21% of the country’s total land area covered by forests and tree cover, significantly short of the national policy target of 33%, the ongoing conversion of natural forest lands for various so-called development projects presents a grim reality for committed environmentalists. The celebration of routine milestones, such as the one associated with the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for Integrated Development of Wildlife Habitats, may seem like a cruel joke in this context. 
Ultimately, the true test of the Ministry’s commitment to wildlife habitat protection will be its response to calls from environmentalists in Karnataka, who are keenly awaiting a clear and lasting rejection of proposals to construct hydropower plants within three different wildlife sanctuaries that threaten to devastate thousands of acres of dense tropical forests. 
Additionally, over 20 linear project proposals in the Western Ghats, either within or adjacent to protected areas, seek to divert thousands of acres of natural forests, further underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive environmental safeguards. 
--- 
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst. This article reflects the author’s representation to the Union Minister for Environment, Forestry, and Climate Change, New Delhi, and the Vice Chairperson of NITI Aayog, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.