Skip to main content

Would China learn from British experience, allow other countries to live in peace?

 
By NS Venkataraman*
Several decades back, China aggressively entered Tibet, over powered the Tibetans who resisted China’s aggression and mercilessly massacred large number of Tibetans. Today, China is sitting pretty with full control over Tibet region and is hiding Tibet with an “iron curtain” from the eyes of the world. Outside China and probably within China, most people do not know what is really happening in Tibet at present.
After the onslaught on Tibet, with no worthwhile protest from other countries about China’s act of aggression, China appears to have convinced itself that it can have its way to satisfy its territorial greed by occupying other regions at its will.
China claims that Taiwan should be part of China, though there is no justification for this. Taiwan emerged as separate region after a civil war in China, and if China claims that Taiwan should belong to it, then Taiwan too can have equal claim that China should belong to it.
On several occasions, China has threatened to invade Taiwan to acquire it. However, unlike in the case of Tibet when China’s aggression over Tibet virtually went unchallenged, Taiwan region has the support of Western countries. This has prevented China from militarily operating against Taiwan, even as China’s territorial greed persists.
South China Sea is an area where China claims its sovereignty and is rejecting the claims of other countries including Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan. China-Philippines tensions are now rising around a flash point in the South China Sea, due to China’s aggressive posture.
There is territorial dispute regarding the Senkaku Islands between Japan China and Taiwan. It is now claimed by China that Senkaku Islands belong to China and there is considerable tension in the region due to China’s claim and aggressive postures. China is not ready to discuss the issue and arrive at amicable solution.

Occupation of Indian territory:

China launched a war against India in the year 1962 and is now holding thousands of hectares of Indian territory as its own, which was occupied by China during the war. Frequently, China is creating issues in the border with India and skirmishes between Chinese and Indian soldiers are becoming frequent.
China now claims that Arunachal Pradesh in India should belong to China and is doing everything to stress it’s claim, short of going for full fledged war with India.
Recently, China has released a fourth list of thirty new names of various places in Arunachal Pradesh, amid China’s stepped up assertions in recent weeks to re emphasise its claim over the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh.
The Chinese Civil Affairs Ministry released the first list of the standardised names of six places in “Zangnan” ( Name given by China for Arunachal PPrades) in 2017. The second list of 15 places was issued in 2021, followed by another list with names for 11 places in 2023.
Naming of places in India’s Arunachal Pradesh by China indicate the height of arrogance of the Chinese government and its confidence that it can do anything against other countries and get away with it.
Obviously, the unquenched territorial greed of China makes it behave with such aggressive postures against other countries.

Stranglehold over Pakistan:

By tempting and persuading Pakistan to implement the economic corridor project, China has extended huge loan to Pakistan to implement such projects, even as China knows that Pakistan would never be able to repay the loan and accrued interest in the foreseeable future. Thus, Pakistan has now become highly dependent on China and is indebted to it.
In the process, China has taken control of Gwadar port in Pakistan and is creating access to transport material from Gwadar port to China.
Obviously, China will never let go its vice like grip over Pakistan in future.

Take over Hambantota port in Sri Lanka:

Like what China has done in Pakistan, it has extended huge loan to Sri Lanka and implemented projects in Sri Lanka, which has benefited Chinese industries and economy of China, more than that of Sri Lanka.
With Sri Lanka facing a debt trap, China has taken over Hambantota port on 99 year lease from Sri Lanka in lieu of the loan that Sri Lanka has availed from China.
99 year lease is a very long period and the ground reality is that China will never give up its vice like grip over Hambantota port, which area ultimately may become an extended territory of China for all practical purposes.

What could be the ultimate limit of China’s greed?

It is generally said that the greed has no limits as such. The ultimate limit of greed would happen, when the level of greed would make an individual or a group or a country to over reach in satisfying the unquenched greed. Such scenario would cause huge resistance from the people in the affected regions, creating an insurmountable problem for the entity with the unquenched greed.
British empire, which expanded the territory under its control in different continents for several centuries, has lost all such territories and remain as one of many nations in the world now. Its past glory is now a matter of distant memory. China should derive the right lessons from the experience of British empire and China should allow other countries to live in peace.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.