Skip to main content

Brahmanical legacy? Spineless paratroopers leaving Congress 'shouldn't worry' party

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
The so-called 'exodus' of spineless paratroopers from the Congress party should not worry anyone. At the moment, any such parasite who can abuse the Gandhis and the Congress would be seen by the Manuwadi Brahmin-Bania media as BJP's great achievement.
Most of these paratroopers actually enjoyed unlimited powers in the Congress because of their 'jaati' and their degrees from various universities abroad. They are great at 'arguments' and fight cases like a 'lawyer', which means whichever party funds them, they will twist their arguments accordingly.
Politics is not about being a 'great debater' or being 'argumentative', but also commitment to ideology and convictions. Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar used to call the Indian National Congress a Brahmanical party because it rarely spoke about social change, as most of the leaders were committed to varna dharma, and were not ready to fight for the annihilation of caste.
However, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was a visionary, hence India developed policies which benifitted all segments of society, particularly scheduled castes and tribes (SC and ST) and other marginalised sections. Public sector undertakings grew. India under him was largely a welfare state.
The party faced a huge crisis after Indira Gandhi came to power. She nationalised banks, ended privy purses and took the issue of SCs, STs and minorities seriously. The Congress' right-wing lobby at that time led by Morarji Desai opposed all this. Desai, a staunch opponent of nationalisation of bank, failed to read what the masses wanted.
Indira Gandhi got massive mandate and all the kshatrapas were defeated. The people who left the Congress at that time and challenged Indira Gandhi were leaders of the party, but not rootless, yet they got defeated.
Right now, the people who are leaving the Congress are mostly the backyard boys of the Brahmanical elite. Many of them can't fight elections. When they did, they lost heavily. Yet they want to preside over the party and deliberate.
Rahul Gandhi's Congress gave these people more importance than what they deserved. These people remained uncomfortable with the agenda of social justice. They sang songs of secularism and against the 'economic' policies, but as soon as Rahul Gandhi spoke so eloquently for social justice, caste census and representation, these drawing room manipulators actually felt they have no space.
There is a big reality which Rahul Gandhi needs. The Congress was an ocean where all kinds of forces had space to survive, but now time has come when such adjustment will not work. All such forces could only survive in the Congress because the Brahmanical elite had control over the party.
As long as this Brahmanical elite has control of the party and power, these people were ready to sing the song of social justice, but as soon as they realised that the marginalised were seeking representation in the power structure and the Congress party was ready to accommodate them, they get panicky and looked for green pastures.
I can understand their pain as they feel that the Congress has become 'dishahin' or directionless, but if they were really committed to ideology, they should have stayed out of the BJP. They have enough money to engage with people, do social work, or even join other secular parties. But by singing the 'sanatana' rag, they have proved that they are nothing but pure believers of the Brahmin-Bania hegemony, which is being challenged, hence they moved out.
Rahul Gandhi would need to understand that even in the past the Congress was dominated by forces which had no root. Pranab Mukherjee and Ghulam Nabi Azad and many others who presided over the fate of the leaders of the party never had the courage to face the people. Mukherjee dominated the party for long but could only enter the Lok Sabha with Mamata Banerjee's support.
He would speak on anything but could not make the Congress a force in West Bengal. In the end, he started hobnobbing with RSS and BJP to be in power. Everybody knew his relations with Reliance. It was Mukherjee who mishandled the Anna Hazare movement that benefited BJP enormously.
Similarly, Ghulam Nabi Azad enjoyed everything in the party without giving the party anything. He is now happy to join NDA. The point is, the Congress needs to understand the importance of convictions and ideology as well as mass leaders. To the credit of Rahul Gandhi, the Congress is now looking towards a categorical ideological force to fight against the Sangh Parivar's tainted vision of an exclusive India which excludes the minorities and the marginalised.
Already, Narendra Modi and the Sangh Parivar do not like rights-based politics, which they feel has destroyed India. In their scheme of things, Indians should be tied to 'duties' alone, and that too as dictated by RSS and the huge number of Manuwadi babas that would preach you to follow their view f things.
Rahul Gandhi and the Congress must focus on fighting the Lok Sabha elections seriously. There is a massive undercurrent, and the Congress and the INDIA alliance partners need to focus on the issues of the people. They must speak about a united and inclusive India, where everyone grow and prosper.
All the recent "cross overs" have happened during electioneering, but it should not hurt. The Congress is getting cleansed. It does not need those who have no trust in social justice and inclusive politics. The Congress needs to honour leaders like Digvijay Singh, who has given the Congress more than any of his contemporaries. A man who remains committed to the Congress ideals and social justice, it is the Brahmanical coterie in the Congress which vilifies him.
Let the Congress and the INDIA alliance offer committed and credible pro-people candidates and start campaigning seriously. People of India are looking for a change, and without the Congress as the central figure, this wouldn't be not possible.
The Congress should wake up and fight to provide an alternative to people. Everywhere, people are realising that the Congress had always been a better alternative than any of the other parties which replaced it. Parties do make mistakes and people teach them lessons. Now it is time for the Congress to act and fight the battle seriously as India is looking for a change.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.