How huge crowd at Mukhtar Ansari funeral is comparable to BJP's 'people's court' talk

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

The massive crowd at the funeral of Mukhtar Ansari in Mohammadabad reflects the power and influence that his family wields in the area. One can't deny that he had enormous power in Ghazipur and Mau districts. But the crowd that came and chanted slogans in his favour does not exonerate him of his conviction by the court. It is important that we understand this.

Netas always claim that for them 'janta kee adalat' or 'people's court' is more important. Remember, how Kalyan Singh when accused of dereliction of duty in the Babri Mosque demolition case again and again said that for him 'Lord Ram's court' was bigger and more important than the Supreme Court?

The points related to Mukhtar Ansari are two.

One, he was an undertrial in many cases, and secondly, he was also a convict in some other cases. But the crowd of four lakh people at the venue does not absolve him from his crimes and makes him a saint. It is same as what BJP is trying to do. Lal Krishna Advani has been an accused by CBI in the Babri Mosque demolition case, yet on March 31 he received Bharat Ratna from the President of India, who went to his house in person.

Whether it is Atik Ahmed or Mukhtar Ansari, or for that matter Vikas Dube, the job of the government and police was to ensure their protection as per the law. They would have been sentenced by the courts. The police cannot be allowed to become the judge. Whatever the reason for Mukhtar Ansari's death, the fact is, those are making him a great champion, and others who consider him a villain, are actually part of the same thought process and are hypocrites.

Gathering of large number of people is not and should not be a reflection of one's 'greatness'. Many great people did not find people to stand with them. Public come to you because of various purposes. Many felt Mukhtar Ansari was the only 'resisting' Muslim leader, others felt he was helpful to them.

Hasn't one heard the stories of big mafias helping the 'poor'? Right from Veerappan to Atik Ahmed to those in Chambal, there are stories around their humane aspect. Some became mafias to protect their empire while other because they were victims of circumstances. The network of these groups is often more powerful than any internet network. They minutely observe activities of their opponents as well their supporters. When they have power, they challenge anyone who dares de fy them.

The question here is not about the great family of Mukhtar Ansari, which truly was, but that he was convicted for cases of murder, hence he should be judged not for who his father was but what his activities have been.

Be that as it may, the rule of law must be followed. The death in police or judicial custody is a serious crime and must be impartially investigated. For the state government, it is important that it must act fast on Hindu, including savarna, mafias, who are now part of the Hindutva structure.

Let the law be used impartially against all. The day law is not differentiated on the basis of caste and religious identity, life will become better. But as long as the law of the land is not used impartially, the result would be -- my mafia is your villain, and your mafia is my villain.

----

*Human rights defender

Comments

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.

Search This Blog