Skip to main content

Making aadhaar compulsory for Central entrance test 'violates' Supreme Court order

Counterview Desk

A human rights group, Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), has said that, violating the Supreme Court judgment, the Union education ministry’s National Testing Agency (NTA) went ahead with making mandatory the 12-digit Unique Identification (UID)/ Aadhaar Number for registering under the Central University Entrance Test (CUET).
Citing a cyber security researcher, who has sought “alternative option for registration and application without UID/Aadhaar Number”, CFCL in a statement said, the Union Education Minister “ought to instruct NTA to ensure compliance with the judgement of the Supreme Court on Aadhaar Act, UIDAI’s circular of September 2018, and Union Education Minister's assurance in Parliament on July 26, 2023 in order to ensure that no student/ candidate is denied a viable alternative and equitable access to the registration process for CUET and other NTA's tests.”
“This is required to safeguard the fundamental right to education recognized under Article 21 of our Constitution”, it added.

Text:

In contempt of Supreme Court's judgement against mandatory 12-digit Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar Number for admission in education institutions and in spite of Union Education Minister’s assurance, students are unable to undertake registration to fill application form for Central University Entrance Test (CUET) for admission to different programmes of 200 Central Universities without 12-digit Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar Number.
Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) strongly disapproves of such illegitimate, illegal and questionable conduct of National Testing Agency (NTA), a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, one of the laws under which NGOs are registered in general. It was registered/established by Department of Higher Education, Union Ministry of Education in 2018.
Avinav Kumar, a cyber security researcher has written a letter dated March 25, 2024 to Subodh Kumar Singh, Director General, National Testing Agency (NTA), Department of Higher Education, Union Ministry of Education seeking alternative option for registration and application without UID/Aadhaar Number.
The following facts are relevant to NTA's conduct:
1. The CUET UG 2024 registration procedure on the NTA website is ridden with an engineered problem. While registering for filling the CUCET Form. It has been noticed that six out of the eight registration options require the input of an UID/Aadhaar Number for the registration process to be completed. The two other alternative options relate to registration using passport information, which one does not have.
2. Mandatory requirement of UID/Aadhaar Number is in manifest violation of the 1448 page long judgement of Supreme Court's 5-Judge Constitution Bench on UID/Aadhaar Number under Aadhaar Act, 2016.
3. The directions given at page numbers 401-402, paragraph 332 of the Supreme Court's judgement dated 26 September, 2018 creates a legal compulsion for review and revision of the orders which make UID/Aadhaar Number compulsory.
4. The judgement dated 26 September, 2018 has specifically held that Aadhaar Number UID/Aadhaar Number cannot be made mandatory, children cannot be denied benefits for lack of Aadhaar Number (See Page No. 393, para 325; Page No. 401, para 332). The judgment states “At the same time, we hope that the respondents (Union of India and others) shall not unduly expand the scope of ‘subsidies, services and benefits’ thereby widening the net of Aadhaar, where it is not permitted otherwise.” (Page No. 391). At para 331 of the judgment, the Court has held the following:
"331. After considering the matter in depth and having regard to the discussion aforesaid, we hold as under:
(a) For the enrolment of children under the Aadhaar Act, it would be essential to have the consent of their parents/guardian.
(b) On attaining the age of majority, such children who are enrolled under Aadhaar with the consent of their parents, shall be given the right to exit from Aadhaar, if they so choose.
(c) Insofar as the school admissions of children are concerned, requirement of Aadhaar would not be compulsory as it is neither a service nor subsidy. Further, having regard to the fact that a child between the age of 6 to 14 years has the fundamental right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution, school admission cannot be treated as ‘benefit’ as well.
(d) Benefits to children between 6 to 14 years under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, likewise, shall not require mandatory Aadhaar enrolment.
(e) For availing the benefits of other welfare schemes which are covered by Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act, though enrolment number can be insisted, it would be subject to the consent of the parents, as mentioned in (a) above.
(f) We also clarify that no child shall be denied benefit of any of these schemes if, for some reasons, she is not able to produce the Aadhaar Number and the benefit shall be given by verifying the identity on the basis of any other documents. We may record that a statement to this effect was also made by Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India, at the Bar."
Children cannot be denied benefits for lack of Aadhaar (See Page No. 393, para 325; Page No. 401, para 332).
5. Para 3 of the Circular (F.No. 4(4)/57/146/2012/E&U) of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India dated September 5 2018 was cited by the Union Ministry of Education in the Parliament which states the following:
"It must be ensured that no children are deprived/denied of their due benefits or rights for want of Aadhaar. Some instances have come to our notice that few schools are denying admission to children for want of Aadhaar. Such denials are invalid and not permitted under the law. It is also to be ensured that no child should be deprived/denied of their due benefits or rights for want of Aadhaar. No child should be denied admission and other facilities for lack of Aadhaar." Referring to this circular, Hon'ble Union Minister informed the Parliament that "As per the circular dated 05.09.2018 issued by Unique Identification Authority of India, children may not be deprived/denied of their due benefits or rights for want of Aadhaar. No child should be denied admission and other facilities for lack of Aadhaar. The Department of School Education and Literacy has also issued a notification dated 29.11.2021 stating that no eligible child shall be denied benefit under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Samagra Shiksha in case of failure to establish his identity by undergoing authentication or furnishing proof of possession of Aadhar Number."
It is evident from the above mentioned indisputable judgement of the Hon’ble Court that there is a compelling legal obligation on the part of the NTA to rectify/modify its online registration and application form to enable registration for filling the CUET application form and other forms of NTA without 12-digit Unique Identification (UID)/Aadhaar Number.
This creates an immediate and urgent necessity for providing a substitute registration method – such as email or mobile authentication for students who do not have an UID/ Aadhaar Number or a valid passport to register for CUET UG 2024 and other NTA tests. The prompt implementation of an alternative registration avenue, distinct from the current aforementioned options alone, can facilitate students who do not possess either an UID/ Aadhaar Number or a valid passport before the deadline for CUET 2024 registration process ends on March 26, 2024.
Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) demands that Union Education Minister ought to instruct NTA to ensure compliance with the judgement of Supreme Court on Aadhaar Act, UIDAI’s circular of September 2018 and Union Education Minister's assurance in Parliament on July 26, 2023 in order to ensure that no student/candidate is denied a viable alternative and equitable access to the registration process for CUET and other NTA's tests. This is required to safeguard the fundamental right to education recognized under Article 21 of our Constitution.

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

Frugal funds, fading promises: Budget 2026 exposes shrinking space for minority welfare

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The Ministry of Minority Affairs was established in 2006 during the tenure of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, following the findings of the Sachar Committee, which documented that Muslims were among the most educationally and economically disadvantaged communities in India. The ministry was conceived as a corrective institutional response to deep structural inequalities faced by religious minorities, particularly Muslims, through focused policy interventions.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.