Skip to main content

Legal notice to CM Rupani, DGP: Why are Gujarat farmers being 'illegally' detained?

By A Representative

Taking strong exception to the Gujarat government’s alleged preventive detentions of a large number of farmer leaders this week in order to stop them from holding any protests in support of the Bharat bandh on December 8, a legal notice served on chief minister Vijay Rupani, the home minister, the chief secretary, the director general of police, and other senior police officials has sought know under which law these “illegal” actions were being carried out.
Served through senior Gujarat High Court (HC) advocate Anand Yagnik by Gujarat Khedut Samaj leaders Jayesh Patel, Dahyabhai Gajera, Arun Mehta and Purshottam Parmar; Gujarat Kisan Congress leaders Palbhai Ambaliya, Chetan Gadhiya and Girdharbhai Vaghela, and others, the legal notice said the detentions and house arrests were made “without FIR” and were “unconstitutional”, wondering why they should not approach HC and Supreme Court for stopping such action.
The legal notice said, “Between 9:00 pm of December 7 to 10:00 am of December 8, Jayesh Patel, Ramesh Patel, Dahyabhai Gajera, Arun Mehta, Pal Ambaliya, Girdharbhai Vaghela, Pravin Patodiya and Chetan Gadhiya were “preventively detained, arrested or put in house arrest” up to 6 pm on December 8 by the state police.
It said, starting on December 7, the cops started visiting houses and offices of these leaders and remained in the premises of the house or office “in spite of protest against such entry, encroachment and trespass”, insisting, this is against the right to privacy and basic human and constitutional rights and principles of civil liberties and personal liberty, as “guaranteed” under the Constitution.
This was done, said the legal notice, despite the fact that “not a single farmer leader and their associates violated Section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code warranting arrest or detention”. The farmers leaders were only verbally told that the detention or arrest was “in accordance with the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Gujarat Police Act, 1951.”
“This means that the elected and unelected executives in charge of law and order sitting at Gandhinagar or elsewhere, in a comprehensive, concerted and collective manner do take illegal and unconstitutional decisions and entire police department is told to implement the same”, the legal notice alleged.
Notice calls police action unconstitutional, accuses Gujarat BJP rulers of misusing state machinery to thwart farmers' right to dissent
Giving more details, the legal notice said, on December 10, cops from the local police station visited the office Jayesh Patel in Surat, asking him whether he was going to Gandhinagar on December 11 and then to Delhi on December 12. Again, on December 11,when he was attending a family function at home, cops were “hovering around his house in order to prevent him for leaving his house and Surat City.”
Pointing towards similar action in Surat against other leaders, the legal notice said, farmer leader Parimal Patel “was made to sit in Palsana police station for the whole day on December 11”, adding, cops “forcibly” entered the house of Ramesh Patel on December 9 night and was “rigorously and vigorously interrogated” him, wanting to know if he and other activists were leaving for Delhi.
Then, farmer leaders Dahyabhai Gajera, was forcibly confined in his house at village Upleta, district Rajkot; Chetan Gadhiya of village Pithadiya, district Rajkot, and Girdharbhai Vaghela of village Bhanvad, district Devbhoomi Dwarka, were “detained either in their house in office arrest”, the legal notice said.
Calling police actions “illegal and unconstitutional”, and accusing the BJP government of “misusing its state machinery to thwart attempt on the part of farmers of Gujarat to exercise their right to dissent, right to protest, right of movement in any part of India and freedom of expression”, the legal notice asked the Gujarat authorities not to prevent farmers and farmer leaders from going to Delhi to participate in the ongoing protests.
It also asked the authorities to immediately direct police officials across the state not to enter into the house or office of farmer leaders, not to stand or stay in the premises of their house or office in order to prevent them from leaving for Delhi.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.