Skip to main content

Shutting Srinagar-Jammu highway is "eerily" similar to Israeli policy in Gaza: NAPM

By A Representative
The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has demanded revocation of the Government of India’s bi-weekly ban on civil traffic on the Srinagar-Jammu national highway, calling it an “unfair, undemocratic and draconian step, which goes against the Indian Constitution.” In a statement, it says, “This is yet another in a series of unacceptable measures taken by the Narendra Modi government in the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), the most recent being the closing of a number of link roads to the same highway.”
NAPM continues, “This step amounts to physically trapping an entire population and rendering them immobile”, adding, “Such a step was not taken even during the violence of the 1990s. It is eerily similar to the Israeli policy in Gaza, and reaffirms the suspicion that this government is ideologically attracted to the shameful policies of Israel with regard to Palestine.”
 NAPM in a statement says, the move is “clearly an assault on J&K's economy”, as the highway is “the only roadway link to Kashmir and thus a lifeline to the people of J&K. It will harm the studies of students, the employment of workers, the agriculture of farmers, the business of traders- reducing their access to the highway from three days a week to two, and the well-being of the general public.”
Pointing out that it will “adversely affect tourism, an important sector for the state's economy”, NAPM says, “The upcoming months are also crucial for exports, which will again be affected by this step. The government has cited the need to provide a secure passage to security forces on duty for upcoming elections, but this is only a poor excuse.”
Demanding that the government “take steps towards demilitarising what is recognised by the United Nations as the most militarised zone in the world”, those who have signed the statement include well-known activists Medha Patkar, Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey, Shankar Singh, Dr Binayak Sen, Prafulla Samantara, P Chennaiah, Kavita Srivastava, Sandeep Pandey, Sister Celia, and others.

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.