Skip to main content

Govt of India's public investment that empowers women declining: UN

By Rajiv Shah 
Sharply criticizing the Government of India for the “withdrawal of the state from the public sphere, especially that pertaining to where the majority of Indians and especially women live and labour”, a UN Women-sponsored study says that there has been “declining investment in public provisioning of… goods and services that have a direct impact on … unpaid and paid work of women.”
Especially referring to the provisioning of basic infrastructural facilities that would empower women, the study, still in its draft form, “Invisible Work, Invisible Workers”, says, while there was “a dramatic boost in budget allocations, women specific allocation as percentage of total he Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) budget has fallen from 27.85% in 2014-15 to a pathetic 2.47 today.”
The same is true of water. Thus, study, which contains spot surveys in three states – Maharashtra, Uttarakhand and Telangana – by Action Aid, says, “Allocations for Swacch Bharat Abhiyan have exceeded that for National Rural Drinking Water Policy (NRDWP), reflecting a clear shift in State priorities and an increasing and worrying disconnect between water and sanitation.”
Similarly, the study says, as for budgetary allocation for care services, the implementation of the Maternity Benefit Act, for instance, “appears to have been an utter failure throughout the country, with only 35,035 women benefitting a total of Rs 60.63 crore”, with “regional implementation virtually non-existent: It was “Maharashtra Rs 28 crore to 2078 women, Telangana Rs 3 crore to 604 women, and Uttarakhand Rs. 0.02 crore to 2 women.”
Further says the study, the Central allocation of Rs 2,700 crore in 2017-18 for the Maternity Benefit Programme (MBP), formerly Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahayog Yojana, “found insufficient for the estimated 53 lakhs beneficiaries and hence eligibility has been restricted to one child”, underlining, “What this implies for the future child sex ratio is an issue of deep concern.”
As for the allocations to the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS), “one of the most renowned schemes that has a direct impact on women’s work both paid and unpaid”, the study says, as proportion of the total Ministry of Child and Woman Development (MWCD) budget it is down from 88% in 2014-15 to 80% today.”
“While the number of operational anganwadis “increased by about 3,000, the number of children in pre-school education have fallen by 5%”, adding, as for the Rajiv Gandhi National Creche Scheme it is “in a state of virtual collapse: its share of the MWCD budget has been consistently below one percent; fall in number of functioning creches by more than one fourth; decline in beneficiaries from 6 lakh to 1.6 lakh.”
Pointing towards how the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) Act, a social welfare legislation that aims to benefit workers engaged in building and other construction workers, is patently anti-women, the study says, “The facility of crèches under the BOCW Act is applicable to establishments that employ only ten workers; yet 50 women workers are required for this provision in order to get the benefit.”
“Also”, it says, “The maternity benefit under this law provides for only monetary compensation. There is no clarification relating to the formula or to the eligibility criteria, nor there are any terms and conditions determining payment. The women beneficiaries do not get leave and nor is there any guarantee of employment on return. No medical expenses are given and neither are nursing breaks, while there is no clause relating to avoidance of hazardous jobs.”

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”