Skip to main content

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative
 
The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.
According to the statement, the new law dismantles the core architecture of MGNREGA by replacing a rights-based framework with a budget-capped programme fully controlled by the Union government. Employment, which was earlier guaranteed by law, will now depend on annual budgetary allocations, political priorities and fiscal constraints. The Campaign warned that this shift would disproportionately affect women, landless households, Dalits, Adivasis and migrant workers who rely on rural employment for survival and dignity.
The Campaign rejected the government’s claim that VB–GRAM G represents an improvement because it promises up to 125 days of employment instead of 100. It argued that under MGNREGA, workers rarely received the full entitlement due to delayed payments, low wages and digital exclusions, with average employment remaining far below the legal guarantee. The new Bill, it said, would further reduce actual work availability by imposing state-wise “normative allocations” determined by the Centre, with any expenditure beyond these limits to be borne entirely by state governments.
Concerns were also raised over the revised cost-sharing formula, which shifts wage funding to a 60:40 Centre–state ratio. Under MGNREGA, the Centre bore the entire wage cost and most of the material costs. The Campaign said this change would increase the financial burden on already resource-constrained states, particularly poorer ones, limiting their capacity to provide employment. It further cautioned that a proposed 60-day blackout period during peak agricultural seasons could weaken the bargaining power of rural workers, especially women and other marginalised groups.
The statement criticised the Bill for eroding decentralisation by transferring decision-making powers from Gram Sabhas and Gram Panchayats to the central government. Aligning rural employment works with centrally driven initiatives such as PM Gati Shakti and the National Rural Infrastructure Stack was said to undermine local planning and community participation. The Campaign also flagged concerns over increased reliance on biometric authentication and digital surveillance, citing evidence of exclusion caused by Aadhaar-linked payments and digital attendance systems, and argued that corruption is better addressed through transparent, community-led social audits rather than top-down technological controls.
Highlighting that MGNREGA had already been weakened over the past decade through administrative interventions, the Campaign said the need of the hour was to strengthen the law by raising wage rates, withdrawing mandatory digital requirements, reinforcing social audits and empowering local communities. Instead, it said, the VB–GRAM G Bill centralises authority and undermines hard-won workers’ rights, pushing the country further away from the goal of a genuine Right to Work.
The Right to Food Campaign also objected to the manner in which the legislation was introduced and passed, alleging that it was brought before Parliament without public disclosure or consultation, in violation of established pre-legislative norms. It said the Bill was rushed through Parliament without adequate debate or scrutiny and should have been referred to a parliamentary committee given its far-reaching consequences.
Calling upon the President of India to withhold assent to the legislation, the Campaign urged that MGNREGA be retained and strengthened as a universal, fully funded, rights-based employment guarantee. It expressed solidarity with the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha, trade unions, agricultural workers’ unions, women’s organisations and people’s movements, warning that any attempt to dismantle MGNREGA without workers’ consent would face sustained nationwide resistance.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.  

Mark Tully: The voice that humanised India, yet soft-pedalled Hindutva

By Harsh Thakor*  Sir Mark Tully, the British broadcaster whose voice pierced the fog of Indian history like a monsoon rain, died on January 25, 2026, at 90, leaving behind a legacy that reshaped investigative journalism. Born in the fading twilight of the Raj in 1935, in Tollygunge, Calcutta, Tully's life was a bridge between empires and republics, a testament to how one man's curiosity could humanize a nation's chaos.