Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.
Observers point out that the scheme, which provides a legal guarantee of employment to rural households, proved crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic when millions of migrant workers returned to their villages and depended on it for survival. Despite earlier criticism of the programme by sections of the ruling establishment, MGNREGA functioned as a safety net for rural India during this period.
Questions have also been raised about funding trends, especially by the Socialist Party (India) in a statement issued by its national spokesperson, Basant Hetamsaria. After reaching a high of Rs. 1.11 lakh crore in 2020–21 during the pandemic, allocations have since declined to around Rs. 86,000 crore, even as demand for work under the scheme remains significant. In addition, several states, including West Bengal, have complained that pending central funds have not been released for extended periods, affecting employment opportunities and wage payments for rural workers.
Critics contend that MGNREGA represents core Gandhian values such as the right to work, dignity of labour and social justice, and that altering its name distracts from more pressing issues. They have urged the government to focus instead on addressing states’ grievances, ensuring timely fund releases, increasing wages, expanding the number of guaranteed workdays and providing stable budgetary support. They called on the government to strengthen rather than dilute the scheme.
Comments