Skip to main content

Crucial to managing wildfire risk: Indigenous knowledge with modern approaches

By Rahul Sejwal* 

Wildfire risks could be reduced by strengthening Indigenous knowledge in management strategies, according to new research from the University of East Anglia (UEA), UK.
Combining traditional knowledge and techniques with modern approaches, Indigenous communities in Bolivia are finding new ways of dealing with increasingly flammable landscapes that threaten their lives and livelihoods.
Studying how the Monkoxɨ indigenous people use and manage fire in the dry forest, shrublands and savannah of the Bolivian lowlands, the researchers found they not only protect their territories but also ensure more political self-determination. In doing so, the Monkoxɨ are changing the terms of the conversation about the role of indigenous knowledge in wildfire management.
Dr Iokiñe Rodríguez, an associate professor in UEA’s School of International Development, led the research, with Mirna Inturias from Bolivia’s NUR University, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, and Elmar Masay from the Union of Indigenous Communities of Lomerío (CICOL).
Dr Rodríguez said: “Under this approach, rather than Indigenous knowledge being included, integrated or incorporated into Western-driven fire management policies, Indigenous knowledge and agency are at the centre of the fire management strategy, and modern technical knowledge serves as a complement to it.
“This is a unique case of intercultural dialogue about fire management being driven by Indigenous peoples themselves.”
The study, ‘Decolonizing wildfire risk management: Indigenous responses to fire criminalization policies and increasingly flammable forest landscapes in Lomerío, Bolivia’, is published today in the journal Environmental Science and Policy.
In 2020 the Union of Indigenous Communities of Lomerío (CICOL) initiated a series of activities to ensure local control of wildfire risk management in the territory. These included a written burning protocol, a fire monitoring programme, water basin and forest conservation policies, participatory research conducted by Indigenous researchers about the use of fire in Lomerío, and cultural revitalization strategies.
In many places, current fire risk management strategies reinforce a historical trend of top-down and externally led interventions, taking away control of the management of their territories from Indigenous peoples and silencing their own ways of dealing with the hazards brought about by climate change.
The use of fire by Indigenous communities is often criminalized by national authorities, who lack sufficient knowledge about local responses to wildfire risk management. This way of framing the response to climate security not only blames those that are often least responsible for the current increase in wildfires, but also fails to incorporate them as stakeholders in potential solutions.
Fire is central in practically all activities of the family economy and the daily life of the Monkoxɨ, 7,000 people whose lives rely on the forest and forest products. Fire is their main tool in agriculture, but they also rely on hunting, fishing and the collection of wild plants and honey – which are also affected by fire cycles.
Similar to many other forest-dependent Indigenous people in the Americas, the Monkoxɨ clear and cultivate an area of one to two hectares of forest, moving every two years to new areas to allow the soil to recover and to preserve natural resources and biodiversity. To clear forest vegetation before planting, the Monkoxɨ use fire – an ancestral method passed down through the generations that helps to fertilize and aerate the soil.
Under the CICOL approach, Indigenous knowledge and agency are at the centre of the fire management strategy, and Western technical knowledge serves as a complement to it. This is a unique case of intercultural dialogue about fire management being driven by Indigenous peoples themselves.
The research also shows that due to the multiple causes of wildfires, there are no simple solutions to the ‘fire problem’. On the contrary, solutions need to be diverse.
Dr Rodríguez said: “This is why the Monkoxɨ are simultaneously developing strategies aimed at regulating, controlling, preventing and monitoring fire use, while simultaneously protecting communal sources of life like forests and water springs and helping to reconnect the youth to their territory through cultural and knowledge revitalization.”
Monkoxɨ have shown that wildfire management goes beyond the management of fire itself and must include also efforts to protect communal goods, as well as to reconnect the youth to their territories.
The research also looked at ways of passing down ancestral knowledge to Monkoxɨ youth, who increasingly spend prolonged periods in urban areas working or studying.
Dr Rodríguez said: “Ensuring younger generations stay connected to their territory and their knowledge system, and are capable of managing their lands according to Monkoxɨ principles, are key to the successful self-governance of Lomerío.”
The study, ‘Decolonizing wildfire risk management: Indigenous responses to fire criminalization policies and increasingly flammable forest landscapes in Lomerío, Bolivia’, is published on 21 June 2023 in the journal Environmental Science and Policy.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.