Modi’s effort for world peace incomplete if he fails to espouse the cause of Tibetans

By NS Venkataraman*
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has met Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky in Hiroshima , Japan on 20th May,2023 and Mr. Modi has promised that India would do it’s best to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. This is a reassuring statement , since India has good relations with both Ukraine and Russia and is in a position to mediate between both these countries in a just manner.
Of course, Mr. Modi’s assurance to facilitate peace between both these countries is in sharp contrast to the announced efforts of Chinese President, since China itself is widely perceived to have territorial ambitions and many people may think that China promising to mediate between Ukraine and Russia is similar to devil quoting scripture.
What is more interesting is that Mr.Modi was reported to have told Ukraine’s President “ You know much more than any of us the pain of war but I could very well understand your pain and the pain of the Ukrainian people when our children narrated the circumstances in your country after they were brought back last year”.
While it is gratifying to know that Mr. Modi understands the pain of Ukrainians, where millions of Ukrainians have suffered enormously due to the war launched by Russia against Ukraine and have been forced to leave the mother land to go to other countries as refugees , one cannot but think that Mr. Modi does not seem to have said at anytime about his knowing the pain of Tibetans, when Tibet was attacked and occupied by China. Tibetans were massacred by China, when China entered Tibet forcing thousands of Tibetans to leave their motherland and go to India as refugees.
Pain of Tibetans are no less than that of Ukrainians.
The present ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine is taking place on the Ukrainian soil and airspace and not on that of Russia. This, obviously reveals the fact that Russia is the aggressor. Russia has been mercilessly bombing and attacking Ukraine and in the process large number of Ukrainians have lost their lives. There is really no difference between the act of Russia in Ukraine and that of China in Tibet.
While Ukraine is getting sympathy and support from several countries now, this was not the case in the case of Tibetans when they were mercilessly attacked by China. Tibet was left high and dry and the world conscience appeared to have become silent. Till today, justice has not been done to Tibetans and China is ruling the Tibet region with iron fist and is virtually keeping Tibet out of the sight of the world.
It is high time that UNO as well as several countries and the world community committed to the cause of peace and fair play should view the Tibetan issue with the same perspective and concern as they do in the case of Ukraine. Unfortunately, China appears to have been allowed to have the last laugh as far as the Tibetan issue is concerned.MThousands of Tibetan refugees are now In India without knowing when they would get their motherland back.
While Mr. Modi’s efforts to bring peace between Russia and Ukraine would be in the interest of the world, why not Mr. Modi talk of the plight and pain of Tibetans too? India too has been attacked by China several times causing loss of lives and China is occupying several thousands of kilometres of Indian territory at present.
It is true that China would not allow any peace move by Mr. Modi in the case of Tibet, However, it would be good if Mr. Modi would start speaking about the pain of Tibetans , which certainly he would understand and wake up the conscience of the world towards the Tibetan cause. Mr. Modi’s claimed efforts towards the world peace by trying to bring accord between Ukraine and Russia would be an incomplete exercise, if he would fail to espouse the cause of Tibetans and highlight the pain of Tibetans.
----
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog