Skip to main content

Publicity stunt? Begun in 2021, Govt of India scheme fails to bring 'smile' on beggars' face

By Harasankar Adhikari 
The history of begging indicated that in primitive societies, there was no problem with begging because small groups of relatives used to live together and support one another. But the phenomenon of begging emerged in association with private poverty. In fact, it is the root cause of inequality and injustice.
In the early civilizations, almsgiving was considered a holy deed and begging an honourable act. In traditional Indian society, beggary was never a problem because the socio-economic system had built-in safeguards for its prevention. Previously, the religious faith of the people encouraged begging in India, believing that it was one way to please the Almighty, but now it has become a profession since no physical or mental effort is required to earn one’s bread. Now, begging is one of the most endemic, multifaceted social problems of great magnitude.
It is very poignant in developing countries, particularly in India. A significant number of people are involved in begging, and the heavier the burden on the working population, the lesser the usage of human resources for constructive human development. Therefore, begging has become the mainstay for a quite large section of the population.
It is because of a number of factors, such as poverty (real or fraudulent poverty), religion, physical disability, culture, national disaster, civil war, bad habits (drug, alcohol, and gambling dependencies), family heritage, uncontrolled rural to urban migration, psychiatric disabilities and disorders, etc.
It is undoubtedly due to the absence of any means of livelihood, a large number of people were driven to begging, some temporarily and some permanently. The Supreme Court observed, "It is a socio-economic problem, and people are forced to beg to eke out their livelihood due to the absence of education and employment."
The Government of India recently considered begging a burden for the development of the country, and it is a matter of shame for the government. Many programmes and policies have failed to encounter the problems of poverty and unemployment associated with it. Recognising this, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment recently came up with an umbrella scheme, SMILE: Support for Marginalised Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise for the Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Persons Engaged in the Act of Begging.
Till date, beggars, irrespective of age, sex, are in a static position. They beg in crowded places, places of worship, railway stations
It covers several comprehensive measures, including welfare measures for persons who are engaged in the act of begging, with a focus extensively on rehabilitation, provision of medical facilities, counselling, education, skill development, economic linkages, etc., with the support of state governments, UTs, Community Based Organizations (CBOs), institutions, and others.
But has it brought a "smile" to the faces of beggars in India? How and where has it been implemented, and what are the impacts of this scheme?
According to the Ministry, this scheme was to start in 2021. But to date, beggars, irrespective of age, sex, etc., are in a static position. They are begging in crowded places, places of worship, railway stations, and others. There is no awareness and mobilisation camp undertaken, at least at Kolkata metropolis, while the number of beggars has increased in the aftermath of the pandemic.
So, is it only a scheme for publicity for the government, and is it enough to strengthen the strategic face value of the government? When will the government wake up? Is it after the 18th general election?

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.