Skip to main content

Refusing to follow Uttarakhand HC order, top TV channel 'vitiating' communal situation

By A Representative
 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), in an open letter to the Uttarakhand Chief Secretary, with copy to the Director General of Police and the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, has regretted that the Sudarshan TV and its editor Suresh Chahvanke are refusing to comply with the order passed by Uttarakhand High Court to cancel the proposed Mahapanchayat, apprehending it might further deteriorate the already vitiated communal situation in the State.
The order dated June 15, 2023 not only bars the Mahapanchayat but also prohibits to engage with any interviews on it on social media/media, it said, adding, “While passing this order, the Hon’ble Court noted that debates on television or social media with allegations and counter allegations could cause potential flare ups in the communal situation and hence stated that all concerned parties are to refrain from debates in the media to normalise the situation.”
Asking the State chief secretary and the DGP as also other concerned officials “to advise the organizers of Mahapanchayat and bring the aforesaid order to their specific notice that they are barred from interacting with the media or giving interviews”, PUCL said, the government should make available a copy of the order to all media houses through a press release that the media houses cooperate in ensuring the maintenance of peace and harmony.”
The PUCL underlined, “We are also writing this letter asking you to discharge your constitutional and statutory duty by filing a complaint against Sudarshan TV”, regretting, “The CMD and editor of Sudarshan TV Suresh Chavhanke, has made a public announcement through twitter in defiance of the order ...” 
The editor in his announcement said, “Purola, Uttarkashi’s restricted mahapanchayat will take place in the Sudarshan News Studio Live. The government did not give space in a ground but we will give it platform on TV that too with politicians”.
“If the Mahapanchayat is allowed to air live on TV media, it is likely to not only the pose the threat to right to life of Muslims in the Uttarakhand but across India since it can be circulated with ease using the electronic medium”, PUCL said, adding, “The channel is in blatant disregard of the Hon’ble Court’s order, preparing to offer a platform to the alleged organisers/members of the offending Mahapanchayat in order to further stoke communal hatred.”

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

When Sardar Patel opposed reservation, asked Scheduled Castes to give up their “inferiority” complex

Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel By Dr Hari Desai* It is ironical indeed. Though Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was opposed to any kind of reservation in the government jobs and education as well as in the legislatures (like Mahatma Gandhi), even today his name is being drawn in controversies in the present-day agitations demanding reservation in India.

Activists Akriti, Satyam Verma face NSA in Noida protest case: PUCL

By A Representative   Human rights activist Kavita Shrivastava has alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Police is invoking the National Security Act (NSA) against two activists associated with Mazdoor Bigul in connection with the Noida workers’ protest case, even as labour unrest continues to spread across industrial belts in several northern states.