Skip to main content

GoI 'violating' Supreme Court directions: Information commissioners' appointment

By A Representative
Well-known right to information (RTI) activists Anjali Bhardwaj, Commodore (Retd) Lokesh Batra and Amrita Johri have alleged that the Government of India (GoI) is continuing to violate Supreme Court directions on appointment of information commissioners to the Central Information Commission (CIC), India’s RTI watchdog.
Referring to the status report dated April 24, 2020 filed by the GoI in the ongoing Supreme Court case regarding non-appointment of information commissioners and lack of transparency in the appointment process, they said, in the last hearing on December 16, 2019, the Supreme Court had directed the GoI to complete the process of appointment of information commissioners to the CIC within a period of three months.
“Even though the time limit set by the Supreme Court expired on March 16, 2020, the Central government has failed to fill the vacant posts”, the activists, who filed a petition in the Supreme Court for transparent appointment of information commissions, said in a statement.
“As of today (April 29, 2020), four posts of information commissioners continue to be vacant even as the backlog of appeals/complaints has risen to nearly 36,000 up from 33,701 at the time of the last hearing in December 2019”, they said.
Pointing out that in December 2019, the CIC was functioning with seven commissioners, including the chief, and four posts of information commissioners were vacant, the activists said, “On January 11, 2020, the then chief information commissioner retired. Till March 5, 2020, the CIC was functioning without a chief and with only six commissioners.”
“On March 6, a serving information commissioner, Bimal Julka, was appointed as the Chief while Amita Pandove was appointed as an information commissioner. Therefore, four posts continue to be vacant despite the directions of the Supreme Court”, they added.
Other than names of members of search committee and advertisement, no other details have been placed in public domain
“Further”, the activists said, “The Supreme Court had directed the government to ensure transparency in the process of appointment by putting up the names of the members of the Search Committee and complying with the earlier directions regarding timely and transparency appointments to the CIC given in its February 15, 2019 judgment.”
“The judgment inter-alia required disclosure of the agenda and minutes of search and selection committee meetings, criteria adopted by the search committee for shortlisting candidates, the advertisement issued for the vacancies, the list of applicants, notification of appointments, file notings and correspondence related to appointments”, they added.
According to the activists, “It is pertinent to note that other than the names of the members of the search committee and the advertisement, no other details have been placed in the public domain in violation of the directions of the Supreme Court.”
The activists commented, “Despite the blatant violation of the order in terms of four vacancies still remaining, point 5 of the status report of the Central government states that ‘the process of appointment in respect of Information Commissioners in Central Information Commission has been completed within three months as directed by this Court in its Order dated December 16, 2019.”

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”