Legal collective urges revocation of ban on Adivasi group in Chhattisgarh

By A Representative
A group of 100 lawyers and legal professionals from across India has issued a powerful appeal to the President of India, the Governor of Chhattisgarh, and the Chief Minister, demanding the immediate revocation of the ban on Moolvasi Bachao Manch (MBM), a grassroots Adivasi rights group. The appeal also calls for the release of all its jailed members and the repeal of the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, 2005 (CSPSA), which the collective terms “draconian” and unconstitutional.
The appeal, issued by the National Alliance for Justice, Accountability and Rights (NAJAR), denounces the October 2024 declaration of MBM as an “unlawful organization” under the CSPSA. According to NAJAR, this ban is an attack on the right to freedom of association and reflects an alarming trend of criminalizing peaceful, constitutionally protected activities by Adivasi communities in Scheduled Areas.
The legal professionals’ concerns stem from the May 3, 2025 re-arrest of MBM members Suneeta Pottam and Dasru Podiyam by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), despite their prior judicial custody in unrelated cases. Both were remanded to five days of interrogation under a 2023 UAPA case before being returned to custody. This same case had earlier led to the arrest of MBM’s former president, Raghu Midiyami, and implicated members Gajendra Madavi and Laxman Kunjam.
NAJAR asserts that these arrests are part of a concerted strategy to incarcerate individuals merely for their past association with MBM, which had dissolved after the ban. MBM was founded in 2021 in the wake of the Silger firing—when security forces killed four Adivasis protesting the construction of paramilitary camps. From its inception, MBM operated openly, using petitions, public meetings, padyatras, and sit-ins to advocate for forest and land rights, Gram Sabha consent, and justice for state violence, relying on constitutional frameworks like PESA, FRA, and the Fifth Schedule.
The lawyers contend that at least 30 MBM members have been arrested in false cases. The first enforcement of the ban reportedly occurred in November 2024, when two members were detained simply for organizing a village meeting—without any allegations of incitement or violence. Even after MBM’s dissolution, its former members continue to face harassment and arrest, based only on their prior association.
The appeal highlights the case of Suneeta Pottam, a prominent activist who has been active in campaigns against displacement and militarization in Bastar. She has worked with organizations like Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression (WSS) and the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), and was acquitted in 9 out of 12 previous cases. Her release was reportedly obstructed by a new arrest under the UAPA. Dasru Podiyam, a young organizer from Bijapur, faces a similar fate, leading to fears that former MBM members are being deliberately targeted through prolonged legal harassment.
According to NAJAR, this crackdown coincides with increasing public outrage over custodial torture, extrajudicial killings, and rampant militarization in Bastar. They argue that the ban is being used to shield these actions from scrutiny by delegitimizing Adivasi dissent as anti-national.
The government’s rationale for the ban—alleging MBM was instigating people against “development works”—was strongly refuted. The signatories argue that MBM’s resistance to road and security camp construction was grounded in legally recognized rights under the Constitution, PESA, and FRA, which require prior Gram Sabha consent for development projects in Scheduled Areas. They point out that adivasi communities, who have traditionally protected forests, are now being dispossessed in the name of development, violating human rights and contributing to ecological damage.
The lawyers emphasized that the CSPSA allows the state to outlaw organizations without requiring any proof of violent activity, lacks judicial oversight, and criminalizes mere association—making it incompatible with constitutional democracy.
Among the prominent signatories to the letter are Senior Advocate Gayatri Singh (Bombay High Court), Advocate Indira Unninayar (Supreme Court and Delhi High Court), Advocate Purbayan Chakraborty (West Bengal), Advocate Mini Mathew (Mumbai/Goa), Advocate Ritesh Dhar Dubey (New Delhi), Advocate Afsar Jahan (Telangana High Court), Advocate Vertika Mani (New Delhi), Advocate Rohin Bhatt (Delhi), and Advocate Dr. Shalu Nigam (Delhi NCR)
The letter concludes with five demands to the authorities: revoke the ban on MBM, release all its imprisoned members, repeal the CSPSA, stop the criminalization of Adivasi protests, and end all surveillance and harassment of former MBM members.
Calling this a test of constitutional fidelity, the signatories urged immediate action to restore the rule of law and protect the democratic rights of Adivasi communities in Bastar and across India’s Scheduled Areas.

Comments

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks.

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights.

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor* Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram* April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

From Manesar to Noida: Workers take to streets for bread, media looks away

By Sunil Kumar* Across several states in India, a workers’ movement is gathering momentum. This is not a movement born of luxury or ambition, nor a demand for power-sharing within the state. At its core lies a stark and basic plea: the right to survive with dignity—adequate food, and wages sufficient to afford it.

Cracks in Gujarat model? Surat’s exodus reveals precarity behind prosperity claims

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The return of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, particularly from Gujarat, was inevitable. Gujarat has long been showcased as the epitome of “infrastructure” and the business-friendly Modi model. Yet, when governments become business-friendly, they require the poor to serve them—while keeping them precarious, unable to stabilize, demand fair wages, or assert their rights. The agenda is clear: workers must remain grateful for whatever crumbs the Seth ji offers.

Catholic union opposes FCRA amendments, warns of threat to Church institutions

By A Representative The All India Catholic Union (AICU) has raised serious concerns over what it describes as growing threats to religious freedom, minority rights, and constitutional safeguards in India, warning that recent policy and legislative trends could undermine the country’s secular and federal framework.

Counterview

Search This Blog