Skip to main content

The forgotten fields: Reclaiming agriculture in the march of development

By Vikas Meshram 
No matter how advanced or complex the world becomes, food remains an unshakable necessity for human survival. Whether in technologically advanced nations or in developing countries striving to catch up, every individual depends on food. Yet, as the global narrative of development unfolds, agriculture—the source of this essential need—has been increasingly sidelined. This shift is not only alarming but also dangerous, as it threatens both human health and environmental balance.
Over the past four to five decades, global and national populations have soared, while cultivable land has steadily declined. The relentless expansion of infrastructure—railways, highways, industries, airports, urban housing, schools, and hospitals—has come at the cost of forests, ecosystems, and fertile farmland. As cities swell, the fields that once fed them shrink.
A 2024 Global Report on Food Crises reveals that approximately 295 million people worldwide are facing acute food insecurity, a number expected to balloon to 943 million by 2025. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates the hidden annual cost of global agriculture at $12 trillion, much of it linked to unhealthy diets and ecological degradation.
India is no exception. The country ranked 105th out of 127 in the 2024 Global Hunger Index, with a score of 27.3—placing it in the “serious” category. This reflects not just a hunger crisis but a deeper systemic failure in our agricultural and food systems.
At the same time, the demand for food has grown in line with the population. In response, governments and farmers have been pushed to maximize yields—often by any means necessary. Since the 1970s, chemical fertilizers and pesticides have become the cornerstone of modern farming, heavily promoted and now virtually indispensable. So entrenched is their use that many farmers, even if willing, find it nearly impossible to transition away.
The result has been devastating. Chemical-heavy farming has stripped vital nutrients from food grains. Even as India produced 329.7 million tonnes of food grains in 2024—thanks largely to chemical inputs—the nutritional quality of that produce has deteriorated. India’s fertilizer market relies 85% on chemical products, with organic inputs making up just 15%. Urea is the most widely used, and since 2009–10, its use has risen by a third. Meanwhile, its cost has increased only 16.5% due to subsidies, deepening farmers’ dependence.
Farmers, accustomed to this system, continue with chemical-based agriculture because it promises short-term gains. Government warehouses overflow with grain. Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) have climbed. Subsidies cover seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and other inputs. The government purchases a substantial share of produce annually, and below-poverty-line families receive subsidized food.
But this surface-level convenience masks a troubling contradiction.
As chemically-treated crops become the norm, public health is deteriorating. Diseases—both curable and chronic—are on the rise. The medical industry, research sector, and pharmaceutical companies may benefit, but society at large bears the cost in terms of weakened immunity and rising healthcare expenses. The development model, in its current form, traps us in a cycle of short-term fixes and long-term harm.
Even as we celebrate India’s emergence as the world’s fourth-largest economy, overtaking Japan with a GDP of $4 trillion and eyeing Germany’s spot by 2028, these milestones ring hollow if they rest on an unbalanced foundation—overreliance on imports, consumerism, and service industries. True development must be rooted in sustainability, with agriculture at its core.
Today, over 60% of India’s population still depends on agriculture for livelihood. Yet, despite subsidies and free food distribution, many find it impossible to continue farming. The projected growth of India’s food processing sector to $535 billion by 2025–26 further highlights the problem: while profits skyrocket, they accrue mostly to corporations, not farmers.
There is, however, hope on the horizon. India’s organic fertilizer market is expected to grow to $935 million by 2031. This signals a critical opportunity to shift toward natural farming. The government must prioritize this transition—redirecting subsidies from chemical to organic inputs, training farmers in traditional and sustainable methods, and supporting natural soil enrichment.
Key steps include:
- Promoting widespread soil testing and natural nutrient replenishment
- Supporting large-scale bio-fertilizer production
- Creating direct farmer-to-market links to cut out exploitative middlemen
In this time of climate stress, rising disease, and ecological collapse, India must return to its agrarian roots—not as a retreat, but as a visionary step forward. Sustainable agriculture is not a luxury; it is a necessity for meaningful progress. Only by re-centering farming in our development model can we build a truly resilient, healthy, and equitable society.

Comments

TRENDING

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

From non-alignment to strategic partnership: India's ideological shift toward Israel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  India's historical foreign policy maintained a notable duality: offering sanctuary to persecuted Jewish communities dating back centuries, while simultaneously supporting Palestinian self-determination as an expression of its broader anti-colonial foreign policy commitments. The gradual shift in Indian foreign policy under Hindutva-aligned governance — moving toward a strategic partnership with Israel while reducing substantive engagement with the Palestinian cause — raises legitimate questions about ideological motivation and geopolitical consequence.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Indian ecologist urges United Nations to probe alleged Epstein links within UN ranks

By A Representative   A senior Indian ecologist and long-time United Nations environmental negotiator, Dr. S. Faizi of Thiruvananthapuram, has written to António Guterres, urging the United Nations to launch a high-level investigation into alleged links between certain current and former UN officials and the late American financier Jeffrey Epstein, following disclosures of email communications by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.