Skip to main content

Why Modi isn't advising ‘It's not the time for war’ to Netanyahu like he did to Putin?

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey* 
After having pounded Gaza for over three months killing more than 26,000 Palestinians, during the course of which Israel also attacked Children’s hospitals and refugee camps in West Bank, on the pretext of flushing out Hamas fighters from there, Israel, with the help of its western allies, is doing the most unthinkable thing – trying to stop the humanitarian help to the beleaguered citizens of Gaza reaching through United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.
If in the opinion of International Court of Justice what is happening in Gaza is not genocide yet - it merely said that Israel’s conduct in the Gaza war risked acts of genocide - then this effort of Israel would certainly convince the world that indeed Israel is committing genocide by preventing food and medical aid reach the hapless Gazans.
During the ICJ hearing, Israel's Prime Minister - Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been almost universally reviled globally and within Israel, reiterated that Israel would continue to bomb Gaza regardless of the ICJ verdict, or ongoing global outrage at his genocidal military campaign. He reiterated the "No one will stop us, not The Hague, not the axis of evil and not anyone else".
To clarify to the confused billions, the "Axis of Evil" he was referring to was not Israel, the US, UK, and the western governments but the international community’s near universal condemnation of and pressure to end the Israel’s crimes in Gaza.Netanyahu furthered claimed that he would continue the heinous massacres till the population of Gaza thinned out to about 200,000 from its current 2.2 Million: Netanyahu’s Goal for Gaza: “Thin” Population “to a Minimum”.
South Africa’s courageous decision to take Israel to the Hague has given a legal forum for the international advocacy for a ceasefire, and beyond that, advocacy to end the ongoing Nakba, Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians since 1948. Both South Africa and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention which gives the ICJ the jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty.
Ironically, the Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9 December 1948 and signified the international community's commitment to prevent the atrocities committed against Jews in the Holocaust from repeating - for any group - under the rallying cry of “never again”. Israel has ratified the convention.
Israel thumbs its nose at this convention, perpetrating the same crime committed against the very people in whose name it now claims to act. Jewish groups like JVP and Rabbis for Ceasefire have vocally protested against Israel, insisting that never again means never again for anyone and that genocide will not be committed in their name.
At least a dozen countries backed the South African legal team - Belgium, Maldives, Namibia, Bolivia, Turkey, Jordan, Malaysia, Pakistan Columbia, Bangladesh, Brazil, and more than 50 countries of the OIC and the Arab League. The Indian government -- probably wary of its participative background of pogroms in Gujarat and its occupation of Kashmir -- stayed noncommittal on the sidelines. A shameful episode which many of us noticed.
The ICJ has ruled that Israel must take all possible measures to prevent acts as outlined in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention. This entails not killing Palestinians, not causing physical or psychological harm to them, not inflicting living conditions which will be fatal, etc. Israeli military has been told to desist from such actions. Israel is to ensure delivery of basic services and essential humanitrian aid to civilians in Gaza.
Within a month Israel has been asked to submit a compliance report. United States has seen this as a vindication of its decision to support Israel’s right of self-defense in wake of the 7 October, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel. But the side which has been defending before, since 1947, and after 7 October is mostly Palestine, not Israel which has been on the offensive more often than not.
Purchases of surveillance software from Israel and Adani's business interests in Haifa port make India's position morally indefensible
ICJ ruling is an opportunity for the Israeli Government to see what it is doing it nothing short of genocide, 75 years of apartheid and ethnic cleansing, and it must use the ICJ judgement to put an end to the atrocities it has been committing on Palestinians. 
Israeli government has used horrific munitions such as white phosphorus and starvation by preventing aid from reaching Gazans through the Rafah border making it a war criminal under the Geneva convention. It should not make the matters worse by now targeting UNRWA and choking whatever little is reaching Gaza in the form of relief and medical aid.
Role of Indian government now, after taking a clear cut position against Israel since its creation in 1947 to about four decades, is equally condemnable for being complicit in this genocide -- silent against the acts of Israel, refusing to vocally call out Israel's actions. India is conspicuous by its absence among the countries supporting South Africa in ICJ.
Narendra Modi has not offered the ‘it is not the time for war’ advice to Benjamin Netanyahu that he had for Vladimir Putin when Russia attacked Ukraine. The Indian people are aware of the Home Minister Amit Shah's purchases of surveillance software products such as Pegasus and Predator from Israel, and its oligarchic backer Adani's business interests in Haifa port. That makes India's position morally indefensible.
There is a need to stand with the Palestinian people, the people of Gaza and the resistance against its occupiers -- according to UN Resolution 2625 of 1970, Resolution 3314 of the UNGA, and UNGA resolution 37/43, Palestinians have the right to armed resistance. Israel as an occupying force has no right to self-defense. 
Israel can only be condemned in the harshest possible terms and India for reversing its long standing support for Palestine and not standing up on the right side of history.
---
*Venkatesh Narayanan is a self-employed professional; Sandeep Pandey is General Secretary of Socialist Party (India), who recently returned his Magsaysay Award and degrees from U.S. universities in opposition to U.S. support of Israel in its onslaught on Gaza

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Ahmedabad's Sabarmati riverfront under scrutiny after Subhash Bridge damage

By Rosamma Thomas*  Large cracks have appeared on Subhash Bridge across the Sabarmati in Ahmedabad, close to the Gandhi Ashram . Built in 1973, this bridge, named after Subhash Chandra Bose , connects the eastern and western parts of the city and is located close to major commercial areas. The four-lane bridge has sidewalks for pedestrians, and is vital for access to Ashram Road , Ellis Bridge , Gandhinagar and the Sabarmati Railway Station .
2 comments
»

Farewell to Robin Smith, England’s Lionhearted Warrior Against Pace

By Harsh Thakor*  Robin Smith, who has died at the age of 62, was among the most adept and convincing players of fast bowling during an era when English cricket was in decline and pace bowling was at its most lethal. Unwavering against the tormenting West Indies pace attack or the relentless Australians, Smith epitomised courage and stroke-making prowess. His trademark shot, an immensely powerful square cut, made him a scourge of opponents. Wearing a blue England helmet without a visor or grille, he relished pulling, hooking and cutting the quicks. 
Post a Comment
»

No action yet on complaint over assault on lawyer during Tirunelveli public hearing

By A Representative   A day after a detailed complaint was filed seeking disciplinary action against ten lawyers in Tirunelveli for allegedly assaulting human rights lawyer Dr. V. Suresh, no action has yet been taken by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, according to the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).
Post a Comment
»

Latur’s quiet rebel: Dr Suryanarayan Ransubhe and his war on Manuvad

By Ravi Ranjan*  In an India still fractured by caste, religion, and language, where narrow loyalties repeatedly threaten to tear the nation apart, Rammanohar Lohia once observed that the true leader of the bahujans is one under whose banner even non-bahujans feel proud to march. The remark applies far beyond politics. In the literary-cultural and social spheres as well, only a person armed with unflinching historical consciousness and the moral courage to refuse every form of personality worship—including worship of oneself—can hope to touch the weak pulse of the age and speak its bitter truths without fear or favour. 
Post a Comment
»

Differences in 2002 and 2025 SIR revision procedures spark alarm in Gujarat

By A Representative   Civil rights groups and electoral reform activists have raised serious concerns over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Gujarat and 11 other states, alleging that the newly enforced requirements could lead to large-scale deletion of legitimate voters, particularly those unable to furnish documentation linking them to the 2002 electoral list.
Post a Comment
»

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.
Post a Comment
»

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...
Post a Comment
»

From crime to verdict: The 27-year journey that 'rewarded' the destroyers of Babri Masjid

By Shamsul Islam    Thirty-three years ago, on December 6, 1992, a 16th-century mosque was reduced to rubble by a frenzied mob orchestrated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its political fronts. The demolition was not a spontaneous outburst of Hindu sentiment; it was the meticulously planned culmination of a hate campaign that branded Indian Muslims as “Babur-ki-aulad” and the Babri Masjid as a symbol of historical humiliation. 
Post a Comment
»