Skip to main content

Supreme Court Bar Association letter to CJI 'meant to defame' protesting farmers

By Prem Singh* 

Have we ceased to be a wakeful and sensitive civil society and instead have become the horns of parties, leaders and governments? Whatever profession we are in, have we lost all respect for our responsibility and dignity? 
It is understandable that a pro-corporate government should launch a campaign to defame the farmers from the very first day of its agitation against the government's apathy to their long-pending demands. Because it considers the people of the country, especially the hardworking farmers, labourers, artisans, unemployed and underemployed, not as citizens but as subjects who live at the mercy of the government. 
But the professional noblemen of the civil society should defame the farmers in an organizational manner -- this explains our fall as a civil society. 
It is a matter of utmost regret that the president of the Supreme Court Bar Association has written a letter to the Chief Justice demanding that he take suo motu cognizance of the “erring” farmers who are forcibly trying to enter Delhi in a bid to create nuisance and disturb the daily life of citizens. He further asked the Chief Justice to take action against them. 
It seems that the action taken by the Haryana government is not enough for the bar Association president. The letter is quite elaborate, which has been written without hiding the intentions behind it. That means the letter writer does not care about the responsibility and dignity of his position and status. 
It is yet to be known what the Chief Justice and the Supreme Court will say on this letter of the Bar Association president and the demand made in it. Or what stand will other office bearers and member lawyers of the Bar Association take. 
However, it can be inferred that from the very first day, the government has made a strategy to mobilize various professional organizations of the civil society to defame the farmers. It is possible that after the letter of the Supreme Court Bar Association, organizations of some other professions may come forward with similar letters. 
Perhaps the government does not have full confidence in the police and central security forces deployed in large numbers in Haryana and Delhi; its strategy of dividing farmers into provinces, organizations and castes; and the skill and strength of its media management. It seems that this time the government has decided to wage a decisive fight against farmers and their demands. 
Government has made a strategy to mobilize various professional organizations of the civil society to defame the farmers
Even before the Lok Sabha elections 2024, the Prime Minister has announced his third term in the speech at the Red Fort and then in the Parliament. He has also already expressed his determination to do some “big” work in his third term. 
The work to be done in the third term may also include the “big” task of implementing the three withdrawn agricultural laws by making them more pro-corporate. While withdrawing the laws, the government had openly stated that the laws would be implemented when the opportunity arises.
Bharat Ratna awarded to Karpoori Thakur, Chaudhary Charan Singh and MS Swaminathan is the government's effort to accomplish the same big task. The “heirs” of Karpoori Thakur and Chaudhary Charan Singh will drag the farmers and labourers into the government's fold. Those who do not come will be thrashed by the security forces and the farmers themselves! 
The farmers' movement of 2020-21 is an example of this. Around 750 farmers died in that movement. An elected BJP MLA from Uttar Pradesh had openly called for shooting 'anti-national' farmer agitators. And along with BJP supporters at Ghazipur border, he had planned to teach a lesson to farmer leader Rakesh Tikait. Surrounded by all sides, Rakesh Tikait had tears in his eyes.
It should be hoped that this time the farmers, who struggle for their livelihood through agriculture, a profession that was once considered the best (uttam) and now the lowest (adham), will put their hands around the neck of the unbridled corporate-horse and control it firmly. And, like the movement of 2020-21, they will not let all the energy dissipate.
 ---
*Associated with socialist movement; former teacher of Delhi University and fellow of Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Ahmedabad's Sabarmati riverfront under scrutiny after Subhash Bridge damage

By Rosamma Thomas*  Large cracks have appeared on Subhash Bridge across the Sabarmati in Ahmedabad, close to the Gandhi Ashram . Built in 1973, this bridge, named after Subhash Chandra Bose , connects the eastern and western parts of the city and is located close to major commercial areas. The four-lane bridge has sidewalks for pedestrians, and is vital for access to Ashram Road , Ellis Bridge , Gandhinagar and the Sabarmati Railway Station .

Farewell to Robin Smith, England’s Lionhearted Warrior Against Pace

By Harsh Thakor*  Robin Smith, who has died at the age of 62, was among the most adept and convincing players of fast bowling during an era when English cricket was in decline and pace bowling was at its most lethal. Unwavering against the tormenting West Indies pace attack or the relentless Australians, Smith epitomised courage and stroke-making prowess. His trademark shot, an immensely powerful square cut, made him a scourge of opponents. Wearing a blue England helmet without a visor or grille, he relished pulling, hooking and cutting the quicks. 

No action yet on complaint over assault on lawyer during Tirunelveli public hearing

By A Representative   A day after a detailed complaint was filed seeking disciplinary action against ten lawyers in Tirunelveli for allegedly assaulting human rights lawyer Dr. V. Suresh, no action has yet been taken by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, according to the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).

Latur’s quiet rebel: Dr Suryanarayan Ransubhe and his war on Manuvad

By Ravi Ranjan*  In an India still fractured by caste, religion, and language, where narrow loyalties repeatedly threaten to tear the nation apart, Rammanohar Lohia once observed that the true leader of the bahujans is one under whose banner even non-bahujans feel proud to march. The remark applies far beyond politics. In the literary-cultural and social spheres as well, only a person armed with unflinching historical consciousness and the moral courage to refuse every form of personality worship—including worship of oneself—can hope to touch the weak pulse of the age and speak its bitter truths without fear or favour. 

Differences in 2002 and 2025 SIR revision procedures spark alarm in Gujarat

By A Representative   Civil rights groups and electoral reform activists have raised serious concerns over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Gujarat and 11 other states, alleging that the newly enforced requirements could lead to large-scale deletion of legitimate voters, particularly those unable to furnish documentation linking them to the 2002 electoral list.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

From crime to verdict: The 27-year journey that 'rewarded' the destroyers of Babri Masjid

By Shamsul Islam    Thirty-three years ago, on December 6, 1992, a 16th-century mosque was reduced to rubble by a frenzied mob orchestrated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its political fronts. The demolition was not a spontaneous outburst of Hindu sentiment; it was the meticulously planned culmination of a hate campaign that branded Indian Muslims as “Babur-ki-aulad” and the Babri Masjid as a symbol of historical humiliation.