Skip to main content

GoI response undemocratic, tyrannical: PUCL on 'brutal' crackdown on farmers’ march

Counterview Desk 
India's top civil rights group, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), even as condemning the Union government seeking to "wage a war" against the farmers, has said, the latest "brutal crackdown" off Delhi highlights the hypocrisy of the Government of India (GoI). While conferring the country’s highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna, to Charan Singh, a "celebrated" farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister and to Dr MS Swaminathan, agricultural scientist, it "deployed violent measures" to prevent the protesters from exercising their democratic rights.
"The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?", PUCL asked in a statement, underlining, they were only exercising their fundamental right -- demanding "a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers."

Text:

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties strongly condemns the Union Government’s repressive measures against the protesting farmers who are exercising their fundamental rights in demanding a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers.  
We are appalled by the display of brute force by the BJP-led Union Government and the Haryana Government in dealing with the farmers' protests. The measures include:
(1)  Layers of heavy blockades made up of barbed wires, nails, and huge containers set up at the borders to prevent the farmers from entering the NCR region.
(2)  Section 144  enforced in certain parts of Delhi, and Haryana.
(3)  Makeshift prisons set up at various points to prevent the farmers from carrying on their march.
(4)  Internet shutdowns in several districts of Haryana.
What is even more disturbing is the use of:
(a) Rubber bullets
(b) Long Range Acoustic Devices or Sonic Devices capable of causing hearing  impairments; and
(c) Using drone-based tear-gas launchers developed by the Border Security Force (BSF)
The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?
Samyukta Kisan Morcha (Non-political), Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) and the Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee (KMSC) and many other workers unions had called for and set out on the `Dilli Chalo’ march on 13th February 2024, to condemn the Union government’s failure in upholding the promise given in 2021 following the year-long farmers protest. PUCL would like to point out that the farmers protest in 2020-2021 saw thousands of women and men farmers, workers unions and others participating in the protest braving adverse weather conditions which resulted in the death of over 700 farmers. The Modi-government has failed to comply with the public assurances given to the farmers based on which they had called off the struggle in 2021.  
It should be pointed out that the current actions were decided only after talks between farmers unions and government failed, with the farmer’s unions alleging that the government engaged in talks only as a means to delay and avoid implementation of assurances.   
PUCL strongly denounces the undemocratic, tyrannical response of the Union Government to the farmers’ march. Instead of any substantial attempt to engage in good faith dialogue to address the farmers’ grievances, the State has chosen to use force and repression to suppress their voice. In what should be a matter of terrifying concern and shame to every Indian citizen, it has employed tactics normally used against enemies in wartimes, against its own citizens!  
Reports have been coming in about the effect of the violence with around 200 farmers having been left injured by the highhandedness of the police.
Apart from the strong-arm tactics used, several social media accounts of prominent farmer leaders/unions on X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook were withheld ahead of the Delhi March. The Haryana government had also imposed Internet shutdown and a ban on bulk messaging in seven districts. These prohibitory measures, along with sealing off of the Delhi borders, have been challenged in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.  
The brutal crackdown also highlights the hypocrisy of the Union government. In the same week of conferring the country’s highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, to Mr. Charan Singh, a celebrated farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister, and to Dr. MS Swaminathan, an agricultural scientist, the Union government has deployed violent measures to prevent farmers from exercising their democratic rights. The height of irony is that the farmers are demanding the implementation of MS Swaminathan Committee Report, while the government steadfastly refuses to adopt the recommendations which support MSP and other farmer welfare measures.
We wish to point out that instead of recognising the demands of the farmers as a matter of their right to life and livelihood, the state is treating them as criminals and their struggle as a `law and order’ problem to be suppressed.
We believe the actions of the Union Government, Haryana government, and the Delhi Police expose the deep mistrust that the present disposition has against its own citizens, and the functioning of a police-state in the place of democracy.  
Their actions, are in violation of the Article 19(1) (a), (b), and (d), resulting in the trampling of the farmers right to express, assemble peacefully, and move freely between the states of India. These constitutional rights are the heart of any democracy as it is only by the peaceful expression of opinion through public assemblies and marches that change can be brought about. In fact, Babasaheb Ambedkar defined a democracy as ‘a form and a method of government whereby revolutionary changes in the economic and social life of the people are brought about without bloodshed.’ It is this essence, of what makes India a vibrant democracy in the eyes of its founders, that is being shut down before our eyes.
PUCL expresses its solidarity with the protesting farmer unions and organisations, and all the farmers who are asserting their constitutional and fundamental right to expression, movement, and assembly. The protesting farmers are by this very assertion, reclaiming the Indian Constitution for all of us.
-- Kavita Srivastava, President, Dr V Suresh, General Secretary, PUCL

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Ahmedabad's Sabarmati riverfront under scrutiny after Subhash Bridge damage

By Rosamma Thomas*  Large cracks have appeared on Subhash Bridge across the Sabarmati in Ahmedabad, close to the Gandhi Ashram . Built in 1973, this bridge, named after Subhash Chandra Bose , connects the eastern and western parts of the city and is located close to major commercial areas. The four-lane bridge has sidewalks for pedestrians, and is vital for access to Ashram Road , Ellis Bridge , Gandhinagar and the Sabarmati Railway Station .
2 comments
»

Farewell to Robin Smith, England’s Lionhearted Warrior Against Pace

By Harsh Thakor*  Robin Smith, who has died at the age of 62, was among the most adept and convincing players of fast bowling during an era when English cricket was in decline and pace bowling was at its most lethal. Unwavering against the tormenting West Indies pace attack or the relentless Australians, Smith epitomised courage and stroke-making prowess. His trademark shot, an immensely powerful square cut, made him a scourge of opponents. Wearing a blue England helmet without a visor or grille, he relished pulling, hooking and cutting the quicks. 
Post a Comment
»

No action yet on complaint over assault on lawyer during Tirunelveli public hearing

By A Representative   A day after a detailed complaint was filed seeking disciplinary action against ten lawyers in Tirunelveli for allegedly assaulting human rights lawyer Dr. V. Suresh, no action has yet been taken by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, according to the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).
Post a Comment
»

Latur’s quiet rebel: Dr Suryanarayan Ransubhe and his war on Manuvad

By Ravi Ranjan*  In an India still fractured by caste, religion, and language, where narrow loyalties repeatedly threaten to tear the nation apart, Rammanohar Lohia once observed that the true leader of the bahujans is one under whose banner even non-bahujans feel proud to march. The remark applies far beyond politics. In the literary-cultural and social spheres as well, only a person armed with unflinching historical consciousness and the moral courage to refuse every form of personality worship—including worship of oneself—can hope to touch the weak pulse of the age and speak its bitter truths without fear or favour. 
Post a Comment
»

Differences in 2002 and 2025 SIR revision procedures spark alarm in Gujarat

By A Representative   Civil rights groups and electoral reform activists have raised serious concerns over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Gujarat and 11 other states, alleging that the newly enforced requirements could lead to large-scale deletion of legitimate voters, particularly those unable to furnish documentation linking them to the 2002 electoral list.
Post a Comment
»

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.
Post a Comment
»

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...
Post a Comment
»

From crime to verdict: The 27-year journey that 'rewarded' the destroyers of Babri Masjid

By Shamsul Islam    Thirty-three years ago, on December 6, 1992, a 16th-century mosque was reduced to rubble by a frenzied mob orchestrated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its political fronts. The demolition was not a spontaneous outburst of Hindu sentiment; it was the meticulously planned culmination of a hate campaign that branded Indian Muslims as “Babur-ki-aulad” and the Babri Masjid as a symbol of historical humiliation. 
Post a Comment
»