Skip to main content

GoI response undemocratic, tyrannical: PUCL on 'brutal' crackdown on farmers’ march

Counterview Desk 

India's top civil rights group, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), even as condemning the Union government seeking to "wage a war" against the farmers, has said, the latest "brutal crackdown" off Delhi highlights the hypocrisy of the Government of India (GoI). While conferring the country’s highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna, to Charan Singh, a "celebrated" farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister and to Dr MS Swaminathan, agricultural scientist, it "deployed violent measures" to prevent the protesters from exercising their democratic rights.
"The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?", PUCL asked in a statement, underlining, they were only exercising their fundamental right -- demanding "a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers."

Text:

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties strongly condemns the Union Government’s repressive measures against the protesting farmers who are exercising their fundamental rights in demanding a legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP), full waiver of farmers’ debts, pensions to farmers, and withdrawal of cases filed in 2020-21 against the protesting farmers.  
We are appalled by the display of brute force by the BJP-led Union Government and the Haryana Government in dealing with the farmers' protests. The measures include:
(1)  Layers of heavy blockades made up of barbed wires, nails, and huge containers set up at the borders to prevent the farmers from entering the NCR region.
(2)  Section 144  enforced in certain parts of Delhi, and Haryana.
(3)  Makeshift prisons set up at various points to prevent the farmers from carrying on their march.
(4)  Internet shutdowns in several districts of Haryana.
What is even more disturbing is the use of:
(a) Rubber bullets
(b) Long Range Acoustic Devices or Sonic Devices capable of causing hearing  impairments; and
(c) Using drone-based tear-gas launchers developed by the Border Security Force (BSF)
The tactics adopted by the Union and State Governments raises a fundamental question: does the Union Government consider the protesting farmers as citizens of India or as enemy aliens?
Samyukta Kisan Morcha (Non-political), Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) and the Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee (KMSC) and many other workers unions had called for and set out on the `Dilli Chalo’ march on 13th February 2024, to condemn the Union government’s failure in upholding the promise given in 2021 following the year-long farmers protest. PUCL would like to point out that the farmers protest in 2020-2021 saw thousands of women and men farmers, workers unions and others participating in the protest braving adverse weather conditions which resulted in the death of over 700 farmers. The Modi-government has failed to comply with the public assurances given to the farmers based on which they had called off the struggle in 2021.  
It should be pointed out that the current actions were decided only after talks between farmers unions and government failed, with the farmer’s unions alleging that the government engaged in talks only as a means to delay and avoid implementation of assurances.   
PUCL strongly denounces the undemocratic, tyrannical response of the Union Government to the farmers’ march. Instead of any substantial attempt to engage in good faith dialogue to address the farmers’ grievances, the State has chosen to use force and repression to suppress their voice. In what should be a matter of terrifying concern and shame to every Indian citizen, it has employed tactics normally used against enemies in wartimes, against its own citizens!  
Reports have been coming in about the effect of the violence with around 200 farmers having been left injured by the highhandedness of the police.
Apart from the strong-arm tactics used, several social media accounts of prominent farmer leaders/unions on X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook were withheld ahead of the Delhi March. The Haryana government had also imposed Internet shutdown and a ban on bulk messaging in seven districts. These prohibitory measures, along with sealing off of the Delhi borders, have been challenged in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.  
The brutal crackdown also highlights the hypocrisy of the Union government. In the same week of conferring the country’s highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, to Mr. Charan Singh, a celebrated farmers’ leader and former Prime Minister, and to Dr. MS Swaminathan, an agricultural scientist, the Union government has deployed violent measures to prevent farmers from exercising their democratic rights. The height of irony is that the farmers are demanding the implementation of MS Swaminathan Committee Report, while the government steadfastly refuses to adopt the recommendations which support MSP and other farmer welfare measures.
We wish to point out that instead of recognising the demands of the farmers as a matter of their right to life and livelihood, the state is treating them as criminals and their struggle as a `law and order’ problem to be suppressed.
We believe the actions of the Union Government, Haryana government, and the Delhi Police expose the deep mistrust that the present disposition has against its own citizens, and the functioning of a police-state in the place of democracy.  
Their actions, are in violation of the Article 19(1) (a), (b), and (d), resulting in the trampling of the farmers right to express, assemble peacefully, and move freely between the states of India. These constitutional rights are the heart of any democracy as it is only by the peaceful expression of opinion through public assemblies and marches that change can be brought about. In fact, Babasaheb Ambedkar defined a democracy as ‘a form and a method of government whereby revolutionary changes in the economic and social life of the people are brought about without bloodshed.’ It is this essence, of what makes India a vibrant democracy in the eyes of its founders, that is being shut down before our eyes.
PUCL expresses its solidarity with the protesting farmer unions and organisations, and all the farmers who are asserting their constitutional and fundamental right to expression, movement, and assembly. The protesting farmers are by this very assertion, reclaiming the Indian Constitution for all of us.
-- Kavita Srivastava, President, Dr V Suresh, General Secretary, PUCL

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital.