Skip to main content

As international food aid dwindles, many Rohingyas get involved in criminal activities

By Fumiko Yamada* 
In a surprise move, the World Food Programme (WFP) of the United Nations has reduced the amount of food aid to the Rohingya due to lack of funds. Nearly six years into the Rohingya crisis, life-saving aid to Rohingyas in Cox's Bazar has been cut. From March 1, the amount of assistance for each Rohingya was reduced from $12 to $10.
The attention of the international community towards Myanmar's Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh is decreasing. The response from various countries and donor agencies at the beginning of the crisis has steadily declined over the past few years.
Officials of various international organizations and NGOs believe that since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war, there are indications that this aid will decrease further. Because, the attention of western countries is now focused on that. Some non-governmental organizations have started cutting back on various programmes due to lack of funding.
Foreign aid for the Rohingya is coordinated by the Joint Response Plan or JRP.
According to them, in 2022, the United Nations Refugee Agency or UNHCR asked for 881 million dollars in aid, but only 285 million dollars came until August. Finally, the total amount of money received last year is still being calculated.
Since August 2017, millions of Rohingyas started to seek shelter in Bangladesh to save their lives. Despite repeated attempts, the Bangladesh government could not repatriate them to Myanmar.
About 938,000 Rohingyas are living in the camps of Cox's Bazar, including Bhasanchar, in the camps of the United Nations Refugee Agency, in about 200,000 families. Although the total number of Rohingyas in Bangladesh is more than 12 million.
The United Nations Refugee Agency, the United Nations Migration Agency and the World Food Programme have been supporting the Rohingyas in the camps with food, clothing, shelter, fuel and medical care. And UNICEF takes care of education.
They mainly spend money through various organizations working with Rohingyas. According to the Bangladesh government, about 150 organizations have been working with humanitarian aid to the Rohingyas.
However, recently after the start of the war in Ukraine, some organizations have taken the initiative to reduce some of their programmes due to lack of sufficient funds.
Officials at the Office of the Commissioner for Refugee Relief and Repatriation, the government agency managing Rohingya refugees, also said that international aid has not been coming in as expected for the past few years, and is now coming even less.
The Rohingyas say they are worried about the gradual reduction in food aid. The Rohingyas demanded international pressure to repatriate Myanmar quickly.

Rohingyas living in camps

Rohingya Asma of Ukhia Camp-4 said that earlier I could buy 5 kg of sugar and 5 kg of pulses. Now the money is reduced, I can't even buy pepper. Then now the rice has to be borrowed from someone else.
Rafiq, another Rohingya, said, "Before March, I used to get food assistance for Tk 1,220. But now I am getting food assistance of 1000 20 rupees. If food aid is reduced in this way, we will suffer greatly. Because even before this, we had to go through some kind of difficulty.
Another Rohingya named Siraj said that earlier people from different countries including people from Bangladesh used to come and help. I was able to eat and drink well then. But since 2018, food aid has started to decline and is no longer increasing. In particular, food aid is further reduced in 2023.
938,000 Rohingyas live in Cox's Bazar, including Bhasanchar camps set up by the United Nations Refugee Agency
Local residents are always afraid of Rohingyas. Local public representatives also fear that the reduction of food aid will increase the crime rate among the Rohingyas.
When the amount of consumption of Rohingya is decreasing, they will want to fix their source of income by engaging in various types of crimes. I think it will have more impact on the local residents.
After the destruction of forests and mountains, wild elephants attacked the locality due to food shortage. Likewise, as food aid to the Rohingyas dwindles, they are likely to attack the locals within a short period of time.

Demand for repatriation

Chairman of Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights Mohammad Jobair said, "Rohingyas are not people without a country. The Myanmar army forced us out of the country. Therefore, we demand that Myanmar be repatriated to our homeland quickly by applying international pressure.
And refugee relief and repatriation commissioner. Mizanur Rahman said, if the allocation is reduced at this stage, the Rohingyas will become more desperate to find work. It will make it more difficult to keep them inside the camp. However, the government is trying to repatriate the Rohingyas to their homeland. The government is working to ensure that the Rohingyas can live with dignity until repatriation.
How much is being sought, and how much help is coming?  According to the Inter-Sector Coordination Group (ISCG), a coordinating organization for humanitarian assistance in the Rohingya camps, the international community's financial assistance has been continuously decreasing since 2019.
In 2019, USD 920 million was sought and USD 692 million was received. In 2020, $1058 million was asked for and $684 million was received. In 2021, 943 million US dollars were requested and 677 million US dollars were received. And in 2022, only 553 million US dollars were received from 881 million US dollars.
Since the beginning of this year, some non-governmental organizations have informed their employees about the suspension of some humanitarian programs. Basically, such indications were available since the beginning of the Ukraine war. Donor funds are not available for some projects. Because of this, some programs are being closed, say those concerned.
It should be noted that more than 700,000 Rohingya took shelter in Cox's Bazar in a few months after the torture by the Myanmar army on August 25, 2017. Earlier there were several lakhs of Rohingyas in Bangladesh. Currently, more than 1.2 million Rohingya are living in Ukhia and Teknaf camps in Cox's Bazar.
---
*Graduate of South Asian Studies, University of Toronto, Canada

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Big promises, limited delivery? Rekha Gupta's first year as Delhi CM

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  Delhi has witnessed women at the helm before, each leaving behind a distinct political and administrative imprint on the national capital. From diplomacy to development, the city's past female chief ministers shaped governance in their own ways. As Rekha Gupta completes one year in office, the question arises: has her tenure lived up to her ambitious promises? After her first year, Gupta appears to have made tall claims but delivered little since taking the oath of office. Despite coming from a background in student politics, her report card as Delhi chief minister is far from impressive. She seems to understand the nuances of politics, yet she is often seen generating considerable buzz without substantial delivery on the ground.