Skip to main content

Sovereignty: Ignoring anti-colonial concept, celebrities 'support' corporate view

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The question of national sovereignty is dominating debates in Indian politics today. The Modi government and a section of the Indian media have been deriding anyone as anti-national – whether students, youths, religious minorities, Dalits, tribals, Kashmiris, human rights activists, lawyers, rationalists, writers, journalists, comedians, cartoonists, progressive activists or farmers – if they questions the government of the day.
Indeed, the poor oppressed and the marginalised, fighting for justice, appear to be considered a threat to the sovereignty of the country. This is happening even as people appear to remain oblivious of this game. They seem to have long been insulated by the power of money, name, fame, constructed public image, and celebrity status, blessed by the government and the corporates.
Lumpen celebrities have forgotten their social commitments for the people who adore, celebrate, emulate and idealise them in their everyday life. Easy prey to deceptive forces, they live in an ideology-free zone called ‘opportunism’. They do not realise that Indian farmers are fighting the farmer laws which threaten their source of livelihood, or that Kashmiris have lived far too long an open prison, or that the tribals are facing the onslaught of mining-led industrialisation and corporate loot of their natural resources.
Nor do they realise that journalists are facing annihilating threat to their live for reporting truth, or students, writers, lawyers and human rights activists are languishing in prison cells. Indeed, they are oblivious of the fact that hunger, homelessness, unemployment and poverty are being accelerated by government policies, which defend of corporates.
This is happening at a time when realisation is dwelling among large sections of people that the Modi government is not serving their interests. This is crystalised by none other than in the farmers’ movement, continuing for the last three months. The farmers have begun to see how the BJP government is taking authoritarian steps to suppress the democratic voices of dissent with ruthless actions.
The fact is, corporate sovereignty and bonded citizenship are unsustainable. The Modi government’s policies are pitting farmers against army, Hindus against Muslims, north India versus south India and higher caste against lower caste. They are based on Hindutva politics, which seeks to undermine citizenship rights and democratic institutions.
Yet, majority of Indian celebrities are either silent, living in fear or defending the pro-corporate government, which is the source of their advertisement or tax rebate revenue. The farmers’ movement has attracted global attentions. Not without reason, many international voices have expressed their solidarity with Indian farmers and their right to defend their livelihoods.
Yet, the Modi government is hell-bent on implementing the anti-farmer laws which are concomitant with corporate interests, even though its failures have contributed to create conditions of enormous political, social, cultural, religious, economic and institutional crises. It is hiding behind by creating a propaganda war in the name of protecting the unity, integrity and sovereignty of India.
A Hindutva protest 
From Indian cricketers, film stars, celebrities to media persons and corporate heads have started echoing the Modi government’s propaganda, as if India and its sovereignty is under threat after international celebrities and public figures tweeted in support of the farmers’ struggle. This way, the Hindutva forces are manufacturing the crisis of Indian sovereignty.
Farmers’ struggle has exposed limits of Westphalian sovereignty that has helped mobility of capital, territorialisation of labour
The Indian farmers’ struggle has exposed the limits of Westphalian sovereignty that helps consolidate the mobility of capital and territorialisation of labour. The ruling classes and their celebrity representatives call it as ‘our internal affair’. The Westphalian concept of national sovereignty is a bourgeois project, whereas the postcolonial national sovereignty is a product of mass movements.
The sovereignty of India is the product of the country’s anti-colonial struggle from all regional and religious backgrounds. It has helped shape India’s constitutional sovereignty, democracy, egalitarian and secular ideals of modern India. The sovereignty of India is a product of collective sacrifice and collective consensus to build a country for its people.
The people of India are the true shareholders and guardians of Indian sovereignty. The collective foundations of sovereignty, unity and integrity of India is shaped by its people and their citizenship rights are guaranteed under the Constitution of India. The unity, integrity and sovereignty of India depends on the common will of the people.
Hindutva forces are opposed to the ideal of India based on integral humanism, which reverberates in the concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world is one family). They seek to weaken Indian democracy by destroying the universal, egalitarian and secular nature of citizenship rights.
The unity, integrity and sovereignty of India depends on greater democracy, stronger and inalienable citizenship rights. The farmers’ movement seeks to reclaim democracy and citizenship rights to ensure unity, integrity and sovereignty of India. It can be called a national liberation struggle to uphold the inclusive legacy of the India freedom struggle. There is no space for territorial theology of sovereignty in it.
The collective emancipatory ideals have always brought people together from all backgrounds to fight unitedly against all forms of exploitation, inequalities and domination. Indeed, the struggle for human emancipation and justice and the ideals of solidarities are borderless. This is how human history has progressed from feudalism to democracy.
The successful struggles against slavery, feudalism, colonialism, apartheid, fascism and dictatorships are products of this interconnectedness of human beings, and their collective commitment to uphold common values of humanism beyond narrow selfishness or immediate identity based on nationality, religion, race and class.
Without doubt, the farmers’ movement in India represents the best traditions of united fight for justice. It has reinvigorated the progressive ideals of solidarity and internationalism.
---
*University of Glasgow, UK

Comments

Anonymous said…
Cricketers want assignments for their children - actors are possibly not comfortable with raids by various government bodies. The greatest of course is the candaian citizen actor. No problem if he decides to comment. But when other foreigners comment there is a problem. After all india is the worlds largest democracy comprised of all the rich folk mentioned in this article

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”