Skip to main content

'Andolanjeevi' vs 'hum do hamare do': Will non-BJP leaders work for secular alliance?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

Oratory is an important instrument in today’s times. Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave a new term, 'andolanjeevi', to his supporters which was countered by activists vehemently. Modi's speech was nothing but addressed to his audience, and now that includes the corporate bosses too, as he categorically said that private players are important for 'nation building'.
The second most important speech which was highly impressive. It exposed the Sangh Parivar agenda and governance of the last six years. Delivered by Mahua Moitra, Tranamool Congress member of Parliament in Lok Sabha, this extraordinary speech, full of passion, with each word coming from the heart, has rattled the ruling party.
The issue of farmers was strongly raised by Harsimaran Kaur, who was a minister a couple of months back, but is now opposing the government tooth and nail. She exposed BJP's double speak, pointing outhow the party has treated its allies. The Akali Dal was the oldest ally of BJP. Both parted company following the farm bills. Ironically, the Prime Minister 'complimented' women MPs for working hard to take the government to task.
But the most interesting speech in Parliament was that of Rahul Gandhi. His 'hum do hamare do’ slogan has distressed the ruling party. Rahul's speech in Parliament showed that, with experience, he is shining. It is good that he has been persistent in his approach over the last six seven years. 
Unlike other top leaders who enjoyed ministerial positions during the UPA rule, Rahul threw his weight behind social justice, secularism and socialism. If Congress had stood ideologically strong on Hindutva ranting, it would not have been in such a huge decline.
It is extraordinary that Rahul used his time allocated for the budget discussion on the farmers’ issue and explained the three farm bills in the simplest way. Farmers in India have understood that he stands by them and people all over the country will soon see how 'hum do hamare do' will become a powerful slogan to explain the method of functioning of the current regime.
The most important part of Rahul’s speech was his request for two minutes’ silence for farmers who have died during the ongoing protest – the 'shaheed kisans'. This jolted those who did not speak a even one word for kisans and did not want to discuss the issue at all.
How insensitive can the regime be: It has been looking for conspiracy theories and has let loose its cyber goons to spread lies and calumny. Rahul's symbolic gesture will have a longtime impact and people will realise that there are ways and means to convey the message even when the party in power appeared determined not to allow him to speak on the issue.
While Congress is shaping up its ideology, its main problem is, it still does not have organisations in states. We don’t know what it is doing in West Bengal. Rahul has so far not visited Odisha. While Priyanka Gandhi has been active in Uttar Pradesh, albeit part time, there are many states where the party is not involved in any political action. It is important that ideological clarity of the party is complimented by the strong organisational network and alliances on the ground.
Meanwhile, as BJP goes whole hog in its effort to dislodge Mamata Banerjee, it was great to see Mamata respond to “India Today” anchor Rahul Kanwal, who tried to give him a lecture on freedom of expression and duties of media. She asked why Rajdeep Sardesai was taken off the air by the India Today group. When Rahul Kanwal 'reminded' her that Rajdeep was very much a part of the India Today group, she asked him back: Why was he not visible.
As BJP goes whole hog in its effort to dislodge Mamata Banerjee, it was great to see Mamata respond to the India Today anchor
Currently, most “bania” channels are now organising its 'conclaves' in Kolkata. Basically, they are helping BJP build a positive atmosphere. Under the 'pretext' of conclaves, these channels give extraordinary space to BJP leaders to cry hoarse against other parties in the fray. They give one to one interviews. A particular kind of 'narrative' is being spread through 'experts', who are none other than members of one or the other BJP-supported coterie.
I don’t like Mamata's politics, but I must admit she is a street fighter and knows well how to counter the Modi-Shah duo. She has already raised the pitch by highlighting the 'outsider-insider' notion, which has made BJP uncomfortable. Rahul Kanwal asked Mamata as to why she was using this phrase. Her reply was, she has not spoken against anyone.
People from UP, Bihar, Rajasthan, Punjab, Gujarat, Jharkhand, South India have been living in Bengal and they are more Bengalis than Bengalis, she said, adding, all of them are happy. She insisted, UP should be run by UP wallah, Gujarat by people in Gujarat, and Punjab by Punjabis.
One cannot impose things from Delhi using Enforcement Directorate, CBI and other agencies to push BJP’s agenda, Mamata further said. She did not stop her. Her next line exposed the current regime. "If you love India and the idea of India then why are you appointing officials from one state in important positions?”, she queried.
Indeed, the government is least eligible to give a sermon on diversity, as it has never cared for it. It has been blatantly following favouritism. Officers from Gujarat are being given special positions at the PMO as well as the Central government. Are there no officers who can be trusted or capable of holding important positions?
As one can see, Mamata is fighting tooth and nail, and she knows her facts well. Mahua Moitra, too, has spoken with passion and conviction. At the same time, Rahul Gandhi's speech confirms that, when one speaks with ideological honesty, one would be able to fight much better. Modi and Shah speak powerfully because they are committed to their ideology and their constituency. The problem is with the “seculars” who are not committed to secularism or social justice.
Things appear to be changing now. Leaders seem to have realised that there is no other way but to stick to conviction and dedication to social justice, secularism and socialism to counter the casteist “varnadharmi” capitalists, the Sethji-Bhatji combine, to quote Jyotiba Phule.
It is time political leaders build an alliance at the ground level. There is no time for 'experiment'. The only thing they need to do is to build organisation. Indeed, there is a need to introspect honestly and make alliances which have ideological strength of Ambedkar-Phule-Periiyar-Birsa Munda-Bhagat Singh'. Such an alliance can engage in some give and take. It may not be permanent but it should have ideological strength.
Good days are returning as “netas” are working harder to make their strong points, whether in Parliament or outside. May their tribe increase.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

Anonymous said…
This idea is a pipe dream . The Gandhis cannot partner with anyone. Despite them being bankrupt of any talent required for leadership they cling on to the party. Every time Rahul opens his mouth most surely the BJP gains in the relevant elections of the time and / or gains supporters. Every time Rahul opens his mouth chants of "pappu" reverberate. How can this man and his party ever join with others seriously for any kind of alliance. The idea is a pipe dream. He is tainted and has to retire form politics for a minimum of 5 if not 10 years

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs.