Skip to main content

Kashmiri diaspora group sheds equidistance, ignores atrocities in Pak-occupied territory

By A Representative 
Clear indications have emerged that the powerful Kashmiri diaspora organisation, Washington-based World Kashmir Awareness Forum, has shed its earlier approach of equidistance from both India and Pakistan while demanding what it calls the inalienable Kashmiri right of self-determination. The statement has been made in order to exhort the Kashmiri diaspora to stand united for demand the “inalienable” right.
While it is not known what has brought in such a change, a statement forwarded by its president Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai, “Role and Responsibility of Global Kashmiri Diaspora”, even as calling Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) a “disputed territory” and calling upon both the countries to help resolve the “long stand conflict to the satisfaction of all parties concerned”, has sought to recall “atrocities” on the Indian side of Kashmir”, but is singularly quiet about human rights violations in the Pak-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
The diaspora statement comes despite the fact that a Washington DC-based thinktank, Freedom House, in a report released about a year ago had placed both the Indian part of Kashmir and PoK as equal – “not free”. In fact, in its ranking, the report gave J&K as well as PoK gave the same score, 28 on a scale of 100, and categorizing both as “Not Free”, even as rating 210 countries, including individual territories, while analysing two sub-categories, political rights and civil liberties.
The 79-year-old organization Washington DC organisation had found in its report that, while the PoK’s category as “Not Free” had not changed from what it was in 2019, remaining static at 28/100, as for J&K, its category has changed from “Partly Free” to “Not Free”, and the rating dropped by a whopping 21 points, from 49/100 to 28/100.
Interestingly, in September 2020, in an article, Dr Fai had sharply criticised Pak move to to elevate Gilgat-Baltistan (GB) to a full-fledged province with all constitutional rights, “disturbing the disputed nature of the state of the Jammu & Kashmir”, and calling it “akin to the unilateral action taken by Narendra Modi on August 5, 2019, when Articles 370 and 35A were abrogated.” He said, “Both these actions will be in violation of the United Nations Security Council resolutions # 91 of 1951 and 122 and 126 of 1957.”
A pro-independence protest in Pak-occupied Kashmir
Thus, the diaspora group, while recalling how “100,000 Kashmiris have lost their lives in the past 30 years. 8,000 to 10,000 people have disappeared” and talks of “2,700 mass graves” having been discovered in the town of Kupwara alone, he refuses to recall atrocities, if any, committed in PoK.
The United Nations in a 2019 report had said how Pak authorities had suppressed “rights to freedoms of expression and opinion, assembly and association” on every section of PoK’s population. In its report “Update of the Situation of Human Rights in Indian-Administered Kashmir and Pakistan-Administered Kashmir from May 2018 to April 2019”, the UN said, this is being done directly under the nose of the Pakistani Prime Minister, who is “vested with wide-ranging powers, including the authority to appoint and dismiss judges of the superior courts and to appoint the Chief Election Commissioner” in PoK.
Interestingly, a report by the diaspora group on February 7, 2021 on a webinar “Violations of Human Rights in Kashmir and the Role of Media”, organized by the Human Rights Department of Punjab University, Lahore, had also talked about “abrogation of Article 370 and 35 A” leading to the alleged annexation of Kashmir into India. But it kept mum about human rights violations in PoK.
The diaspora group leader Dr Fai did not respond to a query by Counterview on why there was no mention of atrocities in PoK, even though the seminar was organised in Pakistan.

Comments

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs.