Skip to main content

Luring neighbours to 'encircle' India, China may be biting more than it can chew

By NS Venkataraman*
It is clear by now that China has not concealed its aim and determination to dominate the world as a superpower and expand its territories. In fact, China has begun to give the impression that it would combine different types of strategies on the trade front, propaganda campaign and military strategy to achieve its objectives, depending upon circumstances.
Indeed, many countries in the world appear to be concerned about China’s methodologies, practices and goals. After all, any attempt to dominate the world or expand its territory is bound to negatively impact the interests of the affected countries. Yet, China seems confident that it can afford to ignore the concern of other countries, as it moves on with its plans to achieve its objectives.
These strategies of China are largely similar to past regimes that have adopted such methods in different measures, though history has shown that such ill-conceived and unethical plans do not always provide the intended end results in the long run, and the initiator of the schemes suffers and falls out in the process.
China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) scheme is part of its grand plan to make the economically weak and developing countries to firmly fall under its control. As India has refused to enter the OBOR trap, China considers India as a stumbling block and thinks that India should be weakened in all possible ways.
As part of its scheme to weaken India, and also as part of its global domination plans, China is trying to encircle India by bringing all of India’s neighbours – Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, even Maldives – under its thumb. It is adopting a combination of methods for this purpose.
There are reports that China is bribing political leaders in these countries in a variety of ways while participating in infrastructure projects. It is enabling such projects to be implemented by extending financial assistance, equipment and technicians to these countries, and in the process making these countries debt-ridden and dependent on China.
India’s neighbours are burdened with debt that they owe to China, which they may not be able to repay in the foreseeable future
However, China appears to have ignored the ground realities, that while it can buy the politicians and sectarian groups in its neighbours, including India, making the economy and territory of these countries vulnerable to influence and coercion, it is not easy to overpower their people. Overpowering the territories is different from overpowering the people living in these territories.
Protests have already begun, though not loud enough, in Pakistan and Sri Lanka against handing over of such projects to China. Reports point to how in Pakistan the military is now protecting Chinese technicians working following apprehensions that government has virtually handed over Gwadar port and several important mines to China. Protests have also begun in Sri Lanka, where the government has virtually handed over the Hambantota port to China. There is expectation that these protest would intensify as people realize the extent of dependence on China.
Meanwhile, India’s neighbours are burdened with debt that they owe to China, which they may not be able to repay in the foreseeable future. Several other Asian and African countries are also facing a similar predicament. In the course of time, these countries may fail to repay debt, or may even refuse to honour debt, terming the terms of debt unreasonable or exploitative.
One wonders if China will be able to handle such a situation. Public anger may become more and more visible. If China tries to enforce the terms of debt agreement, it would tense relations with these countries. Beijing can ruthlessly suppress protests by people within China, it cannot do the same in other countries.
Is China biting more than what it can chew?
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.