Skip to main content

Digital education? About 80% children may find themselves 'excluded', webinar told

Dr Manish Jain at the webinar
By A Representative
A webinar organized by the Right to Education (RTE) Forum on "Quality education through digital learning: Grassroots reality" has been told that nearly 80 per cent of children are at the risk of being excluded from as a result of the excessive stress on digital learning.
Stating this, national convenor, Right to Education (RTE) Forum, Ambarish Rai, said, "Digital education cannot be an option of school. The school gives us a sense of sociality and reduces the feeling of non-equality and high-pitchedness.”
Dr Manish Jain, who is with the Department of Educational Studies, Ambedkar University, Delhi, said, "Reports coming from many sources across the country show how annoying online learning courses and sessions are proving for both children and parents. Even in metros like Delhi and Mumbai, barely 50 percent children are able to connect with digital platforms.”
Prof Poonam Batra of the Central Institute of Education, University of Delhi, said, digital education has been accepted as an option, which is not a good sign, raising doubts whether it would fulfill the goal of universalisation of education. Dr Batra called it a neoliberal ploy to increasingly influence the dominant view of education.
Smriti Sharma, assistant professor, department of elementary education, Lady Shri Ram College, wondered where would deprived communities find themselves in digital education. Calling education “an important factor of social change”, she said, “Excessive emphasis on digital education will push the already marginalized people out of the realm of education.”
The webinar was attended by around 325 participants from across the country.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.