No tribal representation in order forming committees for eco-sensitive zone in South Gujarat, 30,000 protest

South Gujarat tribals against Central order

By A Representative
In a major development, the Government of India’s proposed notification, calling for declaring the seven kiloemtre area around South Gujarat’s one of the most well-preserved Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary as eco-sensitive has zone, has ignored participation of local tribal representatives in the proposed master plan to “develop” the region.
The sanctuary is situated off the controversial Narmada dam, and houses some 121 tribal villages.
While the notification wants the master plan to be implemented for developing eco-tourism activities and “non-polluting” small scale industries the eco-sensitive zone, it is widely believed, the sanctuary is the next target for extension of tourism activities off Narmada dam around the 182-metre tall statue of the Sardar Patel under construction in the midst of Narmada river.
The notification says, the master plan would be declared after ”consultation with all the concerned departments”, such as environment, forests, urban development, tourism, municipality, revenue, agriculture, Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), irrigation and public works department of the Gujarat government.
Published in Hindi and English – with no Gujarati copy made available – the notification, dated July 30, given to the tribal villages last week, also talks of having a seven-person monitoring committee for ensuring proper implementation of the master plan. However, here also, it ignores any representative from the tribal dominated area’s 121 tribal villages, which it seeks to identify as part of eco-sensitive zone.
The seven-person monitoring committee would be largely official, or with two “independent” members chosen by the government. There is, however, no mention of giving representation to elected members from the tribal region, let alone representatives of the villages which would form part of the eco-sensitive zone.

Veteran tribal leader Chhotubhai Vasava with others on the rostrum

The committee would iclude the district collector, Narmada; a senior town planner of the area; the regional officer of the GPCB; a representative of the department of forests and environment, Gujarat government; and the deputy conservator of forests, in charge of Shoolpaneshwar Sanctuary, Narmada district.
Then there would be two “independent” members – a non-government organization representative, who would be chosen by the government; and an expert in the area ecology and environment, again chosen by the Gujarat government – and both would be chosen for a period of one year.
With notification in hand, there is a further flareup of tribals of South Gujarat, who say the notification is an “infringement” of their rights. Two well-established organizations, Adivasi Mahasabha and Adivasi Ekta Parishad, held out one the biggest rallies at Dediapada town, off Shoolpaneshwar on September 21, against the proposal for eco-sensitive zone.
Speaking at the 30,000-strong rally, which took place following a 6,000-strong rally a few days back, veteran tribal leader Chhotubhai Vasava said, declaring the area as eco-sensitive zone is “the first step” towards evicting the tribals from the region.
According to him, there is “no talk about tribals’ forest rights, as stipulated in the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, nor is there any talk about community rights of the forests, in the notification.”
“There has not been any consultation with the gram sabhas either, as required by the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996, a law enacted by the Government of India to cover the scheduled areas to ensure consultation of the tribals before triggering any developmental project”, he pointed out.

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava* Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.

Search This Blog