Skip to main content

Congress belies apprehensions, asks Gujarat governor not to sign "pro-corporate" land acquisition Bill

Bharatsinh Solanki
By A Representative
One day after Gujarat's upcoming farmers' organization, Jameen Adhikar Andolan Gujarat (JAAG), accused the Congress of adopting a lackadaisical attitude towards new land laws being brought by the state BJP rulers for favouring industrialists, the state Congress leadership has asked the Gujarat Governor not to sign the controversial Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling (Amendment) Bill, 2015, calling it anti-weaker sections.
Signed by three senior leaders, state Congress chief Bharatsinh Solanki, Leader of Opposition in the assembly Shankarsinh Vaghela, and ex-Leader of Opposition Arjun Modhwadia, a memorandum submitted to the governor said the bill was passed with majority vote after suspending the entire opposition from the assembly on August 28, 2015.
Giving a detailed explanation on the implications of the amendment – which JAAG failed to do – the memorandum said, the Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act was enacted in 1960 with the aim of acquiring surplus agricultural land from landlords, allotting it to agricultural cooperative societies, especially those that were formed with members of weaker sections of society, especially landless labourers and farmers with small land holdings.
Suggesting that with the new amendment the surplus land is sought to be handed over to the industrialists at a very cheap rate, as it was found not being used, the memorandum said, “The main purpose of this Act was to allot surplus such land to the needy people like cattle breeder, landless persons, farm labourers and small land holders, and forming their cooperative societies.”
Pointing out that taking advantage of a recent judgment of Supreme Court judgment, the government “received” all this land, which had been lying idle and which was already a wasteland, being utilized for grazing purposes, the memorandum said, it would have been better had the land been “given to landless persons, farm laborers and farmers' families with small land holding in Gujarat.”
Accused the BJP rulers of eying this land “with corrupt and greedy intention”, the memorandum said, it was with this intention that the amendment to the 1960 Act was brought in. By bringing the amendment, the government has decided to hand over “land to industrialists and the rich, instead of the eligible needy classes”, it said.
The memorandum explains, the amendment asserts the following words – "or for the allotment for industrial purpose or for the development thereof or for any public purpose" – after the wordings "for ensuing the full and efficient use” of land. It comments, “With this amendment, the concept behind the provisions made in original Act, has been changed.”
The memorandum says, “This amendment reflects the changed mentality of the government. The earlier governments were for emancipation of weaker-backward classes of society. However, the present government wants to make industrialists and rich richer. It will no more mandatory for the government to allot the land acquired from farmers under the Land Ceiling Act to the landless.”
It adds, “It can now allot it to big industrialists and rich people to enhance industrial facilities in the name of development. Thus, the land acquired through the Act made for abolishing big landlords will be used to create new industrialists' and builders' landlords.”
Citing the clauses which have been changes, the memorandum says, the amendment also allows any urban local body to acquire land for public purpose if the land is situated within the areas of such local body. By adding this provision, it can convert any land for urban development without any hurdle, the memorandum says, pointing out, even here it clear that the land will not be allocated to the landless.
There is a scope created for big manipulation with this amendment, the memorandum says, adding, with this amendment it will no more be necessary for industrialists to pay premium for converting land from new tenure (land acquired under land reforms) to old tenure (having the the provision of pre-land reforms period).
“New tenure land is converted to old tenure land only after the payment of premium prescribed by the government. Instead of that, builders-industrialists would be able to be able to acquire new tenure land worth crores without paying any premium”, the memorandum says.

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.