Three top Modi ministers had "virtually no role to play" in the decision to raise Narmada dam height: NBA

By A Representative
Top social activist, Narmada Bachao Andolan’s Medha Patkar, fighting against the Narmada dam for decades, has alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi “influenced” the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) “politically” to raise the Narmada dam’s height. She said, she was “shocked” that the decision of the NCA, the multi-state body authorized for all the decisions on the Narmada project, was taken “bypassing the three concerned Union ministers -- Uma Bharti (water resources), Thavaar Chand Gehlot (social justice and empowerment) and Prakash Javdekar (environment), all from Madhya Pradesh.”
Pointing out that these leaders “had virtually no role in decision making”, the NBA leader suggested to newspersons in Delhi, this became clear during their meeting of NBA representatives. “Uma Bharti directed NCA officials look into some of the issues pointed out by the NBA and review all the decisions in a participatory manner. Gehlot was wrongly briefed by officials that the recent decision was in compliance with the Supreme Court judgment, while the reality is diametrically opposite”, an NBA statement said.

Uma Bharati

The NBA’s two-day “chetavni dharna” came to an end at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi saw prominent leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the CPI-M, prominent lawyers, intellectuals and activists participating. “All of them warned the Prime Minister and the NDA government to undertake a serious review of the illegal decision to raise the height of the dam”, the NBA said, adding, the cost of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), of whose the dam was the most important component, has already been estimated at Rs 90,000 crore, even as submerging of 2.5 lakh people in the valley.
“In the name of Kutch and Saurashtra, Gujarat plans to dole out lakhs of hectares of command area land and water to the corporates and industries”, the statement said, adding, “A team of members of Parliament and distinguished citizens would visit the valley very soon, mostly before the beginning of the monsoon session, to raise the issues both within the country and also at every national fora.”
Talking with media, Yogendra Yadav of AAP condemned the “fast-track clearance approach of the Modi government in all matters and attempt to quell the voice of people's movements, which are actually trying to raise real people's issues in the country and challenge undemocratic decisions, as also loot of exchequer by massive corruption and corporate pandering”.

Javadekar

Yadav pointed out that the decision on the dam “indicative of the approach of Modi, which he would like to continue for five years. This means decisions would be towards destroying environment, suppressing the legitimate rights and voices of people.” He said the decision to raise the dam has been taken against the backdrop of Rs 1,000 crore judicial inquiry into resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) corruption in Madhya Pradesh.
National Campaign for People's Right to Information’s (NCPRI’s) Nikhil Dey condemned those ministers who call themselves deshbhakts but actually work against the interests of the people; “if acche din would come then it will for few people at the cost of bure din of millions of poor people”, he said, adding, “Time is not far away when they will rise against this tyranny.” Brinda Karat of the CPI-M challenged the “arbitrary and anti people” decisions of Modi.
Trade Union leader Gautam Mody supported the “struggle” and called for coming together of farmers, workers and industrial labour to challenge the corporate agenda and the time has come when every people's movement in the country have to start talking to each other1 and understand the deep rooted inter-linkages of the issues and tyranny of the political class.
In a symbolic move, Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal and top Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan arrived at the protest. Kejriwal "expressed full solidarity with the struggle and promised that their party would raise the issues both inside the Parliament and also across the country”, the NBA statement said.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog