Decision to raise Narmada dam height taken in order to "help" Gujarat-based corporate houses: NBA

By A Representative
The Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), India’s most well-known anti-Narmada dam body, has said that the recent decision of the Government of India to raise the dam height from 121.92 metres to 139.68 metres has been reached with an eye on helping Gujarat-based “corporates and industries”, who have been “eyeing the Narmada waters and command area land” for quite some time. With this aim in mind, NBA added, “the Gujarat government plans to denotify 4 lakh hecatres (ha) of land from the command area and reserve it for corporates.”
Saying that the decision only goes to suggest “sheer insensitivity” of the government towards “farmers and the entire rural landscape”, the NBA termed it “illegal and undemocratic” as it would “consign 2.5 lakh people – tribals, farmers, fish workers, potters, landless -- to a watery grave, without ensuring land and livelihood-based rehabilitation”, as per the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) award and judgments of the Supreme Court.
In a statement issued soon after a protest rally at Jantar Mantar in Delhi under the NBA, in which hundreds of oustees from Narmada dam affected villages of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat participated, the anti-dam body said, it “denounced the outrageous manner in which the new government, within just three weeks of assuming power, has chosen to disregard the legitimate questions and concerns raised by a three decades old social movement.”
Pointing out that the “hasty decision” has raised questions about the Prime Minister’s “political and economic motives”, the statement said, the decision has been reached “despite the fact that as of today than 20 per cent of the dam waters are being utilized”. Saying that this is because so far less than 30 per cent of the canal network has been constructed in Gujarat, it wondered, “Why this rush to submergence 245 villages, without any roadmap for using the waters, without adequate canal network in place?”
Predicting that the final cost of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) is likely to reach a whopping Rs 90,000 crore, the statement said, “Despite having the most progressive law on rehabilitation, the SSP-affected had to struggle for their rights over years, which led to 11,000 families receiving land in Gujarat and Maharashtra”, but “hardly 30 families in Madhya Pradesh”, where “thousands of families are yet to receive rehabilitation benefits.”
In Madhya Pradesh, the statement said, there is a “nexus of officers and their agents, who duped thousands of oustees”, and about which the Justice Jha commission inquiry report has already given details. Now, “the whole process is sought to be sabotaged”, it said, adding, the decision on Narmada dam leads one to raise “critical questions” on whether it suggested the “development paradigm” of the Modi government.
The NBA demanded:
· Immediately withdraw the decision of 12th June, to raise the height of SSP by 17 metres.
· Undertake a comprehensive, participatory assessment of SSP: including the status of benefits, rehabilitation and environmental compliance as per law.
· Provide land and livelihood based rehabilitation to all the affected families in the three states, as per the NWDTA, state policies, action plans and judicial orders.
· Initiate canal construction work in Gujarat in order to utilize the water already lying idel at 122 metres and stop any diversion of command area land and SSP water to industries and cities, by violating the award.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog