Gas exploration: Reliance Industries' seeks higher price than offered by Govt of India

By Rajiv Shah
In a significant move, the Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has declared that the “higher price” being offered by the Government of India to it for oil and gas exploration off Andhra Pradesh coast is “not market linked”, and it should get an even more, in keeping with market realities. The "revision", which the Government of India has still not formally announced, is from $4.2 per MMBtu (million British thermal units) to $8.4 MMBtu, which was challenged by several politicians, including Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal, who claimed it would mean a “windfall” of Rs 54,500 crore to the RIL.
RIL has quoted a top energy consultant to suggest that the price it should get should be somewhere between $8 and 12, and not just $8.4, in order to ensure that the exploration becomes viable. In a just-released book, “India Has Never Been Here Before”, the RIL has quoted HIS-CERA to say how much should the price be to make an exploration project viable. It says, for onshore exploration and production, the price should be $6-8 per MMBtu, for shallow waters $6-10 per MMBtu, for deepwater $8-12 per MMBtu, and for ultra-deepwater $10-12 per MMBtu.
The RIL’s KG-D-6 operation off Andhra Pradesh coast near Kakinada, named after founder of the company, late Dhirubhai Ambani, falls under “deepwater operations” category. Regretting the “campaign against the revised gas prices”, the RIL insists, “The revised domestic gas price estimated at $8.4/MMBtu … is still not market linked price… and taken on an energy parity basis, is far cheaper compared to alternative fuels being sold without government subsidy.”
Insisting that the price being offered was approved after a gap of seven years, and is to be effective April 1, 2014, the RIL has suggested, in these seven years the price fixed at $4.205 per MMBtu had gone unviable quite some time back. “The prices of other commodities, offshore services, consumer items, etc. have increased disproportionately compared to the revised gas price. Crude oil prices have moved from around $30 per barrel to over $100 per barrel and imported LNG from around $4 per MMBtu to over $14 per MMBtu.”

Risk in exploration, as seen by RIL

The RIL warns, “If domestic gas is not offered at market price, it will result in rapid depreciation of the Indian rupee. There are currently over 100 discoveries but only a few are under production as companies do not find it viable to produce at current prices. This inability to produce gas at current prices will increase dependence on expensive imports and adversely impact our balance of payments.” It quotes HIS-CERA to say that the current gas demand-supply gap at 45 per cent can balloon 80 per cent in 2025. Only a “price hike will make more gas available as more discoveries can be produced reducing the need to import gas”, it says.
The RIL won the KG-D-6 block in 2000 under the Government of India’s New Exploration and Licensing Policy (NELP) following an international bidding. It has gone on to justify its claim for a still higher price than what it is being offered by saying the contractor involved in gas exploration has to bear the entire risk. “The costs are steep. Drilling and exploration of a well in deep waters can cost more than Rs 700 crore. Even if a well strikes oil or gas, the quantum of reserves can only be estimated in terms of probability.” Further, “Each development well costs even more at Rs 1,200 to 1,400 crore”.
Giving financial reasoning for the high risk, the RIL says it has already “invested $12.6 billion, and remains the largest investor under NELP.” It adds, “RIL currently retains only 7 blocks (of which six are off-shore) of the 45 blocks awarded under pre-NELP and NELP rounds. It invested $ 1.92 (Rs 12,000 crore) on the 37 surrendered NELP blocks. It is likely to surrender two more blocks. Many blocks with discoveries had to be relinquished as they were unviable to develop at the current price of $4.205 per MMBtu.”
As of now, the RIL says, it has found 2.279 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas from the oil fields under it, as against nearly 14.5 tcf it had claimed earlier. Arguing against those who say the RIL is “hoarding” gas (especially Kejriwal), it says, “The decline in production in KG-D6 fields blocks is due to reservoir complexity and geological surprises… The issue can be easily settled by getting the existing reserves assessed and certified through any expert international reserve certification agency…”

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog