Skip to main content

Gujarat tribal farmers' new aspiration: Allow us tractors, give quality power to irrigate agricultural land

Tapi adivasi meet
By A Representative
In a development that may create some flutter in the establishment, the Akhil Bharaiya Adivasi Ekta Andolan, Tapi, Gujarat, in what may appear to be an unprecedented representation to the district collector, has demanded that tribal farmers should be allowed to use tractors to till their lands they have lately come to own. Coming from an organization operating in a district whose majority of the population is tribal, the representation wonders, at a time when tribals are being recognized as farmers and given land to till under the forest rights Act, 2006, there is little reason why they should be deprived of the use of modern equipment till their land.
Copies of the representation have been sent to Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel, minister for tribal affairs Kantibhai Gamit, forest and environment minister Ganpat Vasava, and Gujarat governor Dr Kamala.
“It is difficult to understand why is there ban on the use of tractors on the land we own”, the representation says, adding, “If not injustice, what else does it show?” Reflecting the new-found aspiration of the tribals, the demand has come at a time when some experts, particularly Felix Padel, a well-known anthropologist whose main field of interest is tribal people of India, have taken strong exception to handing over land to tribals in the forest areas. In Padel’s view, this is the beginning of private ownership of land, an end of community ownership in the forest areas, and negation of making tribals collective owners of natural resources of forest areas.
Not just tractor, the tribals have also demanded power connections to till their land with groundwater, as they are allegedly deprived of surface irrigation from reservoirs to irrigate their fields. The representation says, they should be provided with quick power connection instead of making them wait for eight months, and power should be continuously supplies instead of just for four hours.
“It often takes six to eight months to get power connection in tribal areas. When we get power connection, it does not continue for more than four hours”, the representation says, adding, “Even today, the authorities continue to violate the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 or PESA, a law enacted to cover the scheduled areas in order to enable Gram Sabhas to self govern their natural resources. We also think that by refusing to provide us with basic facilities like power and communication link, the government is violating the consumer protection laws.”
The representation does not end here. It says, “We are living in the 21st century, when means of telephone and communication have become a necessity. However, to our utter surprise, the officialdom not only refuses to provide any such facility in the area we live. In fact, they snap the facility, if it exists in our area.”
In yet another demand, the representation demands that tribals must be “properly represented in government-formed forest welfare committees and watershed committees.”
It says, “Currently, these committees are formed arbitrarily by the government officials. The practice should stop forthwith, as this is being done in order to perpetuate corruption. We want these committees should be formed at gram sabha meetings, where all the villagers are present.” Watershed committees are an important factor for tribal farmers’ access to water to till their fields.
In yet another demand, the representation says, the tribals are “deprived” of their rights which they are entitled to under the reservation policy in case they do not identify themselves as Hindu. “This is discriminatory”, it points out, adding, “We should be identified only as tribals, and not as Hindus or any members of any other religion.” The demand acquires significance, as many tribals, if they identify themselves as Christian, are sought to be taken out of the reservation category of scheduled tribes. Often, this forces them to return to Hinduism to “obtain” advantages of reservation.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.