Skip to main content

Gujarat’s dry law and wet reality: Prohibition on paper, liquor on the streets

By Martin Macwan* 
Perhaps never before in Gujarat’s history has the issue of alcohol become such a widely debated subject. Here are some key facts.
Ahmedabad Police seizes one bottle of liquor every two minutes. In 2024, they confiscated 300,600 bottles of Indian-made foreign liquor worth ₹5.78 crore. Across Gujarat, 82 lakh bottles were seized, valued at ₹144 crore. No one—not even God—can estimate how many bottles of liquor were not caught.
In 2024, 2,139 cases related to Indian-made foreign liquor and 7,796 cases related to country liquor were registered. A total of 1,58,000 litres of liquor worth ₹55.45 lakh was seized. Vadodara ranked first in these cases, followed by Surat, and then Navsari and Godhra.
Since 2021, Gujarat Police has seized about 87,607 kilos of drugs worth ₹16,155 crore.
Across India, 10,93,000 cases related to prohibition and narcotics were registered in 2021. Gujarat alone accounted for 2,84,000 of them, followed by Tamil Nadu with 2,15,000. In 2020, Gujarat registered 2,42,000 such cases and Tamil Nadu 1,68,000. Gujarat again topped the list in 2021 with 2,83,000 cases.
But how many resulted in conviction?
In 2016, Gujarat registered the highest number of prohibition cases but also had the lowest number of convictions—only one. Experts ironically credit “police investigation” for this outcome.
The shameful comparison is that Mizoram, with only 12.6 lakh people, secured 72 convictions in similar cases, while Gujarat, with 7 crore people, managed just one.
How much money is exchanged to avoid arrest, avoid investigation, or avoid conviction? No deity from among the 33 crore gods could estimate that.
Is prohibition useful?
Research by Geeta Anand, published in The New York Times, shows that a year after prohibition in Bihar, murder and robbery cases dropped by 20%, riot cases fell by 13%, and traffic offences by 10%.
So why isn’t prohibition implemented across India? Because the revenue from alcohol is enormous.
According to India Today, the excise revenue from liquor in 2015–16 was:
Tamil Nadu ₹19,672 crore; Haryana ₹19,703 crore; Maharashtra ₹18,000 crore; Karnataka ₹15,332 crore; Uttar Pradesh ₹14,083 crore; Telangana ₹12,144 crore; Andhra Pradesh ₹12,739 crore; Madhya Pradesh ₹7,926 crore; Rajasthan ₹5,585 crore; Punjab approximately ₹5,000 crore.
My friend and colleague Gagan Sethi says, “Everyone in Gujarat is happy.”
There is prohibition on paper, so Gandhians are satisfied. Liquor is easily available in every village, so people are happy. Police and politicians earn huge profits from the illegal trade, so they too are happy.
Is alcohol distributed during elections? Yes, but no one dares to expose politicians because they wear no belts to pull. During the 2019 general elections, the Election Commission seized liquor worth $44 million—₹392.83 crore—meant for voters. Gujarat supplied 65 lakh litres and ranked sixth in the country, according to Reuters.
Who suffers? Women and children.
Many girls studying at Dalit Shakti Kendra break down while speaking of how their mothers and women at home are beaten, humiliated, abused, and verbally assaulted due to alcohol.
The ordinary people of India are innocent. The government encourages men to drink and collects revenue, and with that revenue it distributes election-time schemes like “Ladli Ben” to the same households. In the end, everything circles back. Men are happy, women are happy, and the government that wins elections is also happy. But who cares about the police struggling to maintain law and order?
Now consider GIFT City, located off Gujarat’s capital. Mahatma Mandir and licensed alcohol do not exist at much of a distance. According to the Chief Minister’s statement in the Assembly on 31 January 2025, since the new policy took effect, GIFT City has sold 3,324 litres of foreign liquor, 470 litres of wine, and 19,915 litres of beer, giving the government ₹94.19 lakh in tax revenue. The state’s campaign promoting “swadeshi” clearly excludes GIFT City—perhaps because this liquor is for the elite, while the poor must remain prohibited.
In 2017, Navsarjan challenged the Chief Minister with a one-line petition: “Name one village among Gujarat’s 18,000 where atrocities have ended because of your development.” He could not provide a single name.
At a time when Gujarat witnessed state-sponsored Ekta Yatra to commemorate the 150th birth anniversary of Sardar Patel, we ask the Chief Minister: name one village in Gujarat where no liquor is consumed, and name one police station where corruption does not exist. What would his answer be?
---
*Founder, Navsarjan Trust, and Dalit Shakti Kendra, a technical-cum- empowerment institute 

Comments

TRENDING

A fearless spirit lost: Rebecca Thomson dies at 17-hour Catalina Swim Mark

By Harsh Thakor  On July 26, 2026, Rebecca “Becky” Thomson suffered cardiac arrest while attempting the Catalina Channel Swim — a marathon open water crossing from Catalina Island to the California mainland. After swimming for 17 hours, Thomson collapsed in the water. Despite the painstaking efforts of emergency responders and the medical staff at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, she succumbed to a devastating hypoxic brain injury and died Friday evening.

Women's groups, feminists hail wrestlers' courage, vow to continue fight after Brij Bhushan acquittal

By A Representative   In a powerful show of solidarity, more than 250 prominent feminists and members of women's organisations across India have condemned the acquittal of former BJP MP and ex-Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in the high-profile sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers. The signatories have expressed unwavering support for the wrestlers who have waged a courageous legal battle for justice against formidable odds.

An open letter to PM: Before you forgive, ask for forgiveness

By Martin Macwan*  Respected Prime Minister,  The first step toward true forgiveness is asking for it, and it is out of respect for the Constitution that the title "Honourable" is used for the office of the Prime Minister. Every abuse is "dirty" because almost all abuse is uttered with the conscious intention of publicly humiliating a woman, much like the disrobing of Draupadi in the royal court. This includes remarks like "Jersey Cow," used at public meetings on the Gujarati land of Gandhi and Sardar; comparing a female MP's laughter in India's Parliament to "Surpanakha's laugh"; and using a vulgar address like "Didi O Didi" for a Chief Minister who holds a respected position in a democracy—along with every other such remark. In the 79-year history of independent India, you are better placed than anyone to say which Prime Minister has used such language against women.