Skip to main content

Adivasi voices silenced: Revisiting ZPTC/ MPTC reservations in Scheduled Areas

By Dr Palla Trinadha Rao 
Reserving Zilla Parishad Territorial Constituency (ZPTC) seats for non-tribals in the Scheduled Areas of Telangana violates the spirit of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution and runs contrary to the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA). PESA was enacted to guarantee self-governance and political empowerment of STs in constitutionally protected areas. Yet, the present reservation pattern notified for local body elections in Telangana undermines this constitutional mandate.  
This issue is particularly serious because Telangana has 85 Scheduled-Area mandals—30 fully notified and 55 partially notified—spread across nine districts: Adilabad, Kumuram Bheem–Asifabad, Mancherial, Mulugu, Warangal/ Mahabubabad region, Mahabubabad, Bhadradri–Kothagudem, Khammam, and Nagarkurnool. For instance, in Bhadradri–Kothagudem district alone, there are 16 fully Scheduled Mandals and six partially Scheduled Mandals.  
As per the notification issued by the District Election Authority in September 2025, out of the 22 ZPTC seats, only 10 seats were reserved for STs. Although the district has 16 fully Scheduled Mandals and six partially Scheduled Mandals, the District Collector issued election notifications reserving ZPTC seats in Scheduled Mandals even for non-tribals. Similarly, in Venkatapuram and Wajedu—both Scheduled Mandals in Mulugu district—their ZPTC seats have been reserved for non-tribals, effectively denying STs representation at the Zilla Parishad level. This gross under-reservation runs counter to the constitutional objective of ensuring meaningful tribal participation in local governance.  
Section 4(g) of PESA mandates that not less than 50% of all seats in Panchayats located in Scheduled Areas must be reserved for STs. It also requires reservation of Chairperson posts in favour of STs at all levels of Panchayats. These provisions are intended to ensure that the governance of Scheduled Areas remains in the hands of tribal communities.  
Judicial decisions have reiterated this principle. In Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar & Others (2010), the Supreme Court held that reservation exceeding 50% is permissible in Scheduled Areas due to the special protections under Article 243M(4)(b). The Court upheld reservation frameworks such as the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, which provides up to 80% reservation in Scheduled-Area local bodies. Likewise, in B. Balaji & Another v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (A.P.) (2002), the A.P. High Court struck down the reservation of a Chairperson post for a non-tribal, ruling that even partial exclusion of villages from a Scheduled Area cannot dilute PESA’s mandate.  
The Andhra Pradesh Tribes Advisory Council (TAC), a constitutional body under the Fifth Schedule, resolved in its 103rd meeting (02-07-2010) that all Mandal Parishad Territorial Constituency (MPTC) and ZPTC seats in Scheduled Areas must be reserved exclusively for STs. This reflects the constitutional vision for tribal self-governance. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has implemented this mandate through Government Order (G.O.) Rt. No. 89 (05-03-2020), reserving all ZPTC seats in fully Scheduled Mandals exclusively for STs. Telangana, however, has not adopted a similar policy despite having a comparable Scheduled-Area structure and tribal population.  
Reserving ZPTC seats for STs in plain areas does not fulfil the purpose of PESA. Representatives elected from non-Scheduled areas cannot adequately address the unique challenges of tribals living in remote, forested, and socio-economically vulnerable Scheduled Areas. Moreover, using district-level population as the basis for reservations, instead of mandal-level Scheduled-Area status, violates the spirit of the Fifth Schedule. Scheduled Areas are constitutionally distinct, and their governance framework must reflect that distinction.  
The Government of Telangana must urgently revise the existing reservation notifications for ZPTC and MPTC seats in Scheduled Areas. Tribal organisations have demanded that all ZPTC and MPTC seats in fully and partially Scheduled Mandals be reserved exclusively for STs, irrespective of population proportions. Such a policy would align state practice with PESA, the Fifth Schedule, and binding judicial precedents, ensuring legitimate tribal self-governance.  
Restoring reservation rights in Scheduled Areas is not merely a legal requirement—it is essential for safeguarding the cultural integrity, administrative rights, and constitutional protections of Adivasi communities. Telangana must act now to honour both the constitutional mandate and the lived realities of its tribal populations.  

Comments

TRENDING

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah  Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

From protest to proof: Why civil society must rethink environmental resistance

By Shankar Sharma*  As concerned environmentalists and informed citizens, many of us share deep unease about the way environmental governance in our country is being managed—or mismanaged. Our complaints range across sectors and regions, and most of them are legitimate. Yet a hard question confronts us: are complaints, by themselves, effective? Experience suggests they are not.

Dalit woman student’s death sparks allegations of institutional neglect in Himachal college

By A Representative   A Dalit rights organisation has alleged severe caste- and gender-based institutional violence leading to the death of a 19-year-old Dalit woman student at Government Degree College, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, and has demanded arrests, resignations, and an independent inquiry into the case.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Kolkata event marks 100 years since first Communist conference in India

By Harsh Thakor*   A public assembly was held in Kolkata on December 24, 2025, to mark the centenary of the First Communist Conference in India , originally convened in Kanpur from December 26 to 28, 1925. The programme was organised by CPI (ML) New Democracy at Subodh Mallik Square on Lenin Sarani. According to the organisers, around 2,000 people attended the assembly.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

The architect of Congolese liberation: The life and legacy of Patrice Lumumba

By Harsh Thakor*  Patrice Émery Lumumba remains a central figure in the history of African decolonization, serving as the first Prime Minister of the independent Republic of the Congo. Born on July 2, 1925, Lumumba emerged as a radical anti-colonial leader who sought to unify a nation fractured by decades of Belgian rule. His tenure, however, lasted less than seven months before his dismissal and subsequent assassination on January 17, 1961.

Venezuela and the crisis of global order: Erosion of rules-based international order

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The American attack on Venezuela violates every principle of international law that the collective West claims to uphold. The response from the European Union—“we are monitoring the situation”—exposes the hollowness of these claims. WhatsApp gossipers may celebrate this as an act of “bravery,” but what kind of bravery is it to intimidate a neighbour that is neither large in size nor strong in military power?