Skip to main content

State-sponsored mobocracy? Surat authorities were 'forced' to take anti-Muslim actions: Report

Counterview Desk 
A fact-finding report, conducted by Ghulam Saber Ghulam Rasool Malek of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Surat: Shabbir Hameed Malek, senior leader, Surat district; Moin Memon, social worker; Dawood J. Sheikh, advocate; and Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, Gujarat, in a "closer look" into the alleged anti-Muslim actions in Surat has said that it was a state-sponsored mobocracy, claiming, the mob in Surat "forced the state administration" to act in a biased manner.
Begun following reports that a group of 5-6 Muslim children, aged between 8 and 10, threw stones at a Ganesh Pandal, the fact-finding report blames the violence on local leaders, notably on Surat North MLA Kanti Balar, for inciting violence, quoting him for delivering inflammatory speeches through a microphone, saying, “No Muslim will be spared; I am with you.” 
Following this, the mob began to vandalize and set afire vehicles and food carts in the area, with the cops carrying out midnight operations entering "Muslim residential areas, conducting forced entries into homes, verbally abusing women and children, and arresting men present".

Text: 

The Variavi Bazar Police Station is located on the main road of Surat city. A Ganesh Pandal was set up about 50-100 meters from this station. Allegedly, 5-6 Muslim children aged 8-10 years arrived in an auto rickshaw, driven by a Hindu, and threw stones at the Ganesh Pandal, hitting the drums placed there. The children were apprehended by the public and handed over to the police. Instead of taking them to the nearby Variavi Bazar Police Station, the police took them to the Sayyedpura Police Station, about 250-300 meters away. In this incident, FIR No. 11210061240446, dated 9-9-24, has been registered. In this FIR, the children have been named as accused, and the case has been filed under sections 189(1), 189(2), 190, 298, and 299 of the IPC.
Meanwhile, a crowd of Hindus gathered at Sayyedpura Police Station, mobilized by Hindu community leaders via phone. The crowd repeatedly chanted demands such as handing over the children to the mob, demolishing the houses of Muslims, and other aggressive calls. Surat North MLA Kanti Balar, Mahila Morcha leader Sezal Ben, Corporator Rakesh Mali, Aarti Ben Patel, Mayor Dakshesh Bhai Mavani, and other leaders also arrived and gave provocative speeches through a microphone. MLA Kanti Balar, addressing the crowd in the presence of the police, said, “ કોઈ પણ મુસ્લિમ ને છોડવામાં નહીં આવે, હૂઁ તમારી સાથે છું, જે પકડાયા છે તેમણે છોડવામાં નહીં આવે, આ પત્થર મારો આપણે ચલાવી લેવાનો નથી, હૂઁ તમારી સાથે છું અને ભારતીય જનતા પાર્ટી તમારી સાથે છે” “No Muslim will be spared, I am with you, those who have been caught will not be released, we will not engage in stone pelting, and we don’t want to do this either.” After this, a police officer whispered something to the MLA, who then said, “Repeated stone pelting at any place will not be tolerated; I am with you, and the Bharatiya Janata Party is with you.” Following the inflammatory speeches by the MLA and other leaders, the mob vandalized and burned vehicles and carts selling snacks. The crowd continued to shout for the children to be handed over and later pelted stones at Muslim houses and mosques. When the crowd was forming, members of the Muslim community contacted police officers to request protective measures. The police arrived but remained passive.
Alongside the Sayyedpura Police Station, the mob also damaged and burned Muslim-owned vehicles parked near Khair Tea Center in front of Patel Paubhaji at Katar Gam Darwaza. This occurred in the presence of the police.
The State Minister of State for Home Affairs, Shri Harsh Sanghvi, visited the site of the incident at Variavi Bazaar and, addressing the media, promised that the accused would be arrested before sunrise.
Later that night, around 2 a.m., the police entered the Muslim area of Sayyedpura. They forcibly broke the main gate of Al Ilaf Apartment, entered the flats, abused the women and children, and detained the men. They then proceeded to Roshan Park Apartment under the pretext of going to the terrace, and also took away the men while beating them. When the women inquired about the reason for the arrests, they were abused. During this time, the police also stole the CCTV DVR, which recorded their actions. The police reported the incident as occurring at 9:45 p.m. on 8-9-24. 
All the detainees were arrested in the early hours of 9.9.24, but the FIR was only registered at 6:30 a.m. on the same day, Whose number is FIR no. 11210061240447 in which it is written that a crowd of Muslims gathered and they carried out vandalism while we can clearly see in the video that the crowd of Hindu people is being instigated by the leaders, in the first FIR 27 Muslim people have been named and a crowd of 200-300 has been written and FIR no. 11210061240448 in which a crowd of 70 to 80 people has been accused of vandalizing vehicles, there is no named accused in this, in this FIR 3 Hindu people were arrested and granted bail.
On 9.9.24, the Minister of State for Home Affairs, Surat Police officials, and Corporation officials performed Aarti at the Ganesh Pandal near the Variavi Bazaar Police Station. Subsequently, the administration demolished tea and snack carts and temporary shops near the Sayyedpura Police Station using a bulldozer.
The police produced the accused in court on 10th September at 4 p.m. During this time, the police severely beat the accused, rendering them unable to walk properly, and did not permit them to meet their family members.

Facts of the incident:

  • If the incident occurred near Variavi Bazar Police Station, why were the children taken to Sayyedpura Police Station instead?
  • The driver of the auto rickshaw, in which the children were traveling, was Hindu. Why was he not arrested?
  • The distance between the location of the incident (Variavi Bazar Main Road) and Al Ilaf Apartment, where people were apprehended after doors were broken, is approximately 500-700 meters. This raises questions about the validity of the stone-pelting allegations.
  • The individuals were detained around 2 a.m., but the FIR was only registered at 6:30 a.m. on 9.9.24. This suggests that the case might have been fabricated to target Muslims.
  • All the detained individuals were found at home. If they were guilty, why were they at home instead of being involved in the incident?
  • No action has been taken against the police officers who confiscated the CCTV DVRs from the apartments and roadside cameras.
  • The Ganesh Pandal where the stones were allegedly thrown is located on the main road with no construction nearby. This raises doubts about where the stones came from, suggesting the story may be fabricated.
  • No action has been taken against MLA Kanti Balar, who gave a provocative speech in front of the police.
  • No action has been taken against the individuals who mobilized the crowd at the Sayyedpura Police Station.
  • Those who vandalized and burned vehicles were not arrested, nor were any serious charges filed against them.
  • No action has been taken against those responsible for allowing the crowd to form and engage in violence.
  • No action has been taken against the police officers and staff who brutally beat the individuals who were detained.

On the basis of these facts, we demand:

  • An FIR should be registered against the police personnel who entered the houses without proper authority or an FIR at the time of detainment. The authority and order for such actions should be investigated.
  • An FIR should be registered immediately against the policemen responsible for breaking the doors and windows of the houses.
  • An FIR should be registered immediately against the policemen who entered the houses and abused the women and children present.
  • An FIR should be registered against the policemen who stole the CCTV DVRs from the apartments and roadside locations.
  • An FIR should be registered immediately against Surat North BJP MLA Kanti Balar for giving an inflammatory speech in front of the police, and he should be arrested.
  • If the incident occurred near Variavi Bazar Police Station, the reason for transferring the children to Sayyedpura Police Station should be investigated to determine if it was intended to harass Muslims.
  • The mobile phones of Hindu community leaders who mobilized the crowd at Sayyedpura Police Station should be examined. An FIR should be registered against them for inciting mob violence.
  • Compensation should be provided to the owners of all damaged and burned vehicles, trucks, and property, including doors and windows of houses.
  • The police officers and employees who brutally beat the detained individuals should be arrested, and an FIR should be registered against them.
  • Given the suspicions surrounding the incident, a fair and impartial investigation should be conducted by a sitting judge of the High Court.

Comments

TRENDING

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

From Manesar to Noida: Workers take to streets for bread, media looks away

By Sunil Kumar*   Across several states in India, a workers’ movement is gathering momentum. This is not a movement born of luxury or ambition, nor a demand for power-sharing within the state. At its core lies a stark and basic plea: the right to survive with dignity—adequate food, and wages sufficient to afford it.

Catholic union opposes FCRA amendments, warns of threat to Church institutions

By A Representative   The All India Catholic Union (AICU) has raised serious concerns over what it describes as growing threats to religious freedom, minority rights, and constitutional safeguards in India, warning that recent policy and legislative trends could undermine the country’s secular and federal framework.

Midnight weeping: The sociology of tragic vision in Badri Narayan’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan*  Badri Narayan, a distinguished Hindi poet and social scientist, occupies a unique position in contemporary Indian intellectual life by bridging the worlds of creative literature and critical social inquiry. His poetic journey began significantly with the 1993 collection 'Saca Sune Hue Kaï Dina Hue' (Truth Heard Many Days Ago). As a social historian and cultural anthropologist, Narayan pioneered a methodological shift away from elite archives toward the oral traditions and folk myths of marginalized communities. He eventually legitimized "folk-ethnography" as a rigorous academic discipline during his tenure as Director of the G.B. Pant Social Science Institute.