Environmental nod to Karnataka projects: Govt of India's contradictory approach raises eyebrows

By Shankar Sharma*

Recent decisions made by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) regarding environmental issues in Karnataka have stirred significant discussion in the local media.

Environmentalists have welcomed the rejection of the Kalasa Nala Diversion project across the Mahadayi River (photo) and the Ministry's request for the Karnataka government to clarify the use of forest land for the Yettinahole Water Project.

However, the conditional approval for the Goa-Karnataka power line cutting through the Mahaveer Wildlife Sanctuary has raised serious concerns among conservation advocates.

This apparent contradiction has led many to question the government's environmental policies, suggesting they may be influenced by political factors. Critics point out the inconsistency in reasoning, noting that while the Kalasa Nala Diversion was rejected due to the expected felling of approximately 200,000 trees in a densely forested area, an even larger number of trees—many within a legally protected area—will likely need to be cut for the power line.

Moreover, questions have emerged about the MoEFCC’s prolonged silence regarding the environmental impacts of the Yettinahole project, which has been in discussion for over a decade.

Residents are alarmed by the fact that over the past six years, the MoEFCC has granted approvals for more than 270 projects within protected regions, contributing to the diversion of around 120,000 hectares of original forest land. Reports indicate that between July 2014 and April 2020, the Ministry approved 87% of the environment clearance requests made, leading to significant deforestation.

Impartial approach to evaluating various project proposals in Western Ghats is essential for maintaining ecological integrity

Some political leaders are now using these reports to challenge the MoEFCC's inconsistent policies and its perceived lax enforcement of the Wildlife Protection Act and the Forest Conservation Act.

There are growing fears that the Ministry may fail to address these political criticisms and uphold its responsibility to acts of forest conservation. To restore public confidence, the MoEFCC must reaffirm its commitment to safeguarding forests, rivers, and protected areas by rejecting all proposals for forest land diversion in these critical regions.

This includes re-evaluating project proposals that threaten biodiversity and wildlife sanctuaries and ensuring a consistent application of environmental laws.

In light of these challenges, MoEFCC and NBWL must promptly and permanently reject any proposals that would lead to the destruction of significant forestland in Karnataka's wildlife sanctuaries for hydropower projects.

A comprehensive and impartial approach to evaluating the various project proposals in the Western Ghats is essential for maintaining ecological integrity.

---

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka. This article reflects the author’s representation to the Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and the Vice-Chairperson of the National Board for Wildlife

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Global financial institutions 'ignored' climate warnings in Nepal’s hydropower disaster: SANDRP probe

Counterview News A catastrophic flood disaster across Nepal’s Himalayan river valleys has triggered urgent international scrutiny over the role of multilateral lenders and development finance institutions. According to an extensive investigation published by the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP), international financiers—including the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), and the Export-Import Bank of China —pushed forward major hydropower projects in disaster-prone valleys despite documented warnings, recurring historical floods, and unheeded safety recommendations.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

Counterview

Search This Blog