Skip to main content

Neglected cause of environment ruin, climate change: Unequal, unsustainable life patterns

By Bharat Dogra 

Economic and social inequalities have historically been a very important aspect of injustice, but in addition these have also resulted in some other important distortions which are not so well recognized. At a certain level of utilization of resources, these resulted in the privileged people grabbing a big share to create a life of excess comfort, luxury and property for themselves which unfortunately became a source of attraction for others. Hence what was actually non-viable and wasteful in ecological terms became the desirable norm in unequal societies.
With the rapid spread of colonialism, the life-style of the colonial masters was widely emulated among the elite of their colonies. This created an artificial construct of what constitutes the desirable life pattern, something not based on real needs or rationality but instead on copying and emulation of what is achieved by injustice and what is wasteful.
Having got used to a life-pattern which is achievable only by a minority if it corners an excessive share of resources, the world’s elites have been bent on ensuring that they can always access this or an even more affluent life. They also create an attractive role-model of a life-pattern to which others aspire. This is accepted almost worldwide as the life-pattern to which all newly rich persons must aspire. Such thinking instigates those aspects of human behavior which are based on greed, selfishness and aggression. When such attitudes of many elites are added together these can lead to big resource grabs and even wars needed for this. Hence a life-pattern which was historically made possible by injustice and which is inherently wasteful and ecologically destructive, being based on a cornering of an unjustly high share of resources, has been accepted almost worldwide as the most desirable life-pattern by an overwhelming majority of people. Even those seeking change try to attract followers by promising a somewhat similar life-pattern to those who cannot yet access this, thereby neglecting the ecological constraint or the constraint of various planetary boundaries.
Most aspects of the environmental crisis are rooted in unjust, unequal, wasteful and non-sustainable life patterns of a significant number of people but this aspect is often not discussed while discussing solutions. Hence only half-solutions get discussed generally. Take for example the crisis of climate change. Scientists and activists are absolutely right in linking this closely to fossil fuels and in asking for a timely transition away from fossil fuels and ultimately a phase-out of fossil fuels. The problem arises when they do not go beyond this to ask for even more basic changes in highly distorted human life-patterns and the distorted value systems which support such life patterns. Without changing such life-patterns and value systems getting rid of fossil fuels will be very difficult and may involve hurriedly making certain changes which may be prove to be no less hazardous in their combined impact.
This is why this writer has persistently argued that climate change and nearly a dozen other serious environmental problems should not be seen in isolation. Instead we need holistic efforts in which all the leading environmental problems, which together constitute a very serious threat to life-nurturing conditions of our planet, should be resolved together within a framework of justice, equality, peace and democracy. This means that the most important issues like disarmament, getting rid of weapons of mass destruction, a future without wars, increasing equality, ensuring basic needs and dignity of all people are all considered together with a plan for resolving the most serious environmental problems. All these issues are closely related to each other and the path of wisdom which would enable us to resolve the most serious problems before it is too late lies in working out solutions in ways in which solution of one problem links with the solution of other problems too, instead of allowing these to conflict with each other. This would very necessarily involve challenging the existing life patterns and desirable life patterns and replacing these with alternatives which may involve less use of material goods yet may be able to increase human happiness, satisfaction and safety in more meaningful ways, apart from creating a safer world for other forms of life. This is the most relevant task which should not be delayed any further, it has already been delayed for too long.
The formidable intellectual resources of present-day world have unfortunately been employed in highly segregated ways, so that while we have a wealth of suggestions and plans for segregated solutions, we do not have well-integrated and holistic plans and programs for resolving all the most important problems together in various ways which are supportive of each other. This is the most important task which awaits human ingenuity and wisdom.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include “Planet in Peril”, “Earth without Borders”, “Protecting Earth for Children” and “A Day in 2071”

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.