Skip to main content

BSF men 'harassing' border area villagers seeking to access farms: West Bengal CS told

Counterview Desk 

Hooghly-based human rights activist Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), in a representation to the West Bengal chief secretary, bringing to light what he calls "attack upon Constitutional rights of the villagers by the Border Security Force", has said that people of two border villages, Gobra and Gobindapur, are being unnecessarily harassed while seeking to access their agricultural lands.
Stating that BSF personnel place "considerable restrictions" in accessing their agricultural lands, he adds, this is "a direct violation of article 19(1)(d) of the Indian Constitution which allows Indian citizens ‘to move freely throughout the territory of India’."

Text:

I would like to draw your kind attention to the plight of villagers of Gobra and Gobindapur (District: North 24 Parganas, Block: Swarupnagar, Gram Panchayat: Gobindapur) in accessing their agricultural lands, situated across the BSF (Border Security Force) manned border gates on the Indo-Bangladesh border.
Gate number 26 (Gobindapur ‘BOP’ (MIHIR) 112 BN, NAGA ‘D’ Coy BSF Camp to IBBR (T Junction)) is perennially kept closed by the BSF personnel which compels the residents of the villages mentioned above to take a detour of about two kilometres to reach another gate in accessing their own agricultural lands. During the monsoons, the villagers have to wade through waist-deep water to reach their agricultural lands. The non-cooperation of the BSF personnel in opening gate number 26 forces the villagers to spend a considerable amount of time travelling back and forth every day which limits the time they would otherwise spend undertaking agricultural activities. The opening and closing hours of the gates are also not strictly adhered to and no leniency is shown to the villagers who face such an inconvenience in engaging in their core livelihood activity. Hence, due to the fear of harassment, they often have to reach the concerned gate, way early ahead of the opening and closing hours which further reduces their hours of engaging in agricultural work.
It must be noted that gate number 26 did not feature in the initial plans during the fencing of the concerned border areas and the construction of the IBBR (Indo-Bangladesh Border Road). It only came after the villagers demanded the same to ensure easy access to their agricultural lands. We were hopeful that the coordinated efforts of multiple government departments would address the concerns of the villagers through the construction of the gate.
We would like to inform your office with deep concerns, that despite the construction of the gate and related infrastructure, the same is not opened and the villagers are still forced to undertake arduous trek on foot to reach their agricultural lands. 
The decision to not open gate points to insensitivity of BSF personnel and disregard for the interests of the local population

This is a direct violation of their right to practice their livelihood which is an integral part of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, guaranteeing the ‘Right to Life’. The considerable restrictions placed upon them by the BSF personnel in accessing their agricultural lands is again a direct violation of article 19(1)(d) of the Indian Constitution which allows Indian citizens ‘to move freely throughout the territory of India’.
The decision to not open the gate, which came up after a long democratic struggle points to the insensitivity of the BSF personnel and their disregard for the interests of the local population. ‘Amra Simantabasi’ (We the border populace), a community-based association had also written to the District Magistrate of North 24 Parganas on 29/09/2023 (scanned copy attached) but no appropriate action has been taken to date. The letter had been signed by affected individuals and the same had also been attested and recommended for appropriate action by an elected representative of the Gobindapur Gram Panchayat.
We urge your office to take immediate measures to address the concerns of the villagers and ensure that gate number 26 henceforth remains accessible to the villagers, daily at least for 12 hours (6:00 hours to 18:00 hours).
Thanking you, in anticipation of a favourable response from your end.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.  

Mark Tully: The voice that humanised India, yet soft-pedalled Hindutva

By Harsh Thakor*  Sir Mark Tully, the British broadcaster whose voice pierced the fog of Indian history like a monsoon rain, died on January 25, 2026, at 90, leaving behind a legacy that reshaped investigative journalism. Born in the fading twilight of the Raj in 1935, in Tollygunge, Calcutta, Tully's life was a bridge between empires and republics, a testament to how one man's curiosity could humanize a nation's chaos. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.