Skip to main content

62% of income of national parties came from donations, identity remains anonymous

Between FY 2019-20 and 2020-21, the income of BJP decreased by 79.24% (Rs 2870.943 cr) from Rs 3623.28 cr in FY 2019-20 to Rs 752.337 cr in FY 2020-21; income of INC decreased by 58.11% (Rs 396.445 cr) from Rs 682.21 cr in FY 2019-20 to Rs 285.765 cr in FY 2020-2, says the National Election Watch, Association for Democratic Reforms, analysis of income and expenditure of national political Parties for FY 2020-21:

Political parties have multiple sources of funding and thus accountability and transparency should be an important aspect of their functioning. It is essential to have comprehensive and transparent accounting methods and systems which should reveal the true financial position of the parties.
The Election Commission of India (ECI), in its letter dated 19th November,’14 addressed to the Presidents/General Secretaries of all political parties, stated that it was mandatory for the parties to submit details of their audited reports to the Commission. This report analyses the total income and expenditure incurred, all over India, by the all-National Parties during FY 2020-21, as declared by the parties in their IT Returns submitted to the ECI.
The National Parties include Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Indian National Congress (INC), Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), Communist Party of India (CPI), Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM), All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) and National People’s Party (NPEP).

Status of submission of audited reports by the National Parties, FY 2020-21

The due date for submission of annual audited accounts for the parties was 31st October, 21.
All National Parties (BSP, AITC, CPM, NPEP, NCP, INC, CPI and BJP) submitted their audit reports after a delay ranging from 59 days to 201 days.

Total Income and Expenditure of National Political Parties for FY 2020-21

BJP declared a total income of Rs 752.337 cr during FY 2020-21, but spent only 82.46% (Rs 620.398 cr) of the total income. INC’s total income was Rs 285.765 cr while the party spent Rs 209 cr, thus, party’s expenditure for that year is 73.14% of its total income.
AITC’s total income was Rs 74.417 cr while the party spent Rs 132.537 cr, which exceeds its income for that year by 78.10%.

Total Income of National Parties for FY 2020-21

8 National Parties (BJP, INC, CPM, NCP, BSP, AITC, CPI and NPEP) have declared a total income of Rs 1373.783 cr, collected from all over India.
BJP has shown the highest income amongst the National Parties, an income of Rs 752.337 cr during FY 2020-21. This forms 54.764% of the total income of 8 National Parties during FY 2020-21.
INC declared the second highest income of Rs 285.765 cr which forms 20.801% of the total income of the 8 National Parties.

Comparison of total income of National Political Parties between FY 2019-20 & FY 2020-21

Between FY 2019-20 and 2020-21, the income of BJP decreased by 79.24% (Rs 2870.943 cr) from Rs 3623.28 cr during FY 2019-20 to Rs 752.337 cr during FY 2020-21.
Income of INC decreased by 58.11% (Rs 396.445 cr) from Rs 682.21 cr during FY 2019-20 to Rs 285.765 cr during FY 2020.21.
Between FY 2019-20 and 2020-21, the income of AITC, NCP, BSP, CPI and NPEP decreased by 48.20% (Rs 69.259 cr), 59.19% (Rs 50.659 cr), 9.94% (Rs 5.789 cr), and 67.65% (Rs 4.452 cr) and 62.91% (Rs 1.184 cr), respectively.

Top 3 sources of income of National Parties for FY 2020-21

National Parties have declared donations/contributions as one of their 3 main sources of income.
National Parties that received highest income from donations/contributions include BJP – Rs 577.974 cr, include INC – Rs 95.424 cr, CPM – Rs 95.294 cr, AITC – Rs 42.214 cr, NCP – Rs 26.261 cr and NPEP – Rs 67.17 lakhs.
Collection by Issuing Coupons of Rs 156.907 cr declared by INC form 54.91% of its total income during FY 2020-21.

Top 3 items of expenditure of National Parties for FY 2020-21

The maximum expenditure for BJP has been towards Election/General Propaganda which amounted to Rs 421.014 cr followed by expenses towards Administrative Costs, Rs 145.688 cr.
The maximum expenditure for INC has been towards Election Expenditure which amounted to Rs 91.358 cr followed by expenses towards Administration and General Expenses, Rs 88.439 cr.
AITC spent the maximum of Rs 90.419 cr on Election Expenditure followed by expenditure of Rs 3.96 cr on Administrative and General Expenses.

All sources of income declared by National Parties, FY 2020-21

3 National parties namely BJP, INC and AITC collected 5.42% (Rs 74.46 cr) of their total income from donations through Electoral Bonds for FY 2020-21.
AITC received donations through Electoral Bonds worth Rs 42.00 cr, BJP received Rs 22.385 cr and INC received Rs 10.075 cr.
During FY 2020-21, 6 National Parties, declared receiving an income from Donations/Contributions, a total of Rs 763.379 cr.

Observations of ADR

BSP, AITC, CPM, NPEP, NCP, INC, CPI and BJP parties submitted their audit reports after a delay of 59 days to 201 days.
The most common and popular items of expenditure for National parties for FY 2020-21 are election expenses and administrative/general expenses.
As per the data shared by SBI in response to ADR’s RTI application, Electoral Bonds worth Rs 1019.73 cr were redeemed by parties in FY 2020-21.
In FY 2020-21, there are 8 National and 31 Regional parties whose audit reports are available on the ECI website. Only 8 parties (3 National and 5 Regional) have declared donation through Electoral Bonds Rs 325.06 cr. (BJP- Rs 22.385 cr, AITC- Rs 42.00 cr and INC- Rs 10.075 cr, YSR-Congress- Rs 96.25 cr, DMK- Rs 80.00 cr, BJD- Rs 67.00 cr, AAP- Rs 5.95 cr and JDU- Rs 1.40 cr).
Given the anonymity provided to donors by the scheme, it is seen that Electoral Bonds have emerged as the most popular mode of donations to National Political parties for FY 2019-20 as well. More than 62% of the total income of seven National Parties came from Donations through Electoral Bonds (Rs 2993.826 cr), wherein identity of the donor is not disclosed to the public. Of the Regional parties that have submitted their audit reports, 14 Regional Parties (TRS, TDP, YSR-C, BJD, DMK, SHS, AAP, JDU, SP, JDS, SAD, AIADMK, RJD & JMM) have declared receiving donations through Electoral Bonds worth Rs 447.498 cr.
During FY 2020-21, out of the 8 National parties, only 3 Parties (INC-Rs 156.9075 cr, NCP- Rs 8.20 cr and CPM- Rs 4.408 cr) declared receiving a total income of Rs 169.515 cr from Sale of Coupons.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  
Post a Comment
»

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...
Post a Comment
»

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.
1 comment
»

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...
Post a Comment
»

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.
Post a Comment
»

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
Post a Comment
»

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  
Post a Comment
»

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.
Post a Comment
»

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.
Post a Comment
»