Skip to main content

Top agricultural scientists raise alarm over premature genome-edited rice release, write to PM

By A Representative 
A group of prominent agricultural scientists has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressing serious concern over the recent announcement of genome-edited (GEd) rice lines by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), calling it premature and potentially harmful to India’s agricultural sovereignty and seed sector.
The letter, dated June 7 and issued by the Agriculture Scientists Manch—a collective of senior agricultural experts—warns that the May 4 event, where Union Agriculture Minister officially unveiled GEd rice lines developed using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, bypassed necessary regulatory protocols and may jeopardize India's negotiating power with multinational companies (MNCs) holding crucial intellectual property rights (IPR) for the gene-editing technology.
The scientists, including former Vice Chancellor of Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Agriculture University, Dr Sharad A. Nimbalkar, and Dr K.B. Wanjari, among 20 signatories, pointed out multiple risks associated with the current move.
They stated that the CRISPR-Cas9 system used in the rice lines is not indigenous, and commercial cultivation will require licensing from foreign universities or corporations. This could burden Indian farmers with costly seed inputs and erode national seed sovereignty.
They flagged the possibility of off-target mutations from gene editing and genetic contamination of existing rice varieties. This, they argue, could affect both India's food security and its lucrative $1.2 billion organic rice export market.
Drawing parallels with Bt cotton, the letter warns of a repeat of past mistakes. After Bt cotton's commercial release in 2002, farmers became reliant on MNCs for hybrid seeds, many of which later led to pest resistance, increased chemical inputs, and widespread farmer distress, including suicides.
According to the scientists, ICAR’s announcement sidestepped the Central Variety Release Committee (CVRC) protocol, which typically requires comprehensive multi-year testing before a variety is cleared for commercial use. ICAR’s own Director General reportedly admitted in a Business Standard interview (May 19) that the genome-edited rice lines still need five more years of evaluation.
The scientists argue that the fanfare surrounding the rice lines’ launch, especially with ministerial endorsement and media attention, undermines regulatory integrity and strengthens the hand of foreign IPR holders in future negotiations.
Calling the move "unethical, illegal, and undesirable," the Agriculture Scientists Manch has urged the Prime Minister to intervene and ensure proper scientific and legal protocols are followed. “India must not repeat the Bt cotton experience,” the letter concludes, emphasizing the need for caution before exposing Indian farmers to new technologies tied to foreign control.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Small Farm, big success: How an innovative couple built a model of sustainable farming

By Bharat Dogra  In Sema, a remote village in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district, Bhagwati Lal and his wife Rekha share equal credit for creating a remarkable farm that has become an inspiration for villagers and visitors alike. Their achievement demonstrates how even a very small piece of land can provide a strong foundation for sustainable livelihoods while enhancing climate resilience and protecting the environment.

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline. 

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”