Skip to main content

'Unjust, insensitive': Retired civil servants condemn Justice Gavai’s remarks on homelessness

By A Representative 
The Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), a collective of retired civil servants and diplomats, has issued an open letter to Justice B.R. Gavai of the Supreme Court of India, expressing deep concern over his recent remarks on homelessness.
During a hearing on 12 February 2025 regarding the provision of shelter for homeless persons, Justice Gavai reportedly stated, “By not making these people part of mainstream society, are we not creating a class of parasites? Because of freebies, when elections are declared...people are not willing to work. They are getting free rations without doing any work!” The CCG, citing legal reports and accounts from those present in court, condemned this characterization as unjust and insensitive.
The letter, signed by 71 former civil servants, highlights that homelessness is not a result of idleness or an undue demand for “freebies,” but rather a consequence of the state failing to uphold its Constitutional duties. It argues that the Directive Principles of State Policy mandate the state to ensure dignified living conditions, including access to housing, employment, food security, healthcare, and protection from violence.
The group also pointed out the stark contrast in how “freebies” are defined, questioning why corporate tax breaks and loan write-offs are not scrutinized in the same manner as welfare measures for the most vulnerable.
Recalling past Supreme Court judgments, the letter refers to the landmark Right to Food case (PUCL vs. Union of India, 2001), in which Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Dipak Gupta had ruled that protecting homeless individuals from life-threatening conditions was a core state obligation under Article 21 of the Constitution. That ruling led to the creation of over 2,000 shelters nationwide, though the CCG notes that many remain overcrowded and unsanitary.
The letter criticizes recent demolitions of homeless shelters in Delhi ahead of the G20 Summit, calling them a violation of Constitutional duties. It urges the government and judiciary to focus on long-term solutions, such as affordable rental housing, urban employment programs, and universal access to social security.
Concluding with Mahatma Gandhi’s talisman—urging leaders to consider the impact of their actions on the poorest and weakest—the CCG implores the Supreme Court to uphold its moral and Constitutional responsibility toward India’s homeless population.

Comments

TRENDING

Small Farm, big success: How an innovative couple built a model of sustainable farming

By Bharat Dogra  In Sema, a remote village in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district, Bhagwati Lal and his wife Rekha share equal credit for creating a remarkable farm that has become an inspiration for villagers and visitors alike. Their achievement demonstrates how even a very small piece of land can provide a strong foundation for sustainable livelihoods while enhancing climate resilience and protecting the environment.

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline. 

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”