How to turn India's e-waste problem, third largest, into opportunity? Simple: Offer industry incentives!

By Rajiv Shah

How should one interpret a major problem that may be bogging down a private consultant while preparing an industry-friendly report on a situation that adversely impacts society—especially when the consultant sees little possibility of progress in the supposed desired direction?

Simple: call it an "opportunity" that the industry must seize, even providing an estimate of how big the opportunity could be.

And how does the consultant suggest the industry should reach this "opportunity"? By ensuring that the Government of India introduces incentives to turn it into a profitable business. It's as simple as that!

I recently received a report from Redseer Strategy Consultants, which calls itself "India’s premier strategy consultancy firm" with a global footprint. The report claims that India’s e-waste holds a "$6 billion economic opportunity", pointing out that this so-called opportunity has emerged because "e-waste generation in India has doubled since FY14, driven by urbanization and rising incomes."

The 53-page report, full of graphs, advocates for this "opportunity" while also acknowledging major issues. However, it refuses to elaborate on how these issues should be addressed—except through government incentives.

One key issue: "Only 16% of consumer e-waste is processed by formal recyclers, while informal channels handle 60-70%, leading to inefficiencies and environmental hazards."

Another: Despite projections (whose sources remain unclear) of 17% CAGR growth in the formal recycling sector by FY35, it is expected to handle just 40% of India’s e-waste a decade from now.

This situation persists despite the Government of India introducing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) in 2011 to build a "sustainable e-waste management ecosystem." Initially voluntary, EPR has since evolved into a "mandatory system with defined collection targets for producers." Yet, the report regrets that "gaps remain due to low minimum EPR fees and insufficient formal recycling capacity."

Ironically, the report does not seem to view India’s status as the world’s third-largest e-waste producer (after China and the U.S.), with e-waste doubling from 2 MMT in FY14 to 3.8 MMT in FY24, as a serious problem. Instead, it calls it an "opportunity."

According to the report, "efficient e-waste metal recovery could cut India’s metal imports by $1.7 billion." However, it does not explain why this is unlikely to happen even a decade later. Is it due to a lack of industry incentives—despite the sector already benefiting from significant subsidies? Instead, the report merely states that there is an "urgent need for structured e-waste management and increased formal recycling infrastructure to unlock the sector's full potential."

The report highlights that "the consumer segment contributed nearly 70% of total e-waste in FY24." It also notes a key trend: while appliances are becoming more compact and lightweight, the sheer volume of discarded items is increasing, making efficient recycling strategies essential.

So why is the formal e-waste sector failing to grow? The report explains: "The sector faces stiff competition from informal players who benefit from lower compliance costs and extensive collection networks. An estimated 60-70% of consumer e-waste is processed through informal channels, leading to unsafe extraction methods, environmental pollution, and health risks for workers."

Additionally, the report notes that "10-15% of e-waste remains stored in households, and 8-10% ends up in landfills, reducing overall recycling efficiency." It further admits that "current technologies can extract only 60-65% ($3.6 billion) of potential value, while the current extraction by formal and informal recyclers amounts to just $1.1 billion."

It adds: "While formal recyclers account for only 25-30% of extracted metal value, they recover just one-third of the total potential. The remaining two-thirds are processed through informal channels, leading to inefficiencies and lost economic value."

Despite the formal sector's lack of effectiveness in managing e-waste, the report insists that only formal recyclers can handle the problem properly:

"Strengthening formal recycling networks is key to improving metal recovery rates and maximizing returns. This could slash India’s metal import demand by up to $1.7 billion while ensuring a steady supply of high-value recycled metals."

To transform India’s e-waste problem into an "opportunity," the report urges the Government of India to strengthen regulatory enforcement and incentivize circular economy practices. These incentives, it argues, "will be crucial for sustainable economic and environmental benefits."

Only then, it claims, will "the right policy push lead to a significant reduction in reliance on metal imports, helping India itself as a global leader in e-waste recycling." And that is this "right policy push"?

Let me quote: "Targeted subsidies or tax benefits to encourage investments in advance facilities and technology"!

Comments

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey* Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria* Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor* Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Public money, private profits: Crop insurance scheme as goldmine for corporates

By Vikas Meshram The farmer in India is not merely a food provider; he is the soul of the nation. For centuries, enduring natural calamities and bearing debt generation after generation while remaining loyal to the soil, this community now finds itself trapped in a different kind of crisis. In February 2016, the Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) with the stated objective of freeing farmers from the shackles of debt. It was an ambitious attempt to provide a strong safety net to cultivators repeatedly devastated by excessive rainfall, drought, and hailstorms.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Unpaid overtime, broken promises: Indian Oil workers strike in Panipat

By Rosamma Thomas Thousands of workers at the Indian Oil Corporation refinery in Panipat, Haryana, went on strike beginning February 23, 2026. They faced a police lathi charge, and the Central Industrial Security Force fired into the air to control the crowd.

From non-alignment to strategic partnership: India's ideological shift toward Israel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* India's historical foreign policy maintained a notable duality: offering sanctuary to persecuted Jewish communities dating back centuries, while simultaneously supporting Palestinian self-determination as an expression of its broader anti-colonial foreign policy commitments. The gradual shift in Indian foreign policy under Hindutva-aligned governance — moving toward a strategic partnership with Israel while reducing substantive engagement with the Palestinian cause — raises legitimate questions about ideological motivation and geopolitical consequence.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Search This Blog