Skip to main content

Idea of 'my life, my body, my choices' is a false capitalist notion of individual freedom

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
Suicide is a moral indictment of contemporary capitalist society, which has failed to create dignified conditions viable for human life. The brutality of alienation, discrimination, exploitation, and inequality in various forms drives people to take their own lives. Women are alienated from their own bodies and labour under patriarchal capitalism, where they are controlled in every sphere of their lives. 
There is no life of their own. Constructed moral standards burden women, forcing them into domestication and control under the guise of sexual purity and the reproductive culture of patriarchy. Indigenous communities are displaced and alienated from their livelihoods, land, and resources in the name of mining-led industrialisation and development. 
Working people are estranged from their labour, lives, and society in their everyday struggle to sustain daily existence. Young people are detached from their youthful spirit and creative abilities, pressured to be "productive" and "successful" at the cost of their mental, emotional, social and physical well-being. Such enforced alienating conditions are inherent to all forms of capitalism, driving both the young and old to suicide.
The privatisation of public resources—such as healthcare, education, parks, sports grounds, recreation grounds, beaches, riverbanks and other spaces for individual enjoyment—erodes public spaces in pursuit of profit, turning free pleasure and recreation into commodities for profit. This process promotes individual loneliness, as access to these essential experiences becomes dependent on one’s ability to pay.  
It privatises stress within individuals to steal creative abilities of labour for profit. Therefore, suicide is not merely an individual problem; it is a product of a society that values monetised commodities more than human life. In capitalism’s use-and-discard culture, a person’s worth is determined by their utility. This essentialist and functionalist approach to life under capitalism fosters suicidal thoughts, as individuals struggle with crises that are not of their own making but are instead created by the capitalist system. 
The enforced universalisation of capitalism in its various forms has created conditions of crisis, uncertainty and fear in both lives and livelihoods. The only means of negotiation is to engage with the unfair systems of capitalism and its culture of commodification, where life itself becomes a commodity. Capitalist society is further structured as an orderly object in the marketplace of human beings, where actions are driven by utilitarian principles of individualistic utility, pleasure, and satisfaction. 
Such a society breeds entrenched hopelessness, making suicide appear as an easier option to escape despair conditions of capitalism. Such a Nietzschean capitalist reality embodies the idea that 'the thought of suicide is a powerful comfort; it helps one through many a dreadful night' (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, p. 91). There is no liberation in suicide. 
The Nietzschean concept of the will to power forms the foundation of capitalism and its individualistic culture of competition, where human beings compete to consume and dominate one another within an exploitative system. In this system, exploitation is deeply entrenched. Therefore, individual or mass suicide cannot be a weapon against capitalism, as it is a system that produces cultures of suicide and suicidal thoughts. 
People turn to gods, goddesses, and religions to escape suicidal capitalism, but this fails because there is no metaphysical or spiritual solution to the material realities of life under capitalism. 
The death of capitalism and its immoral and asocial culture is the only alternative for ending the alienating conditions that breed suicide. A dignified and egalitarian life for all can break the capitalist culture of enforced loneliness. By rebuilding society, culture, the economy, and human lives on collective foundations, society can address the suicide pandemic that robs society of its idealistic youth and students. 
The question of whether life is worth living under an unfair system like patriarchal capitalism is no longer merely an existential or clinical issue of mental health. It is a philosophical challenge—one that calls for overcoming suicide by rejecting all forms of capitalism, along with its systems, processes, institutions, and narratives about individuals, relationships, society, family, culture, the nation-state, government, and the economy. The idea of 'my life, my body and my choices' is a false campaign of individual freedom under capitalism. 
Such narratives fragment life, eroding the collective foundations of existence, happiness, and sorrow. Therefore, the collective foundations of happiness and shared sorrow can dismantle individualist claims over life and death.  Life is a beautiful journey between the organic processes of birth and death. Let us enjoy and celebrate life by challenging the capitalist culture that alienates the pleasures of living. No to suicide, no to capitalism, and yes to celebrating life with solidarity.

Comments

TRENDING

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra  Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

'Restructuring' Sahitya Akademi: Is the ‘Gujarat model’ reaching Delhi?

By Prakash N. Shah*  ​A fortnight and a few days have slipped past that grim event. It was as if the wedding preparations were complete and the groom’s face was about to be unveiled behind the ceremonial tinsel. At 3 PM on December 18, a press conference was poised to announce the Sahitya Akademi Awards . 

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

The illusion of nuclear abundance: Why NTPC’s expansion demands public scrutiny

By Shankar Sharma*  The recent news that NTPC is scouting 30 potential sites across India for a massive nuclear power expansion should be a wake-up call for every citizen. While the state-owned utility frames this as a bold stride toward a 100,000 MW nuclear capacity by 2047, a cold look at India’s nuclear saga over the last few decades suggests this ambition may be more illusory than achievable. More importantly, it carries implications that could fundamentally alter the safety, environment, and economic health of our communities.

The war on junk food: Why India must adopt global warning labels

By Jag Jivan    The global health landscape is witnessing a decisive shift toward aggressive regulation of the food industry, a movement highlighted by two significant policy developments shared by Dr. Arun Gupta of the Nutrition Advocacy for Public Interest (NAPi).