Skip to main content

No move to restore Yamuna's natural flow, emphasis only on 'clean up, beautify' river

In an email alert, I recently received an explanation regarding a major reason said to have led to the defeat of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Delhi—the alleged failure of its government, which ruled the state for three terms, to clean up the heavily polluted Yamuna.
The link to an article in the email alert by Bhim Singh Rawat, a Yamuna activist and member of the NGO South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers, and People (SANDRP), wonders, with the BJP now in power in Delhi, "can the people of Delhi now hope for a clean, flowing Yamuna?"
Titled "Can the people of Delhi now hope for a clean, flowing Yamuna?", the article recalls how, during the Delhi Assembly election campaign, Yamuna river pollution became a major political issue. After winning the elections, the Prime Minister and senior BJP leaders blamed the AAP government’s defeat partly on the poor state of the Yamuna. They also promised to clean the river.
Offering what he calls a "scientific perspective," Rawat explains that the health of any river is defined by several factors—its watershed, tributaries, water quality and quantity, aquatic and riparian biodiversity, and floodplain conditions. However, he notes that in the last three decades, efforts "have primarily focused on cleaning the Yamuna."
Rawat regrets that there has been neglect of "other critical factors, such as deforestation in the watershed, deteriorating tributaries, excessive water extraction via dams and barrages, groundwater depletion in floodplains, encroachments, mechanized sand mining, and the disappearance of aquatic life."
"Additionally," he emphasizes, "the impacts of climate change in the Himalayan region, where the Yamuna originates, have also been ignored."
He believes that "for a real revival of the Yamuna in Delhi, coordinated efforts are needed among six state governments—Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, and Rajasthan—along with various central ministries (Agriculture, Jal Shakti, Environment, Urban Development) and regulatory bodies like the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Namami Gange, Upper Yamuna River Board, and Central Water Commission."
Yet, he laments, "Currently, neither the central government nor state governments have taken meaningful steps in this direction. Even a parliamentary committee’s February 2024 recommendations—including measures to increase environmental flow, regulate mining, control pollution, and stop floodplain encroachments—have seen no progress from either the central or state governments."
"Instead," Rawat opines, "the central agencies responsible for river management, such as CPCB, the Upper Yamuna River Board, and the Central Water Commission, face severe shortages of technical and human resources. The central government has further reduced CPCB’s budget this year, raising doubts about how pollution control plans will be implemented on the ground."
Rawat notes that in 2025, a review of the 1994 Upper Yamuna River Board Agreement, which governs water allocation among six states, is scheduled. "Due to this agreement, excessive water extraction upstream has deprived the Yamuna of environmental flow, making pollution control in Delhi almost impossible," he complains.
According to him, "If the central government and basin states take decisive steps to ensure a higher environmental flow during the agreement’s review, there could be significant improvement in Yamuna’s pollution levels in Delhi." He wonders, since the ruling party now governs all Yamuna basin states except Himachal Pradesh, can one "hope" for a comprehensive plan to revive the river, or will Yamuna rejuvenation in Delhi remain an illusion?
Insisting on the need for a comprehensive water policy, Rawat says the AAP government's steps to improve the Yamuna’s condition got bogged down in "political conflicts between the state government and the Lieutenant Governor."
As a result, even today, 1,100 million liters per day (MLD) of untreated sewage flows into the Yamuna in Delhi. Further, Delhi has 37 sewage treatment plants (STPs) and 13 common effluent treatment plants (CETPs), but their efficiency is questionable. "More decentralized STPs must also be built. Additionally, strict measures are required to regulate polluting industries and prevent industrial waste from entering the river," says Rawat.
According to him, "Treated sewage water is a valuable resource for the Delhi government. It can be used for irrigation, industry, and horticulture. Large-scale rainwater harvesting must also be implemented. The government should focus on groundwater conservation, restoring natural water bodies (floodplains, ponds, lakes, stepwells), and expanding green cover."
He believes, "These measures would reduce Delhi’s dependence on freshwater from the Yamuna, lower pollution levels, and increase the river’s environmental flow." However, he warns that "for this to happen, the Delhi government must develop and implement a comprehensive water policy."
Turning to the question of whether the new government is prepared for a "Yamuna strategy," Rawat regrets that "the election manifesto of the new government barely mentions Yamuna’s restoration or revival. The document only states, without details, plans to increase STP capacity by 1,000 MLD and control pollution in major drains (Najafgarh, Shahdara, Barapullah, Ghazipur). There is also a mention of rainwater harvesting and conserving natural water sources."
The manifesto also promises to "increase Delhi’s water supply from 1,000 million gallons per day (MGD) to 1,500 MGD by reducing non-revenue water and negotiating agreements with Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand for more water from the Yamuna and Ganga."
Insisting that this approach "contradicts the goal of reducing pressure on the Yamuna and improving its environmental flow," Rawat points out contradictions in floodplain conservation policies.
"On one hand, ₹700 crore has been allocated to make Delhi flood-free; on the other, commercial constructions under the guise of riverfront beautification are proposed. This raises concerns about potential violations of the National Green Tribunal’s (NGT) 2015 orders and setbacks to past conservation efforts."
"The most alarming proposal is to develop a Yamuna Riverfront like Ahmedabad’s Sabarmati Riverfront," says Rawat. He notes, "In Ahmedabad, a canal supplies Narmada River water to create an artificial reservoir in the city stretch of the Sabarmati, effectively turning it into a stagnant pond. Meanwhile, untreated sewage continues to be discharged into the river, and natural riverbanks are being replaced with concrete commercial developments."
Rawat concludes, "Recent initiatives like the central government’s Yamuna Water Taxi trials, the Lieutenant Governor’s Yamuna Ropeway project, and unauthorized commercial construction in the Yamuna floodplain suggest that the new government prioritizes beautification, water extraction, and navigation over true river restoration."

Comments

TRENDING

Area set aside in Ahmedabad for PM's affordable housing scheme 'has gone to big builders'

Following my article on affordable housing in Counterview, which quoted a top real estate consultant, I was informed that affordable housing—a scheme introduced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi—has deviated from its original intent. A former senior bureaucrat, whom I used to meet during my Sachivalaya days, told me that an entire area in Ahmedabad, designated for the scheme, has been used to construct costly houses instead. 

Punishing senior citizens? Flipkart, Shopsy stop Cash on Delivery in Ahmedabad!

The other day, someone close to me attempted to order some goodies on Flipkart and its subsidiary Shopsy. After preparing a long list of items, this person, as usual, opted for the Cash on Delivery (popularly known as COD) option, as this senior citizen isn't very familiar with online prepaid payment methods like UPI, credit or debit cards, or online bank transfers through websites. In fact, she is hesitant to make online payments, fearing, "I may make a mistake," she explained, adding, "I read a lot about online frauds, so I always choose COD as it's safe. I have no knowledge of how to prepay online."

Just 5% Gujarat Dalit households 'recognise' social reformers who inspired Ambedkar

An interesting survey conducted across 22 districts and 32 villages in Gujarat sheds light on the representation of key social reformers in Dalit households. It suggests that while Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's photo was displayed in a majority of homes, images of Lord Buddha and the 19th-century reformist couple, Savitribai Phule and Jyotiba Phule, were not as commonly represented.

Gujarat slips in India Justice Report 2025: From model state to mid-table performer

Overall ranking in IJR reports The latest India Justice Report (IJR), prepared by legal experts with the backing of several civil society organisations and aimed at ranking the capacity of states to deliver justice, has found Gujarat—considered by India's rulers as a model state for others to follow—slipping to the 11th position from fourth in 2022.

Whither PMAY? Affordable housing in decline as Indian real estate shifts focus to premium segments

A leading property consultant that seeks to provide comprehensive real estate services to developers, corporates, financial institutions, and the government has reported that, while housing prices have risen between 10–34% across India's top seven cities over the past year, the once-robust supply of affordable housing has "tottered and dwindled."

Not just Haren Pandya, even Dhirubhai Shah, youngest assembly speaker, wanted to be Gujarat CM

Dhirubhai Shah with Keshubhai Patel  When Keshubhai Patel was sought to be replaced by the BJP high command in 2001, everyone knows that Narendra Modi became the final choice. However, someone who was part of the top circles those days now tells me something I had no knowledge of—that the choice was between Modi and a Kutch MLA, Dhirubhai Shah, who served as the 16th Speaker from March 1998 to December 2002 during the 10th Assembly, the youngest to take the office.

Of lingering shadow of Haren Pandya's murder during Modi's Gujarat days

Sunita Williams’ return to Earth has, ironically, reopened an old wound: the mysterious murder of her first cousin, the popular BJP leader Haren Pandya, in 2003. Initially a supporter of Narendra Modi, Haren turned against him, not sparing any opportunity to do things that would embarrass Modi. Social media and some online news portals, including The Wire , are abuzz with how Modi’s recent invitation to Sunita to visit India comes against the backdrop of how he, as Gujarat’s chief minister, didn’t care to offer any official protocol support during her 2007 visit to Gujarat.  

Tracking a lost link: Soviet-era legacy of Gujarati translator Atul Sawani

The other day, I received a message from a well-known activist, Raju Dipti, who runs an NGO called Jeevan Teerth in Koba village, near Gujarat’s capital, Gandhinagar. He was seeking the contact information of Atul Sawani, a translator of Russian books—mainly political and economic—into Gujarati for Progress Publishers during the Soviet era. He wanted to collect and hand over scanned soft copies, or if possible, hard copies, of Soviet books translated into Gujarati to Arvind Gupta, who currently lives in Pune and is undertaking the herculean task of collecting and making public soft copies of Soviet books that are no longer available in the market, both in English and Indian languages.

Gujarat No 1 here too? Cops justify torture: 'Muslims, Dalits, Adivasis naturally prone to crimes'

A new report, "Status of Policing in India Report 2025: Police Torture and (Un)Accountability", states that Gujarat tops the list of 16 states and one Union Territory, with 63% of its police personnel "strongly endorsing" torture. Furthermore, 49% of Gujarat’s police personnel were found to have what the report calls a "high propensity" for torture, considering it "necessary and acceptable" for obtaining information across various crime categories—second only to Jharkhand (50%). In sharp contrast, Kerala has the lowest percentage of police personnel "justifying" torture (3%) and the lowest "high propensity" for violence (1%).