Skip to main content

Neglected? Arunachal's 26 major tribes, 100 minor tribes 'deprived of' sixth schedule status

By Avyaan Sharma 

The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution provides for the administration of tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram, allowing these regions to establish autonomous councils with legislative, judicial, executive, and financial powers. However, Arunachal Pradesh, despite having a significant tribal population, lacks similar constitutional protections. 
As of the 2011 Census, Ladakh has a population of approximately 2.74 lakh, while Arunachal Pradesh has around 13.8 lakh people. In Arunachal, there are 26 major tribes and over 100 minor tribes, with two-thirds of the population being tribal. 
Despite this, the state does not have provisions to protect indigenous rights, aside from regulations like the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, and the Chin Hill Regulation, 1896.
Without protective mechanisms under the Constitution, Arunachal Pradesh’s tribal communities are at risk of losing their languages, cultural customs, religious identity, and community rights. For instance, the Tangsa tribe, the largest in the Changlang district, has over 40 sub-tribes, each with its own dialect, but their language is still categorized as "endangered." 
Similarly, the Tangam language is critically endangered, with only around 200 speakers remaining.
Given that the Sixth Schedule aims to protect the rights of indigenous tribes in the northeastern region, it is crucial to extend these protections to the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. The immediate priority is to conduct a thorough census to assess the population, distribution, language usage, and religious practices of all tribes in the state.
The government should convene discussions to explore the inclusion of Arunachal Pradesh under the Sixth Schedule, ensuring the protection of its indigenous communities.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

When Sardar Patel opposed reservation, asked Scheduled Castes to give up their “inferiority” complex

Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel By Dr Hari Desai* It is ironical indeed. Though Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was opposed to any kind of reservation in the government jobs and education as well as in the legislatures (like Mahatma Gandhi), even today his name is being drawn in controversies in the present-day agitations demanding reservation in India.

Activists Akriti, Satyam Verma face NSA in Noida protest case: PUCL

By A Representative   Human rights activist Kavita Shrivastava has alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Police is invoking the National Security Act (NSA) against two activists associated with Mazdoor Bigul in connection with the Noida workers’ protest case, even as labour unrest continues to spread across industrial belts in several northern states.