Skip to main content

Birsa Munda: A true grassroots leader, acceptable to Adivasi masses of indigenous faith

By Joseph Bara* 
Birsa Munda, a late nineteenth century Adivasi freedom fighter of Chhotanagpur, represents the Adivasi shade in the variegated freedom struggle of India. Highly adored today by the Indian nation, his stature as a national hero has grown phenomenally in the last few decades. He is unusually honoured by two memorials in the Parliament of India, and his birthday, 15 November, is observed by the Government of India as ‘Janajati Gaurav Diwas’.  The President and the Prime Minister of India spare time to visit his birth-place to pay him homage.
Adivasis as Relentless Fighters 
The Indian freedom struggle was one of the longest in the colonial world, where Adivasis fought relentlessly from the beginning to the end, making them one of most noticeable protesting groups. As they resorted to armed struggle frequently, violence is seen as the Adivasi trademark. Violence was actually an act of desperation since authorities least cared to communicate with the Adivasis on their grievances. Adivasis, like others, employed other methods as well. The Mundas and the Uraons of Chhotanagpur and the Gonds of central India adopted Gandhian way of protest since the Non-Cooperation movement. Even Birsaites, violent earlier, became Gandhian. Much earlier, since 1858, the Mundas and the Uraons experimented with the constitutional method of agitation, i.e. by petitions, depositions and judicial cases, for four decades under the Sardari Larai movement.
Frustrated with constitutionalism ultimately, the Munda and the Uraon agitators reverted to violence under Birsa Munda-led revolt, called Ulgulan (1895-1900). Though violence-based, the Ulgulan had also a messianic face. Incidentally, the Ulgulan coincided with the mainstream nationalist struggle, led by Western educated elite under the Indian National Congress banner, standardizing petitioning to the British authorities as an agitation method. But the Adivasis had lost faith in it. A decade later, in 1910, the Ulgulan resonated in the Bhumkal of Bastar, another Adivasi heartland. 
While fighting by multifarious means, the Adivasis had their own vision for a disum or rule where the society would be just, free from dominance or exploitation. The protest moves were, therefore, premeditated and actions devised accordingly. In comparison to preceding protests in Chhotanagpur, Birsa Munda’s Ulgulan was a bigger outburst, indicating Adivasis’ accumulated anger. Birsa’s adroit leadership characterized it a concerted action. Besides moving tirelessly to convince the masses on the Adivasi cause and holding nocturnal meetings at strategic places, he organized three levels of loyal disciples.
Legacy in Essence
The Ulgulan lasted only five years. Adivasis’ fight by primeval means like bow and arrow did not stand the mighty British arms. Yet, it shook the colonial hold and sent a strong message to the authorities that the century-old Adivasi problem needed urgent redressal. A ‘thorough’ survey of land tenure holdings and related matters was ordered and, as ‘final’ settlement, a slew of colonial measures ensued, culminating in the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908, considered the Magna Carta of Adivasis’ traditional agrarian rights. In vogue even today, the Act signified a model measure for protecting the Adivasis elsewhere.
Birsa’s intervention gave a new twist to the Adivasis’ destiny. Though an illusion, the Adivasis believed that land issue was now settled. The settlement actually deprived them of most of their fertile land. The situation pushed the Adivasi mind to explore life beyond agriculture. Administrative expansion in Chhotanagpur and Bihari-Bengali wrangle over education-based employment sensitized the Adivasis for this option. Pressure was put on the government and the Christian missionaries to revamp education, hitherto restricted to middle schooling, which led to regeneration of the Adivasi society in the following years.  
Birsa Munda was a true grassroots leader, acceptable to Adivasi masses of indigenous faith, Hindu and Christian following. Beginning from the Munda belt of the present Khunti district and with Birsa’s religious agenda of healing and preaching, the Adivasis’ land issue, the mainstay of Adivasi cultural life, became the central cause and the Ulgulan spread far and wide among other Adivasi groups. Besides influenced by Christian teachings, popular Vaishnavite Hinduism and Adivasi belief swayed Birsa’s personality, which reflected in his leadership style and action.
Birsa framed his foes clearly. While Whiteman authorities and the missionaries, who informed them about Birsa’s activities, were the arch-enemies, the zamindars and their associates, called Dikus, were considered frontline agents of colonialism. Neo-Christian Adivasis, initially attacked as enemy missionaries’ minions, and ordinary non-Adivasis masses living in Adivasi villages were assured no harm.
Unfair History
Such significant role and legacy of Birsa Munda is poorly treated in history. For half a century since his demise in 1900, Birsa Munda was in the nation’s limbo. Only local Adivasis cherished his memory and admired his leadership and heroics for protecting them from British injustice. He appeared before the nation only in 1939-40, somewhat dramatically, afforded by the launching of Adivasi Mahasabha, an Adivasi movement for administrative autonomy of Chhotanagpur and Santhal Parganas, and the annual session of the Indian National Congress at Ramgarh (near Ranchi). The Adivasi Mahasabha invoked Birsa Munda as a cult figure to strengthen the Adivasi movement, whereas the Congress wanted to use him for expanding its base among the Adivasis.
The episode stirred historian’s curiosity on Birsa Munda. Within general neglect of Adivasis’ role in the freedom struggle, Birsa Munda is privileged. A volume by the Government of Bihar, K.K. Datta (ed) History of Freedom Movement in Bihar (1957), contained a chapter on Birsa Munda. The first by a historian, Datta’s chapter stoked detailed investigation in the life and work of Birsa Munda. The Bihar Tribal Research Institute conducted a study, resulting in the publication of Life and Times of Birsa Bhagwan by S.P. Sinha (1964). Another poetic title Dust-storm and the Hanging Mist: A Study of Birsa Munda and his Movement in Chhotanagpur by Suresh Singh (1966) followed, emerging from author’s doctoral study at the University of London.
These publications fixed the place of Birsa in the annals of freedom struggle of India. However, our knowledge and understanding of the persona of Birsa remains incomplete. The volume by Datta gives Birsa Munda an appendix treatment, sparing him only a tiny space. Datta, and Sinha likewise, attempt to dovetail Birsa’s role to the mainstream nationalist struggle, neglected so far and now impelled by the presence of assertive Adivasi voice, led by Jaipal Singh, in the national politics. The works essentially show Adivasi revolt in the mainstream nationalism’s shoe. Like in nationalist political consciousness, a forerunning socio-religious movement is fallaciously explained paving way for the Adivasi political move. The fact is that whatever socio-religious fermentation occurred in the Adivasi society was locally fashioned and intertwined with the protest sequences. 
Supported by a medley of local primary data, Suresh Singh’s The Dust-Storm and the Hanging Mist presents intimate details on Birsa’s life and the Ulgulan. It describes the uprising’s local origin and own direction, but abjures to put the subject on the anvil of historical critique. No attempt is made to relate it to the broader concept of nationalist struggle. This key question becomes pertinent since a stream of later scholarship either denies Birsa Munda the status of an anti-colonial freedom fighter, rating him instead only as a fighter for mundane agrarian rights of the Adivasis; or, while recognizing his nationalist face, estimates him as a leader of secondary importance.
Baseless Highlights 
The literary-type diction of Suresh Singh’s story elicited literati’s interest on Birsa Munda. Distinguished writer Mahasweta Devi was inspired to publish a Sahitya Akademi award-winning novel on Birsa, Aranyer Adhikar (in Bengali, Jangal Ke Dawedar in Hindi) (1977). Even film makers came forward to produce Birsa Munda documentaries. By the turn of twentieth century, Birsa was a prominent freedom fighter figure of the country. 
Meanwhile, even as he is a freedom fighter ideal, historiographical gap on Birsa Munda lingers. Later writings either iconize Birsa Munda or reiterate subordinate status of his role. In the first case, noted theorist historians, Michael Adas and Ranajit Guha, cite Birsa Munda case liberally to explain millenarianism and subaltern school respectively. This tweaks Birsa as an international historical figure. In the other case, historians first depict Adivasi protests as constituents of nationalist struggle and even commend the Adivasi agitators as pioneering and indefatigable. But soon they turn to question the Adivasi protest method and leadership quality and argue that Adivasi protests were in need of Congress model of coordination and stewardship. Adivasi protests, including Birsa’s Ulgulan, are, in other words, shown playing second fiddle to the mainstream freedom struggle. The stance stems from the prejudiced racist view of Adivasi people being backward sub-humans. 
Sandwiched between the two and hyped politically, today Birsa Munda is improperly appreciated. Various interest groups scramble to use the name as a political windmill. Historical facts are distorted blatantly for partisan ends, sullying Birsa’s salient persona as a secular mass leader. The earliest commentators described Birsa as a religious ‘fanatic’, and when first noticed by the mainstream nationalism at the time independence, he was portrayed as anti-Christian staunch Hindu. Somehow the tendency continues today. 
In reality, Birsa was not partisan. When the question of protecting the Adivasi land and society came, Birsa’s first followers were the Sardari Larai cadres, mostly neo-Christian Adivasis. Under Vaishnavite sway, Birsa was non-vegetarian and wore janeyu. But in 1898, he did not hesitate to sacrilege the Ram Temple of Chutia (Ranchi), the official shrine of the Maharaja of Chhotanagpur, at midnight. He did this for seizing a copper plate there, supposedly the Maharaja’s authority of zamindari in Chhotanagpur. Today, Birsa is recognized as a national hero, but, simultaneously, assigned a communal tag. The whole honour he receives day in, day out by the nation is, this way, hollowed.  
---
*Formerly with Jawaharlal Nehru University

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”