Skip to main content

75th anniversary of proclamation Indian Constitution being defaced: Were roots laid in 1949?

By Harsh Thakor* 
On the 75th anniversary of the Indian Constitution, it is crucial to reflect on its historical trajectory and current challenges. The Constitution, formally adopted on November 26, 1949, emerged during India’s transition from a colony to a semi-colonial, semi-feudal state. This framework retained power structures favoring princely states, landlords, and comprador bourgeoisie. Historian Suniti Kumar Ghosh argued that the Indian Constitution, shaped within the framework of British colonialism, was largely a product of the British Cabinet Mission’s directives, with its Constituent Assembly not elected by universal adult suffrage but through restrictive provincial legislative assemblies.
The Constitution, while presenting itself as a democratic framework, has consistently served the ruling classes. Its provisions for fundamental rights have often been undermined, and state machinery has repeatedly repressed dissent. Laws like MISA and NSA were used to crush workers’ and peasants’ movements, with democratic rights often preserved only through relentless struggle by civil liberties groups.
Despite its foundational principles, the Constitution remains a contested document. While it claims to enshrine equality, systemic inequalities in caste and class persist. Progressive amendments have occasionally been forced by mass movements, but structural issues remain unaddressed. The removal of the right to property as a fundamental right, for example, prioritized land acquisition over land redistribution, reflecting the state’s alignment with imperialist and comprador interests.
Ambedkar recognized the contradictions within the Constitution, emphasizing that political democracy without social and economic equality would remain fragile. His warnings resonate today as democratic rights are curtailed under the guise of security and development. The BJP's embrace of the Constitution's 1949 framework contrasts starkly with its actions, which have undermined its democratic ethos. Laws like UAPA, along with initiatives like NPR and NRC, have been used to target minorities and suppress dissent.
The Modi regime's policies and the rise of Hindutva ideology threaten to dismantle the Constitution’s federal and democratic framework, replacing it with a majoritarian, unitary state. Judicial interventions, such as the recent Supreme Court judgment condemning “bulldozer justice,” highlight the erosion of constitutional values. Yet, the judiciary has also been complicit in enabling the state’s authoritarianism, as seen in cases like Bhima Koregaon.
As India marks 75 years of its Constitution, the struggle for its true democratic realization continues. The fight against caste oppression, economic exploitation, and communal polarization remains central to preserving and advancing the constitutional promise of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. Only sustained people's movements can protect and deepen these principles.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.