Skip to main content

Anti-Muslim hate speech during polls 'jeopardized' safety of India's millions

Counterview Desk 

A coalition of 48 civil society organizations worldwide have said that “hate speech targeting the Muslim community by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and top leaders of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)" during the recent election campaign “highlights the use of Islamophobic, inflammatory rhetoric” in order to fuel a climate of anti-Muslim hate jeopardizing “the safety of millions, as well as the integrity of India’s democracy.”
In statement, they said, “Political use of dehumanizing speech is a precursor to violence, yet the Prime Minister has himself targeted citizens with derogatory labels and unfounded accusations”, calling upon “the international community to hold PM Modi and his party accountable and urge them to cease spreading hate speech immediately.”

Text:

The undersigned civil society organizations and concerned individuals across the world strongly condemn the hate speeches[1] made repeatedly by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and top leaders of his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party against India’s Muslim community since India’s parliamentary elections began in April.
Despite repeated complaints[2] by India’s opposition parties and tens of thousands of concerned citizens[3], Prime Minister Modi has continuously targeted Indian Muslims and his political opponents alike in his hate speeches, fanning the flames of an already dangerous climate of anti-minority hate and violence in the nation.
In his many election speeches, the prime minister has labeled India’s 250 million Muslim as “infiltrators[4], deployed Islamophobic tropes accusing Muslims of having more children[5] than India’s Hindus, and claimed that Muslims will rob other marginalized communities of their reservations. This is a blatant attempt to further normalize and amplify anti-Muslim fears and hatred within Indian society.
Shockingly, Modi has also called[6] the right of India’s Muslim citizens to vote as “vote jihad”, in a blatant attempt to disenfranchise them. Almost on cue, police in Sambhal district of BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh state beat up[7] hundreds of Muslim voters[8] and chased them away to not allow them to vote.
Modi has stoked hatred for and fear of Muslims by saying[9] that should the Opposition parties win power, “terrorists in jail would be invited to the prime minister’s office and served biryani” and “land will be taken away to give to Muslims as part of land jihad.” He has further sought to stoke hatred for Muslims by saying[10] if the Opposition parties win the election they will withdraw affirmative quotas (reservations) from the tribal and Dalit communities and give them to “those who practice vote jihad,” a reference to Muslims.
Modi’s hate-filled rhetoric has also been copied by several other leaders, including by Home Minister Amit Shah who accused West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of promoting Islamic seminaries (madrasas), preachers (mullahs) and mafia, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath who said[11] the Opposition parties wanted to bring the “Taliban” rule to India to implement the Sharia and redistribute “your” (Hindus’) properties to Muslims.
Assam Chief Minister Hemant Sarma, also a BJP leader, has been spewing hatred towards Muslims12 at public rallies, by targeting the setting up of Muslim religious schools, which is a Constitutional right of the Muslim community, and even the right of the Muslims to wear the religious caps.
In March 2024, experts from the Special Procedures of the United Nation Human Rights Council expressed their concerns[12] about the level of anti-minority violence and rhetoric within India as it prepared for the coming elections, as well as the lack of response from the government about these reports and the United Nation’s own communiques. They warned of the danger to minority groups and called for change, citing the need for an election free from discrimination.
We, the global civil society, maintain that the leader of the world’s largest democracy whose parliamentary elections have a significance and bearing for the rest of the world should not stoop to spreading hate speech and must be held accountable for doing so. We call upon the leaders of the international community to impress this upon Mr. Modi, urge him to immediately retract and apologize for his statements, and urge him to commit to holding his fellow party members accountable for spreading violent hate speech as well.

Notes

[1] "PM unleashing hate speech against Muslims from every available forum: Opposition." Business Standard. Accessed May 29, 2024. Business Standard.
[2] "Opposition accuses India's Modi of 'brazen' violations." Yahoo News Australia. May 20, 2024. Yahoo News.
[3] ""Over 17,400 citizens write to EC seeking action against PM Narendra Modi for hate speech." Scroll.in. April 22, 2024. Scroll.in.
[4] "Modi's Speech Against Muslims Sparks Outrage." The New York Times. April 22, 2024. The New York Times.
[5] "Asaduddin Owaisi slams PM Modi's remarks at Rajasthan rally." India Today. April 22, 2024. India Today.
[6] "Modi’s anti-Muslim ‘Vote Jihad’ rhetoric faces severe criticism." VOA News. May 22, 2024. VOA News.
[7] "Muslims in UP’s Sambhal ‘not allowed’ to cast vote, thrashed by cops." Siasat Daily. May 7, 2024. Siasat.
[8] "‘Merciless’ assault, ‘abused’, men detained for shooting videos: 24 hours in UP’s Sambhal." Newslaundry. May 11, 2024. Newslaundry.
[9] "If Congress wins, terrorists will be fed biryani in PM house: PM Modi." Times of India. May 29, 2024. Times of India.
[10] "Modi keeps up reservation rhetoric, says Congress wants to give SC/ST quotas to people who practice ‘vote jihad’." The Hindu. April 22, 2024. The Hindu.
[11] "Now, Yogi raises property redistribution, Sharia spectre." Times of India. May 22, 2024. Times of India. 12 "Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind condemns Himanta Biswa Sarma's offensive remarks against madrasas." The Wire. May 22, 2024. The Wire.
[12] "India: UN experts urge corrective action to protect human rights and end attacks." OHCHR. March 2024. OHCHR.
---
Click here for signatories

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs.