Skip to main content

Chargesheet against journalist Kappan a bid to 'consider' any dissent, criticism a crime

By Siddique Qureshi* 
Movement Against UAPA and Other Repressive Laws (MURL) chairperson Justice BG Kolse Patil has said that in a statement that the Uttar Pradesh Special Task Force (STF) chargesheet in the Siddiqui Kappan case is a highly disturbing document that goes against the Supreme Court's efforts to read the sedition law and prevent its misuse.
According to Justice Kolse Patil, former judge of the Bombay High Court, during a preliminary hearing on a bunch of petitions challenging the sedition law, the Chief Justice of India, NV Ramana, expressed concern over the misuse of the law and the lack of accountability of executive agencies. The Supreme Court's stance reinforced growing criticism that the colonial-era law was being misused by the state to curb citizens' freedom, including freedom of expression.
In recent times, the court has been consistently barring sedition, citing the rigor in the enforcement of the archaic law and the lack of due process. This has pointed to a low conviction rate in these cases, which have shown a significant increase since the year 2016, according to the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) data, sedition cases, and those under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) saw a rise in 2019, but only 3% of sedition cases led to convictions.
In this backdrop, the 5,000-page chargesheet filed by the UP STF against Delhi-based journalist Siddiqui Kappan only corroborates the many apprehensions and concerns that have been expressed by civil liberties groups and supported by the apex court. The chargesheet lays out strange allegations against Kappan, who was arrested a year ago, when he was on his way to Hathras in UP to report on the murder of a Dalit woman.
Kappan was booked under the stringent UAPA, and also charged with sedition (Section 124A of IPC). He has been accused of conspiring to incite unrest and riots – the chargesheet claims that Kappan did not write as a "responsible" journalist, "reports only and only to incite Muslims", and of Maoists and Communists and expressed sympathy with It.
Justice BG Kolse Patil
They have presented volumes of 36 articles written by Kappan in Malayalam – on anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests, riots in northeast Delhi, Nizamuddin Markaz gathering during Covid – as evidence. The STF has attached a case diary note, discussing an article written by Kappan during the anti-CAA protests at Aligarh Muslim University, saying, “In the writing, Muslims are portrayed as victims (who were beaten up by the police and were asked to go to Pakistan).
Kappan has also been accused of serving as a "think tank" of what they call “Popular Front of India (PFI)". These "accusations" are unthinkable, unbearable, and too fictitious to think that they might constitute treason. Clearly, the UP STF is attempting a new definition of crime, in which the government grades any dissent and criticism.
The chargesheet against Kappan is a highly disturbing document that goes against the Supreme Court's efforts to read the sedition law and prevent its misuse. This creates much of the fear that has been highlighted by the court – "executive agencies severely limit individual liberties and criminalize dissent by using a vaguely worded law".
---
*Coordinator, Movement Against UAPA and Other Repressive Laws (MURL)

Comments

Unknown said…
I think Indians are overly sensitive about Sedition. People are sued for decorating a cake with flag and or map of India, or sometimes putting feet on the table where a flag is kept. This is ridiculous. I have read many other nonsensical reasons. However, the duty of state is to maintain law and order and not let an explosive situation become worse. I know and have read many writers purposely present partial news and do a slanted analysis, with a view of embarrassing the current Govt., and disturb/delay the onset of peace, and make the situation worse and uncontrollable. To that extent such writers and politicians must be condemned and held accountable.Preventing such people from aggravating the situation, is duty of State. However, using Sedition as a charge is truly going too far.Sedition should be used only for direct acts of sedition and should have a narrower definition.
October 11, 2021
Post a Comment

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.
Post a Comment
»

Arrests of Odisha activists raise wider concerns over criminalisation of dissent: CASR

By A Representative   A coalition of civil liberties, human rights, student, labour organisations,  Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), has condemned the arrest of Dr. Randall Sequeira, a doctor providing healthcare in Odisha’s Kalahandi and Rayagada districts, and Laxman Nayak, an activist associated with the Maa Mati Mali Surakhya Manch, and demanded their immediate release.
Post a Comment
»

India’s power paradox: Why the AI boom and climate crisis demand a distributed energy revolution

By Shankar Sharma*  India has achieved historic milestones in power sector capacity addition over the past decade. Yet, beneath the surface of these record numbers, an unprecedented confluence of structural demand shifts and climate-induced supply volatility is testing the absolute limits of our national grid. 
Post a Comment
»