Skip to main content

RSS-BJP 'nationalism' is seeking to forcibly fit everybody in a pre-defined mould

By Chaitanya Pandey, Sandeep Pandey*

India today is witness to two contesting ideas of nationalism. There is an idea of nationalism which emerged from the freedom movement. This idea of nationalism was inclusive and tried to take everybody along. It was based on concepts of democracy, secularism and socialism and espoused values of equality, justice, liberty and fraternity.
The torch bearers of this concept of nationalism included Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia, Jayaprakash Narayan, among others. This idea of nationalism promotes unity in diversity and believes that nation will be strong when all diversities would be respeced and there would be an egalitarian society.
The other idea of nationalism is based on the premise that India is primarily a Hindu country. The politics of Hindutva is exclusionary. It not only denigrates Muslims and Christians to secondary status, it also marginalizes Dalits, tribals, women and ethnic and other kinds of minorities. This idea of nationalism, ironically, aspires to create a strong nation by uniting everybody, is divisive in its basis nature.
It fails to see that alienating various sections of society will weaken it, not make it stronger. Recent examples include organization of an event under the banner of Bharat Jodo Andolan at Jantar Mantar by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyaya in which anti-Muslim slogans were raised. The organisers fail to comprehend that objective of uniting India and putting down Muslims, its largest minority, cannot be fulfilled at the same time.
The contradictions of Hindutva ideology also came to the fore when some upper caste people celebrated in front of Dalit hockey player Vandana Kataria’s residence making casteist slurs in Haridwar after Indian team lost at recent Olympics. Upper caste male hegemony is inbuilt into Hindutva ideology which cannot tolerate excellence by anybody else, especially a Dalit, minority, tribal or woman. The mindset of asking Eklavya’s thumb as Gurudakshina by Dronacharya continues.
In Rajasthan in two separate incidents tribals communities of Meena and Bhils have objected to hoisting of saffron flags at symbols which they consider their own, Amagarh fort in Jaipur and statue of Rana Punja Bhil in Udaipur, respectively. Tribals resent the appropriation of their icons by Hindutva politics. People subscribing to the Hindtuva ideology don’t realise that country cannot become strong if you leave the Bahujan, literally numerically, out or try to force your concept of nationalism on others who would like to maintain their distinct identity.
Ironically, immediately after Indian Home Minister held a meeting with Chief Ministers of Northeastern states to resolve long pending border disputes, the security forces of Assam and Mizoram clashed with each other with central security force merely watching. The relationship between two states, which have governments aligned with the central government, became acrimonious and the dispute is yet to be resolved.
This raises a serious question on why under the umbrella of strong nationalism propagated by Bhartiya Janata Party two of its states are embroiled in a conflict like two bitter enemies? Quite clearly BJP’s nationalism doesn’t subsume their insecurity with respect to their identities and doesn’t have the cementing capability to iron out the differences.
The only hope for people who are inspired by the concept of nationalism is to go back to our freedom struggle or the Constitution and keep the idea of secularism, socialism and democracy at its core. Nationalism need not be jingoistic or aggressive. There are crores of people in this country who are silently working to make it strong. 
It is only the ideology which believes in democracy, socialism and secularism which can take everybody along and can hold the country together
They may not raise the "Bharat Mata ki Jai" slogan or pour venom against Pakistan or Muslims at the slightest pretext but are completely dedicated to strengthening the fabric of society, which is a prerequisite for a strong nation. How can a divided society be ever cohesive?
The nation will become strong only if everybody feels part of it. India is a diverse country with people following different religions, cultures, languages, ethnicity, food habits, clothing habits, completely defying the idea of a monolith or one size fits all thinking. If the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh or BJP would forcibly try to fit everybody in a pre-defined mould of its wishful thinking there will be revolt.
The country will be torn apart. Large majority will feel alienated as we’ve seen with Muslims after the passage of Citizenship Amendment Act and the farmers after the promulgation of three anti-farmer laws. People in large numbers sitting on such long protests is a phenomena becoming common in BJP rule pointing to the intransigence of the government’s mindset or its inability to resolve difference with people opposed to its decisions. Either way it is bad for the country. It certainly doesn’t make the nation strong as BJP would like to see.
It is only the ideology which believes in democracy, socialism and secularism which can take everybody along and also has the capacity to accommodate conflicting interests, which can hold the country together. Mutual respect and willingness to make adjustments is key to making people feel that they are part of the project to make nation strong.
The RSS-BJP believes in a sectarian and fundamentalist ideology which is not suited for the above purpose. They may have formed coalitions with various forces around the country to remain in power in various states but the basic nature of their ideology has not changed. 
For example, in the context of recent Afghan crisis the government said it would do everything to bring back Hindus and Sikhs stranded there. Earlier the Prime Minister failed to condole the death of Indian journalist Danish Siddiqui at the hands of Taliban. Such actions are divisive and may serve the politics of Hindutva well but in the long run are going to harm the nation.
Hence there is an urgent need to go back to the basics of our Constitution before the right wing ideology causes further erosion of our values thereby weakening our society. A political movement to restore the spirit of the Constitution and the freedom struggle is necessary. The political parties which profess to be socialist and secular but have compromised under the pressure of Hindtuva politics do not have it in them to bring about this transformation. A fresh beginning has to be made.
---
*Chaitanya Pandey is a recent LLB from Jindal University; Sandeep Pandey, a Magsaysay awardee, is Vice President, Socialist Party (India)

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.